User talk:God's constitution: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:56, 5 January 2020

Welcome!

Hello, God's constitution, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dowry system in India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. We don't delete links just because they are dead, see WP:Link rot. I see that you've done the same on other pages, so please revert your edits. David Biddulph (talk) 11:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add chatbot feature on Wikipedia for better user experience

I suggest to you you should try to add chatbots or chat features by replacing the talk page on Wikipedia. Example: facebook messenger.

It will increase user interface, user experience, and engagement too.

 This is my humble request.🙏 God's constitution (talk) 19:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just stumbled across this. The place to make proposals like this is the WP:Village Pump. S0091 (talk) 06:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Your addition to Naama Bay ‎ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Kuru (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Sir, I have understood the policy of Wikipedia image copyright. I promise that I will not to this kind of activity in the future. Article link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naama_Bay God's constitution (talk) 15:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Please note that I've had to remove material from half a dozen other articles that followed the same pattern. Please do not cut and paste material from other sources; this will almost always result in a copyright violation. I can also see a dozen or so examples of you copying images and presenting them as your own. This is a significant problem - any future actions like this will result in a block. Kuru (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately following the warning above, you've inserted clear copyright violations into four different articles: Income inequality in Denmark, FreePPP, Indian consumer confidence index, and Sackville River‎. Please note that changing one word in a sentence does not magically make it your content. See Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. I've blocked this account until you can convince someone that you understand the problem clearly and will cease adding any material that you've stolen from other sources. Kuru (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

God's constitution (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sir, why you blog me my account, I have not violent any rules of wikipedia. This is not fair sir. If you think I did wrong or break wikipedia rules and policies, so please give me last chance. I will not do such activity again 🙏God's constitution (talk) 01:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=sir, why you blog me my account, I have not violent any rules of wikipedia. This is not fair sir. If you think I did wrong or break wikipedia rules and policies, so please give me last chance. I will not do such activity again 🙏[[User:God's constitution|God's constitution]] ([[User talk:God's constitution#top|talk]]) 01:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=sir, why you blog me my account, I have not violent any rules of wikipedia. This is not fair sir. If you think I did wrong or break wikipedia rules and policies, so please give me last chance. I will not do such activity again 🙏[[User:God's constitution|God's constitution]] ([[User talk:God's constitution#top|talk]]) 01:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=sir, why you blog me my account, I have not violent any rules of wikipedia. This is not fair sir. If you think I did wrong or break wikipedia rules and policies, so please give me last chance. I will not do such activity again 🙏[[User:God's constitution|God's constitution]] ([[User talk:God's constitution#top|talk]]) 01:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}