Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kudpung: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:42, 14 January 2020

Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

Is it too late to rename the case?

Among the possible names for the case, "Kudpung" has to be one of the worse ones, since it leads to anchoring. Banedon (talk) 04:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Banedon, I have passed your feedback on to the mailing list. SQL ^{Query me!} 04:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Banedon, administrator conduct cases are conventionally named after the administrator in question. In the past 2 years we have had 7, all named in this fashion. If we want to change this convention we would have to have a conversation at a slightly broader venue. – bradv🍁 04:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recusal Request

DGG, are you planning to recuse? Your name is mentioned as an active arb but I note that you had not commented any uptill now. As a long-term colloborator with K, I don't think that you are suff. unbiased. There are other much more credible off-wiki stuff, but I think this issue can be amicably dealt with w/o going into all those areas. ∯WBG^converse 05:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since no ping was sent above, @DGG:. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ∯WBG^converse 05:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not yet decided, and I hope it will not be necessary to decide. . DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wot?! ∯WBG^converse 05:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ::Thanks! [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style="color: red">&#x222F;</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 05:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 :::I have not yet decided, and I hope it will not be necessary to decide. .  '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 05:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
+::::Wot?! [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style="color: red">&#x222F;</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 05:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)