Tobin tax: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:58, 13 January 2005

A Tobin tax is the suggested tax on all trade of currency across borders. This is supposed to put a penalty on short-term speculation in currencies. The proposed tax rate would be low, between 0.05 and 1.0 per cent.

The name comes from the economist James Tobin. It was in 1972, soon after the Nixon administration pulled the United States out of the Bretton Woods system, that Tobin suggested a new system for international currency stability, and proposed that such a system include an international charge on foreign-exchange transactions. Professor Tobin later received a Bank of Sweden Prize in Economics in 1981, and his name will evermore be fixed to this idea.

The idea lay dormant for more than 20 years. In 1997 Ignacio Ramonet, editor of Le Monde Diplomatique, renewed the debate around the Tobin tax with an editorial titled "Let's disarm the markets". Ramonet proposed to create an association for the introduction of this tax, which was named ATTAC (Association for the Taxation of financial Transactions for the Aid of Citizens). The tax has then become an issue of the antiglobalization movement and a matter of discussion not only behind academic institutions but even in the streets and in Parliaments of all the world.

Tobin Tax projects in the world

Since one country acting alone would find it very difficult to implement this tax, many argue it would be best implemented by an international institution. It has been proposed that having the United Nations manage a Tobin tax would solve this problem and would give the U.N. a large source of funding independent from donations by participating states. However, there have been initiatives of national dimension about the tax.

The Tobin-tax idea was the subject of much discussion in Europe in the summer of 2001. On June 15, 2004, the Commission of Finance and Budget in the Belgian Federal Parliament approved the bill implementing the Spahn tax (version of the Tobin tax proposed by Paul-Bernd Spahn). According to it Belgium will introduce the Tobin tax if all countries of eurozone introduce the similar bill.

In Canada it was revived largely through the efforts of Canadian activists in the 1990s, and in March 1999the country's House of Commons passed a resolution directing the government to "enact a tax on financial transactions in concert with the international community."

In the Americas, the Tobin tax has been supported by the president of Brazil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and the president of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, who recently announced that he is currently studying the implementation of such a tax.

Original idea and antiglobalization movement

On a controversial interwiew gave to Der Spiegel on 2001 James Tobin took distance by the antiglobalization movement. However, he continued to state the validity of his proposal (although after some opponents of the Tax claimed the contrary).

I have absolutely nothing in common with those anti-globalistion rebels. Of course I am pleased; but the loudest applause is coming from the wrong side. Look, I am an economist and, like most economists, I support free trade. Furthermore, I am in favour of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the World Trade Organisation. They’ve highjacked my name ... The tax on foreign exchange transactions was devised to cushion exchange rate fluctuations. The idea is very simple: at each exchange of a currency into another a small tax would be levied - lets say, 0,5% of the volume of the transaction. This dissuades speculators as many investors invest their money in foreign exchange on a very short-term basis. If this money is suddenly withdrawn, countries have to drastically increase interest rates for their currency to still be attractive. But high interest is often disastrous for a national economy, as the nineties crisis in Mexico, South East Asia and Russia have proven. My tax would return some margin of manoeuvre to issuing banks in small countries and would be a measure of opposition to the dictate of the financial markets

Tobin observed that, while his original proposal had only the goal of put a break on the foreign exchange trafficking the antiglobalization movement had stressed the income from the taxes with which they want to finance their projects to improve the world. He declared to be not contrary to this use of the tax's income, but stressed that it was not that the important aspect of the tax.

ATTAC and other organizations have recognized that, while they still consider Tobin's original aim as paramount, they thinks that the tax could produce funds available for development needs in the South, and to allow governments, and therefore citizens, to reclaim part of the democratic space given over to the financial markets.

Debate on the tax and critics

Opinion are divided between who believes that the Tobin tax would promote globalization by limiting its negative effects and defenders A Tobin tax is the suggested tax on all trade of currency across borders. This is supposed to put a penalty on short-term speculation in currencies. The proposed tax rate would be low, between 0.05 and 1.0 per cent.

The name comes from the economist James Tobin. It was in 1972, soon after the Nixon administration pulled the United States out of the Bretton Woods system, that Tobin suggested a new system for international currency stability, and proposed that such a system include an international charge on foreign-exchange transactions. Professor Tobin later received a Bank of Sweden Prize in Economics in 1981, and his name will evermore be fixed to this idea.

The idea lay dormant for more than 20 years. In 1997 Ignacio Ramonet, editor of Le Monde Diplomatique, renewed the debate around the Tobin tax with an editorial titled "Let's disarm the markets". Ramonet proposed to create an association for the introduction of this tax, which was named ATTAC (Association for the Taxation of financial Transactions for the Aid of Citizens). The tax has then become an issue of the antiglobalization movement and a matter of discussion not only behind academic institutions but even in the streets and in Parliaments of all the world.

Tobin Tax projects in the world

Since one country acting alone would find it very difficult to implement this tax, many argue it would be best implemented by an international institution. It has been proposed that having the United Nations manage a Tobin tax would solve this problem and would give the U.N. a large source of funding independent from donations by participating states. However, there have been initiatives of national dimension about the tax.

The Tobin-tax idea was the subject of much discussion in Europe in the summer of 2001. On June 15, 2004, the Commission of Finance and Budget in the Belgian Federal Parliament approved the bill implementing the Spahn tax (version of the Tobin tax proposed by Paul-Bernd Spahn). According to it Belgium will introduce the Tobin tax if all countries of eurozone introduce the similar bill.

In Canada it was revived largely through the efforts of Canadian activists in the 1990s, and in March 1999the country's House of Commons passed a resolution directing the government to "enact a tax on financial transactions in concert with the international community."

In the Americas, the Tobin tax has been supported by the president of Brazil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and the president of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, who recently announced that he is currently studying the implementation of such a tax.

Original idea and antiglobalization movement

On a controversial interwiew gave to Der Spiegel on 2001 James Tobin took distance by the antiglobalization movement. However, he continued to state the validity of his proposal (although after some opponents of the Tax claimed the contrary).

I have absolutely nothing in common with those anti-globalistion rebels. Of course I am pleased; but the loudest applause is coming from the wrong side. Look, I am an economist and, like most economists, I support free trade. Furthermore, I am in favour of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the World Trade Organisation. They’ve highjacked my name ... The tax on foreign exchange transactions was devised to cushion exchange rate fluctuations. The idea is very simple: at each exchange of a currency into another a small tax would be levied - lets say, 0,5% of the volume of the transaction. This dissuades speculators as many investors invest their money in foreign exchange on a very short-term basis. If this money is suddenly withdrawn, countries have to drastically increase interest rates for their currency to still be attractive. But high interest is often disastrous for a national economy, as the nineties crisis in Mexico, South East Asia and Russia have proven. My tax would return some margin of manoeuvre to issuing banks in small countries and would be a measure of opposition to the dictate of the financial markets

Tobin observed that, while his original proposal had only the goal of put a break on the foreign exchange trafficking the antiglobalization movement had stressed the income from the taxes with which they want to finance their projects to improve the world. He declared to be not contrary to this use of the tax's income, but stressed that it was not that the important aspect of the tax.

ATTAC and other organizations have recognized that, while they still consider Tobin's original aim as paramount, they thinks that the tax could produce funds available for development needs in the South, and to allow governments, and therefore citizens, to reclaim part of the democratic space given over to the financial markets.

Debate on the tax and critics

Opinion are divided between who believes that the Tobin tax would improve the economy of countries that are damaged by financial speculation and defenders of pro-globalization goals that believe that it would constrains globalization in ways which conflict with the policy of economic institutions like the World Trade Organization and the World Bank and would have then to be rejected. Other people argues that the tax would promote globalization but limit its negative effects.

An unexpected support to the Tobin tax has come by the multimillionaire speculator George Soros, who stated that, while the tax goes against his personal interests, he thinks that its introduction would have positive effects on the world economy.

The "City Notebook" column in the British broadsheet The Guardian, August 30, 2001 put the case against such a tax in straightforward terms. It said that currency speculators are "an exceptionally useful lot, working day-in, day-out, risking their own wealth to supply a thing called liquidity. Without liquidity, markets dry up, prices become volatile and goods become difficult to shift." If a Tobin tax were in place, the editorial continued, that useful work would not be as well accomplished. "The net result is that everyone involved — producer, trader, buyer — becomes poorer, not richer", wrote The Guardian.

External links

that believe that it would constrains globalization in ways which conflict with the policy of economic institutions like the World Trade Organization and the World Bank and would have then to be rejected.

An unexpected support to the Tobin tax has come by the multimillionaire speculator George Soros, who stated that, while it's against his pesonal interests, he thinks that the introduction of the tax would have positive effects on the world economy.

The "City Notebook" column in the British broadsheet The Guardian, August 30, 2001 put the case against such a tax in straightforward terms. It said that currency speculators are "an exceptionally useful lot, working day-in, day-out, risking their own wealth to supply a thing called liquidity. Without liquidity, markets dry up, prices become volatile and goods become difficult to shift." If a Tobin tax were in place, the editorial continued, that useful work would not be as well accomplished. "The net result is that everyone involved — producer, trader, buyer — becomes poorer, not richer", wrote The Guardian.

External links

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ==Debate on the tax and critics==
-Opinion are divided between who believes that the Tobin tax would promote globalization by limiting its negative effects and  defenders of pro-globalization goals that believe that it would constrains [[globalization]] in ways which conflict with the policy of economic institutions like the [[World Trade Organization]] and the [[World Bank]] and would have then to be rejected.
+Opinion are divided between who believes that the Tobin tax would promote globalization by limiting its negative effects and  defenders A '''Tobin tax''' is the suggested [[tax]] on all [[trade]] of [[currency]] across borders. This is supposed to put a penalty on short-term [[speculation]] in currencies. The proposed tax rate would be low, between 0.05 and 1.0 per cent.
+The name comes from the economist '''[[James Tobin]]'''. It was in [[1972]], soon after the [[Richard Nixon|Nixon]] administration pulled the [[United States]] out of the [[Bretton Woods system]], that Tobin suggested a new system for international currency stability, and proposed that such a system include an international charge on foreign-exchange transactions. Professor Tobin later received a [[Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel|Bank of Sweden Prize in Economics]] in [[1981]], and his name will evermore be fixed to this idea.
+The idea lay dormant for more than 20 years.  In [[1997]] [[Ignacio Ramonet]], editor of [[Le Monde Diplomatique]], renewed the debate around the Tobin tax with an editorial titled "''Let's disarm the markets''". Ramonet proposed to create an association for the introduction of this tax, which was named [[ATTAC]] (Association for the Taxation of financial Transactions for the Aid of Citizens). The tax has then become an issue of the [[antiglobalization]] movement and a matter of discussion not only behind academic institutions but even in the streets and in Parliaments of all the world.
+==Tobin Tax projects in the world==
+Since one country acting alone would find it very difficult to implement this tax, many argue it would be best implemented by an international institution.  It has been proposed that having the [[United Nations]] manage a Tobin tax would solve this problem and would give the U.N. a large source of funding independent from donations by participating states. However, there have been initiatives of national dimension about the tax.
+The Tobin-tax idea was the subject of much discussion in Europe in the summer of [[2001]]. On [[June 15]], [[2004]], the Commission of Finance and Budget in the [[Belgium|Belgian]] Federal Parliament approved the bill implementing the [[Spahn tax]] (version of the Tobin tax proposed by [[Paul-Bernd Spahn]]). According to it [[Belgium]] will introduce the Tobin tax if all countries of [[eurozone]] introduce the similar bill.
+In Canada it was revived largely through the efforts of Canadian activists in the [[1990s]], and in March [[1999]]the country's [[Canadian House of Commons|House of Commons]] passed a resolution directing the government to "enact a tax on financial transactions in concert with the international community."
+In [[the Americas]], the Tobin tax has been supported by the president of [[Brazil]], [[Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva]], and the president of [[Venezuela]], [[Hugo Chávez]], who recently announced that he is currently studying the implementation of such a tax.
+==Original idea and antiglobalization movement==
+On a controversial interwiew gave to [[Der Spiegel]] on [[2001]] James Tobin took distance by the antiglobalization movement. However, he continued to state the validity of his proposal (although after some opponents of the Tax claimed the contrary).
+: I have absolutely nothing in common with those anti-globalistion rebels. Of course I am pleased; but the loudest applause is coming from the wrong side. Look, I am an economist and, like most economists, I support free trade. Furthermore, I am in favour of the [[International Monetary Fund]], the [[World Bank]], the [[World Trade Organisation]]. They’ve highjacked my name ... The tax on foreign exchange transactions was devised to cushion exchange rate fluctuations. The idea is very simple: at each exchange of a currency into another a small tax would be levied - lets say, 0,5% of the volume of the transaction. This dissuades speculators as many investors invest their money in foreign exchange on a very short-term basis. If this money is suddenly withdrawn, countries have to drastically increase interest rates for their currency to still be attractive. But high interest is often disastrous for a national economy, as the nineties crisis in Mexico, South East Asia and Russia have proven. My tax would return some margin of manoeuvre to issuing banks in small countries and would be a measure of opposition to the dictate of the financial markets
+Tobin observed that, while his original proposal had only the goal of ''put a break on the foreign exchange trafficking'' the antiglobalization movement had stressed ''the income from the taxes with which they want to finance their projects to improve the world''. He declared to be not contrary to this use of the tax's income, but stressed that it was not that the important aspect of the tax.
+ATTAC and other organizations have recognized that, while they still consider Tobin's original aim as paramount, they thinks that the tax could produce funds available for development needs in the South, and to allow governments, and therefore citizens, to reclaim part of the democratic space given over to the financial markets.
+==Debate on the tax and critics==
+Opinion are divided between who believes that the Tobin tax would improve the economy of countries that are damaged by financial speculation and defenders of pro-globalization goals that believe that it would constrains [[globalization]] in ways which conflict with the policy of economic institutions like the [[World Trade Organization]] and the [[World Bank]] and would have then to be rejected. Other people argues that the tax would promote globalization but limit its negative effects.
+An unexpected support to the Tobin tax has come by the multimillionaire speculator [[George Soros]], who stated that, while the tax goes against his personal interests, he thinks that its introduction would have positive effects on the world economy.
+The "City Notebook" column in the British [[broadsheet]] ''[[The Guardian]]'', [[August 30]], [[2001]] put the case against such a tax in straightforward terms.  It said that currency speculators are "an exceptionally useful lot, working day-in, day-out, risking their own wealth to supply a thing called liquidity. Without liquidity, markets dry up, prices become volatile and goods become difficult to shift." If a Tobin tax were in place, the editorial continued, that useful work would not be as well accomplished. "The net result is that everyone involved &mdash; producer, trader, buyer &mdash; becomes poorer, not richer", wrote ''The Guardian''.
+==See also==
+* [[ATTAC]]
+* [[James Tobin]]
+* [[Paul-Bernd Spahn]]
+* [[Rodney Schmidt]]
+==External links==
+* [http://www.attac.org/ ATTAC]
+* [http://www.ceedweb.org/iirp/ Tobin Tax Initiative]
+* [http://www.tobintax.org.uk War on Want]
+* [http://www.hedgeworld.com/news/read_news.cgi?section=intl&story=intl7215.html  coverage of the issue in HedgeWorld]
+* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,544098,00.html  The Guardian editorializes against the Tobin tax]
+* [http://www.jubilee2000uk.org/worldnews/lamerica/james_tobin_030901_english.htm English version of James Tobin interview on Der Spiegel on [[Jubilee 2000]] web site]
+* [http://www.france.attac.org/a2977 ATTAC France's view on Tobin's interview (English version)]
+[[Category:Taxation]]
+ that believe that it would constrains [[globalization]] in ways which conflict with the policy of economic institutions like the [[World Trade Organization]] and the [[World Bank]] and would have then to be rejected.
 An unexpected support to the Tobin tax has come by the multimillionaire speculator [[George Soros]], who stated that, while it's against his pesonal interests, he thinks that the introduction of the tax would have positive effects on the world economy.