Binet–Cauchy identity: Difference between revisions
{{context}} |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[algebra]], the '''Binet-Cauchy''' identity, named after [[Jacques Philippe Marie Binet]] and [[Augustin Louis Cauchy]], states that |
|||
{{context}} |
|||
<math> |
: <math> |
||
\left(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i c_i\right) |
\left(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i c_i\right) |
||
\left(\sum_{j=1}^n b_j d_j\right) = |
\left(\sum_{j=1}^n b_j d_j\right) = |
||
Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
+ \sum_{1\leq i < j \leq n} |
+ \sum_{1\leq i < j \leq n} |
||
(a_i b_j - a_j b_i ) |
(a_i b_j - a_j b_i ) |
||
(c_i d_j - c_j d_i ) |
(c_i d_j - c_j d_i ). |
||
</math> |
</math> |
||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
== Proof == |
== Proof == |
||
Expanding the last term, |
Expanding the last term, |
||
:<math> |
:<math> |
||
\sum_{1\leq i < j \leq n} |
\sum_{1\leq i < j \leq n} |
||
Line 37: | Line 39: | ||
\sum_{i=1}^n a_i d_i b_i c_i |
\sum_{i=1}^n a_i d_i b_i c_i |
||
</math> |
</math> |
||
where the second and fourth terms are the same and artificially added to complete the sums as follows |
where the second and fourth terms are the same and artificially added to complete the sums as follows: |
||
:<math> |
:<math> |
||
= |
= |
||
Line 44: | Line 48: | ||
- |
- |
||
\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n |
\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n |
||
a_i d_i b_j c_j |
a_i d_i b_j c_j. |
||
</math> |
</math> |
||
This completes the proof after factoring out the terms indexed by <math>i</math>. ''[[Q.E.D.|(q. e. d.)]]'' |
This completes the proof after factoring out the terms indexed by <math>i</math>. ''[[Q.E.D.|(q. e. d.)]]'' |
||
Revision as of 04:16, 11 December 2006
In algebra, the Binet-Cauchy identity, named after Jacques Philippe Marie Binet and Augustin Louis Cauchy, states that
Setting and , it gives the Lagrange's identity, which is a stronger version of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for the Euclidean Space .
The Binet-Cauchy identity and exterior algebra
When the first and second terms on the right hand side become the squared magnitudes of dot and cross products respectively; in n dimensions these become the magnitudes of the dot and wedge products. We may write it
where a, b, c, and d are vectors. It may also be written as a formula giving the dot product of two wedge products, as
Proof
Expanding the last term,
where the second and fourth terms are the same and artificially added to complete the sums as follows:
This completes the proof after factoring out the terms indexed by . (q. e. d.)