Jump to content

Talk:2019 Pacific typhoon season: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 89: Line 89:
# number of storms by strength
# number of storms by strength
# number of storms making landfall
# number of storms making landfall
# aggregate intensity (ACE)


Are all metrics that are comparable over time.
are all metrics that are comparable over time.
While cost is important, and deserves mention in the lead, it shouldn't be the opening metric. It's not comparable over time, partly because it is a nominal, not real dollars, and it doesn't adjust for increased cost of material.[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="color:#000E2F;padding:0 4px;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">S Philbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style=";padding:0 4px;color:# 000;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">(Talk)</span>]] 13:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
While cost is important, and deserves mention in the lead, it shouldn't be the opening metric. It's not comparable over time, partly because it is a nominal, not real dollars, and it doesn't adjust for increased cost of material.[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="color:#000E2F;padding:0 4px;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">S Philbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style=";padding:0 4px;color:# 000;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">(Talk)</span>]] 13:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
===Editing issues===
The second sentence of season summaries starts {{talk quote block|The first was considerably inactive }}. after examining the edit history I think this resulted from botched editing and should say {{talk quote block|The first half was considerably inactive }}. However, while that change might be trivial, it begs the question of sourcing. What reliable source says that the first half of the year in 2019 was "considerably inactive"?[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="color:#000E2F;padding:0 4px;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">S Philbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style=";padding:0 4px;color:# 000;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">(Talk)</span>]] 13:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:40, 12 January 2020

Template:Hurricane

WikiProject iconAsia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

RSMC Best Track Data

JMA (all tracks) // NOAA // WIS Portal

Name Date Released
1901.Pabuk February 15
1902.Wutip April 3
1903.Sepat August 5
1904.Mun August 22
1905.Danas August 23
1906.Nari September 4
1907.Wipha September 26
1908.Francisco October 2
1909.Lekima October 3
1910.Krosa October 3
1911.Bailu October 4
1912.Podul October 4
1913.Lingling October 18
1914.Kajiki November 14
1915.Faxai November 14
1916.Peipah November 14
1917.Tapah November 22
1918.Mitag November 28
1919.Hagibis November 29
1920.Neoguri December 18
1921.Bualoi December 18
1922.Matmo December 24
1923.Halong December 24
1924.Nakri January 9
1925.Fengshen January 9
1926.Kalmaegi
1927.Fung-wong
1928.Kammuri
1929.Phanfone

Concerns about this article

Emphasis on cost in opening sentence

I am concerned that the opening sentence emphasizes the cost of the season. While that's a relevant metric, there are a number of relevant metrics, many of which dessert mention ahead of cost. In an article about a specific season, a reader may be interested to see how the season compares to other seasons. Measures such as:

  1. number of storms
  2. number of storms by strength
  3. number of storms making landfall
  4. aggregate intensity (ACE)

are all metrics that are comparable over time. While cost is important, and deserves mention in the lead, it shouldn't be the opening metric. It's not comparable over time, partly because it is a nominal, not real dollars, and it doesn't adjust for increased cost of material.S Philbrick(Talk) 13:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing issues

The second sentence of season summaries starts

The first was considerably inactive

. after examining the edit history I think this resulted from botched editing and should say

The first half was considerably inactive

. However, while that change might be trivial, it begs the question of sourcing. What reliable source says that the first half of the year in 2019 was "considerably inactive"?S Philbrick(Talk) 13:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]