Talk:Ealhswith: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:19, 1 January 2020

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

English Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 5, 2019.

Untitled

Added her year of death. 24.31.169.252 (talk) 05:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Unjustified?"

Please provide a better reason than "unjustified" for not mentioning noteworthy, referenced appearances of this historic person in cultural depictions, like in thousands of other articles on historical subjects. You need to provide reasons why this this article should be special. I see none.

CapnZapp (talk) 15:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please browse any of the following sources [1] [2] [3] [4] apart from reference sources like the show's home page on Netflix, imdb etc. CapnZapp (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many articles list similar cultural depictions because, unfortunately like much of Wikipedia, no one has deleted material which does not comply with the rules. No such mention would pass in a Featured article. A discussion of cultural representations based on reliable secondary sources is relevant as in John, King of England#Popular representations, and if you have a number of depictions then you could create an article similar to Cultural depictions of John, King of England, but a statement that an actor played a historical character does not tell us anything about the character, only about the actor, and is therefore not relevant to this article. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What rule against inclusion do you refer to? Source please. Your notion that a wholly separate article needs to be created just to include depictions in cultural medua is absurd. We have lots of article; you just don't like it for this one. CapnZapp (talk) 11:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:55, 31 December 2019 edit Dudley Miles (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 50,066 edits →"Unjustified?": Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:19, 1 January 2020 edit undo CapnZapp (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 17,102 edits →"Unjustified?" Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	::Many articles list similar cultural depictions because, unfortunately like much of Wikipedia, no one has deleted material which does not comply with the rules. No such mention would pass in a [[Wikipedia:Featured articles\|Featured article]]. A discussion of cultural representations based on reliable secondary sources is relevant as in [[John, King of England#Popular representations]], and if you have a number of depictions then you could create an article similar to [[Cultural depictions of John, King of England]], but a statement that an actor played a historical character does not tell us anything about the character, only about the actor, and is therefore not relevant to this article. [[User:Dudley Miles\|Dudley Miles]] ([[User talk:Dudley Miles\|talk]]) 16:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)		::Many articles list similar cultural depictions because, unfortunately like much of Wikipedia, no one has deleted material which does not comply with the rules. No such mention would pass in a [[Wikipedia:Featured articles\|Featured article]]. A discussion of cultural representations based on reliable secondary sources is relevant as in [[John, King of England#Popular representations]], and if you have a number of depictions then you could create an article similar to [[Cultural depictions of John, King of England]], but a statement that an actor played a historical character does not tell us anything about the character, only about the actor, and is therefore not relevant to this article. [[User:Dudley Miles\|Dudley Miles]] ([[User talk:Dudley Miles\|talk]]) 16:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
			::: What rule against inclusion do you refer to? Source please. Your notion that a wholly separate article needs to be created just to include depictions in cultural medua is absurd. We have lots of article; you just don't like it for this one. [[User:CapnZapp\|CapnZapp]] ([[User talk:CapnZapp\|talk]]) 11:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)