Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds: Difference between revisions
updated |
SMcCandlish (talk | contribs) At this late a date, it is probably unwise to draw attention to years-old WP:DRAMA in the middle of an advice piece; consolidating to a single footnote, for anyone that really wants it. Also some minor markup cleanup, include broken link repair. |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ecoregions|WikiProject Ecoregions]] |
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ecoregions|WikiProject Ecoregions]] |
||
{{Wikipedia: |
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Section header|Our best content}} |
||
We currently have 7 featured topics, 259 featured pictures, 201 featured articles, 22 featured lists, 2 featured sounds and 110 good articles. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Showcase|Here's the list]]. |
We currently have 7 featured topics, 259 featured pictures, 201 featured articles, 22 featured lists, 2 featured sounds and 110 good articles. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Showcase|Here's the list]]. |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
The list of [[Wikipedia:Spoken articles|spoken articles]] concerning WikiProject Birds is found [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/List of spoken articles|here]]. |
The list of [[Wikipedia:Spoken articles|spoken articles]] concerning WikiProject Birds is found [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/List of spoken articles|here]]. |
||
{{Wikipedia: |
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Section header|Guidelines for layout of bird articles}} |
||
==={{anchor|Naming|NAMING}}Bird names and article titles=== |
==={{anchor|Naming|NAMING}}Bird names and article titles=== |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
Sometimes exceptions need to be made; some individual creatures (usually newly discovered ones) do not yet have a formal common name and some groups are known only by their [[scientific name]]. |
Sometimes exceptions need to be made; some individual creatures (usually newly discovered ones) do not yet have a formal common name and some groups are known only by their [[scientific name]]. |
||
Ornithology publications usually capitalise the vernacular name of a species to differentiate it from more general terms.<ref>{{cite book |title=[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]], Volume 1: Ostrich to Ducks |publisher=Lynx Edicions | |
Ornithology publications usually capitalise the vernacular name of a species to differentiate it from more general terms.<ref>{{cite book |title=[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]], Volume 1: Ostrich to Ducks |publisher=Lynx Edicions |date=1998 |editor1-first=Josep |editor1-last=del Hoyo |editor2-first=Andrew |editor2-last=Elliott |editor3-first=Jordi |editor3-last=Sargatal |location=Barcelona |page=25}}</ref> Following discussions, it has been decided that capitals will be used on Wikipedia only for parts of the name that are proper names, consistent with practice in more general-audience publications.<ref name="MOS">See guideline at [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Animals, plants, and other organisms]] ([[MOS:LIFE]]). The topic of capitals has been discussed numerous, times and discussions may be found in the archives. (Examples: [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds/archive 10#Capitalization debate at main WP:MOS|10-1]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds/archive 7#Capitalization conventions|7-1]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds/archive 7#Capitalisation|7-2]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds/archive 2#Capitalisation of alternative names|2-1]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds/archive 2#Upper case bird names|2-2]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds/archive 2#Capitalisation of alternative names|2–3]]). In 2014, a request for comments [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 156#Bird common name decapitalisation|settled]] that lower case will be used, as is consistent with other taxa.</ref> |
||
In publications that capitalise, the phrase "in Australia there are many Common Starlings" clearly indicates a large number of ''Sturnus vulgaris'', while the phrase "in Australia there are many common starlings" could indicate several different types of starling being common. Clearer formulation must be used in a non-capitalising publication like Wikipedia: e.g., "in Australia the common starling is numerous", vs. "in Australia many types of starling are common". Add binomial names in round brackets (parentheses) to reduce any ambiguity if necessary. |
In publications that capitalise, the phrase "in Australia there are many Common Starlings" clearly indicates a large number of ''Sturnus vulgaris'', while the phrase "in Australia there are many common starlings" could indicate several different types of starling being common. Clearer formulation must be used in a non-capitalising publication like Wikipedia: e.g., "in Australia the common starling is numerous", vs. "in Australia many types of starling are common". Add binomial names in round brackets (parentheses) to reduce any ambiguity if necessary. |
||
The topic of capitals has been discussed numerous times and discussions may be found in the archives. (Examples: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds/archive_10#Capitalization_debate_at_main_WP:MOS|10-1]], |
|||
[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds/archive_7#Capitalization_conventions|7-1]], [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds/archive_7#Capitalisation|7-2]], |
|||
[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds/archive_2#Capitalisation_of_alternative_names|2-1]], |
|||
[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds/archive_2#Upper_case_bird_names|2-2]], |
|||
[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds/archive_2#Capitalisation_of_alternative_names|2–3]]). |
|||
And in 2014, a request for comments [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Archive_156#Bird_common_name_decapitalisation|settled]] that lower case will be used, as consistent with other taxa.<ref name=MOS/> |
|||
The [[International Ornithological Congress]] (IOC), which has tried to [http://www.worldbirdnames.org/principles.html standardize] the English-language vernacular names of birds, uses capitalized names. In the vast majority of Wikipedia articles the IOC names are used, [[MOS:LIFE|in lower case]] except where parts of the name refer to a proper noun (e.g. [[New Zealand scaup]]). Wikipedia article titles may diverge from the IOC list when the [[WP:COMMONNAME|most common name in reliable sources]] is different from the IOC name. |
The [[International Ornithological Congress]] (IOC), which has tried to [http://www.worldbirdnames.org/principles.html standardize] the English-language vernacular names of birds, uses capitalized names. In the vast majority of Wikipedia articles the IOC names are used, [[MOS:LIFE|in lower case]] except where parts of the name refer to a proper noun (e.g. [[New Zealand scaup]]). Wikipedia article titles may diverge from the IOC list when the [[WP:COMMONNAME|most common name in reliable sources]] is different from the IOC name. |
||
<table border="1" cellspacing="1" align="right" cellpadding="4"> |
<table border="1" cellspacing="1" align="right" cellpadding="4"> |
||
<tr><th bgcolor="#aadddd">'''Article title'''</th><th bgcolor="#aadddd">'''make [[Wikipedia:redirect|redirects]] from'''<br></th></tr> |
<tr><th bgcolor="#aadddd">'''Article title'''</th><th bgcolor="#aadddd">'''make [[Wikipedia:redirect|redirects]] from'''<br /></th></tr> |
||
<tr><td>[[White-necked raven]]</td><td>'''[[White-necked Raven]]'''<br />'''[[White-Necked Raven]]'''</td></tr> |
<tr><td>[[White-necked raven]]</td><td>'''[[White-necked Raven]]'''<br />'''[[White-Necked Raven]]'''</td></tr> |
||
<tr><td>[[Black-faced cuckoo-shrike]]</td><td>'''[[Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike]]'''<br />'''[[Black-faced Cuckoo-Shrike]]'''<br />'''[[Black-Faced Cuckoo-Shrike]]'''</td></tr> |
<tr><td>[[Black-faced cuckoo-shrike]]</td><td>'''[[Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike]]'''<br />'''[[Black-faced Cuckoo-Shrike]]'''<br />'''[[Black-Faced Cuckoo-Shrike]]'''</td></tr> |
||
Line 91: | Line 84: | ||
Per [[WT:WikiProject Biology/Archive 4#Consensus|this discussion]], the consensus style to write the combination of common name plus scientific name in the lead is bolded common name followed by unbolded italicised scientific name in parentheses: |
Per [[WT:WikiProject Biology/Archive 4#Consensus|this discussion]], the consensus style to write the combination of common name plus scientific name in the lead is bolded common name followed by unbolded italicised scientific name in parentheses: |
||
{{block indent|1=The '''house sparrow''' (''Passer domesticus'') is a passerine bird ...}} |
|||
'''Summary of naming guidelines – common names''' |
'''Summary of naming guidelines – common names''' |
||
Line 105: | Line 98: | ||
===Regional lists=== |
===Regional lists=== |
||
It is recommended for the sake of consistency that regional lists are named as '''List of birds of |
It is recommended for the sake of consistency that regional lists are named as '''List of birds of {{var|[Region]}}''' rather than '''List of {{var|[Region-adjective]}} birds'''. |
||
===Article sections=== |
===Article sections=== |
||
Line 139: | Line 132: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
In general, bird articles should have taxoboxes. This is something we have inherited from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life|Tree of Life |
In general, bird articles should have [[Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system|taxoboxes]] (taxonomy [[WP:Infobox|infoboxes]]). This is something we have inherited from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life|WikiProject Tree of Life]]. There are many examples there to look at. |
||
See [[Wikipedia: |
See [[Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system]] for the full details on constructing a taxobox. |
||
Taxoboxes on the bird pages vary quite a bit from one another and could perhaps be standardised more than they are right now. This may or may not be a good thing. [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds|Discussion]] of this is welcome. |
Taxoboxes on the bird pages vary quite a bit from one another and could perhaps be standardised more than they are right now. This may or may not be a good thing. [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds|Discussion]] of this is welcome. |
||
There are several example bird taxoboxes, suitable for cut |
There are several example bird taxoboxes, suitable for cut-and-paste insertion into entries: |
||
* [[/family taxobox example with picture |
* [[/family taxobox example with picture]] |
||
* [[/genus taxobox example |
* [[/genus taxobox example]] |
||
* [[/species taxobox example |
* [[/species taxobox example]] |
||
* [[/species taxobox with subspecies example |
* [[/species taxobox with subspecies example]] |
||
===Distribution maps=== |
===Distribution maps=== |
Revision as of 19:10, 17 January 2020
This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
|
Main page | Members | Showcase | Taxonomy & resources | Tools | To do | Assessment |
The aim of this WikiProject is to set out broad suggestions about how we organize data articles about birds and related topics. In general, these are only suggestions, and you shouldn't feel obliged to follow them.
This WikiProject aims to help organise our rapidly growing collection of articles about birds. Included in its scope are articles for all known species, genera, families, and orders of birds (both extant and extinct), as well as articles relating to bird anatomy, physiology, evolution, behaviours, diseases and parasites. Also included are articles relating to the study (ornithology) and the keeping (aviculture) of birds, articles on ornithological organisations, biographies of notable ornithologists and their works, and lists of birds found in various human-defined areas (i.e. countries, states/provinces, counties, etc.).
- Related projects
This WikiProject is an offshoot of WikiProject Tree of Life.
- WikiProject Biology
- WikiProject Tree of Life
- WikiProject Animals
- (WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, and then
- WikiProject Dinosaurs, if you're a cladist)
- WikiProject Birds
- WikiProject Dinosaurs, if you're a cladist)
- (WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, and then
- WikiProject Animals
- WikiProject Tree of Life
Related projects include:
Our best content
We currently have 7 featured topics, 259 featured pictures, 201 featured articles, 22 featured lists, 2 featured sounds and 110 good articles. Here's the list.
Feel free to request assistance with references at the reference request desk and any bird-related assistance on the talk page.
Article alerts
Did you know
- 21 Nov 2024 – Anchorage White Raven (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by GreenLipstickLesbian (t · c); see discussion
- 04 Nov 2024 – Standard-winged nightjar (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Reconrabbit (t · c); see discussion
Categories for discussion
- 26 Nov 2024 – Category:Tyrant flycatcher stubs (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by HouseBlaster (t · c); see discussion
Redirects for discussion
- 29 Nov 2024 – Wading birds (talk · edit · hist) →Wader was RfDed by Cremastra (t · c); see discussion
- 29 Nov 2024 – Wading bird (talk · edit · hist) →Wader (American) was RfDed by Cremastra (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be merged
- 29 Nov 2024 – Pseudoalcippe (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Sylvia by UtherSRG (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Jun 2024 – King of Holland's bird-of-paradise (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Lyre-tailed king bird-of-paradise by Awkwafaba (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Jun 2024 – Lyre-tailed king bird-of-paradise (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to King of Holland's bird-of-paradise by Awkwafaba (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be split
- 04 Jul 2023 – Corvidae (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Super Dromaeosaurus (t · c); see discussion
Former FA or GA content includes
Featured articles
Good articles
Spoken articles
The list of spoken articles concerning WikiProject Birds is found here.
Guidelines for layout of bird articles
Bird names and article titles
In general, use the formal common name for article titles.
- Peregrine falcon not Falco peregrinus
- Wandering albatross not Diomedea exulans
- Splendid fairywren not Malurus splendens
Sometimes exceptions need to be made; some individual creatures (usually newly discovered ones) do not yet have a formal common name and some groups are known only by their scientific name.
Ornithology publications usually capitalise the vernacular name of a species to differentiate it from more general terms.[1] Following discussions, it has been decided that capitals will be used on Wikipedia only for parts of the name that are proper names, consistent with practice in more general-audience publications.[2]
In publications that capitalise, the phrase "in Australia there are many Common Starlings" clearly indicates a large number of Sturnus vulgaris, while the phrase "in Australia there are many common starlings" could indicate several different types of starling being common. Clearer formulation must be used in a non-capitalising publication like Wikipedia: e.g., "in Australia the common starling is numerous", vs. "in Australia many types of starling are common". Add binomial names in round brackets (parentheses) to reduce any ambiguity if necessary.
The International Ornithological Congress (IOC), which has tried to standardize the English-language vernacular names of birds, uses capitalized names. In the vast majority of Wikipedia articles the IOC names are used, in lower case except where parts of the name refer to a proper noun (e.g. New Zealand scaup). Wikipedia article titles may diverge from the IOC list when the most common name in reliable sources is different from the IOC name.
Article title | make redirects from |
---|---|
White-necked raven | White-necked Raven White-Necked Raven |
Black-faced cuckoo-shrike | Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike Black-faced Cuckoo-Shrike Black-Faced Cuckoo-Shrike |
Prairie warbler | Prairie Warbler |
When creating a new article for a species, make sure the title is correctly capitalised and create a redirect from the capitalised IOC name. For example, name the article Bald eagle (and write "bald eagle" in the text) but create a redirect to it from Bald Eagle. See the table at right for more examples.
Per this discussion, the consensus style to write the combination of common name plus scientific name in the lead is bolded common name followed by unbolded italicised scientific name in parentheses:
Summary of naming guidelines – common names
- The common name of a particular species is not capitalised, except where proper names appear (e.g. common blackbird, metallic starling, emu, ostrich, New Zealand scaup).
- The name of a group of species is not capitalised (e.g. birds, thrush family, kingfishers, turtle doves, marsh harriers).
- Alternative common names should be mentioned where appropriate; with bold type in the opening line of the article if they are in wide use, elsewhere in the article (with or without the bold type) if they are less-used. This is usually a matter for individual judgement.
Summary of naming guidelines – scientific names
- Orders, families and other taxa above genus level are written with an initial capital and in roman (not italic) text: birds belong to the class Aves; ducks are members of the family Anatidae and the order Anseriformes.
- The names of genera are always italicised and capitalised: Turdus, Falco, Anas.
- Species epithets are never capitalised, always italicised, and always preceded by either the genus name or a one-letter abbreviation of it: Alcedo pusilla or A. pusilla, Cisticola juncidis or C. juncidis. The abbreviation is used only when it is unambiguous in the context of the article.
- The placements in families and genera as well as the boundaries of the species are themselves not always unambiguous or without debate. Although the IOC list is usually up-to-date, new species, and large scale phylogenetic studies may sometimes suggest alternate placements (both binomial combinations as well as higher level classification). These alternate positions are best included with citations with the taxonomic history, older combinations and rationale explained with citations in the article.
Regional lists
It is recommended for the sake of consistency that regional lists are named as List of birds of [Region] rather than List of [Region-adjective] birds.
Article sections
Most of the bird species articles have a common structure which include various combinations of the following:
- Taxonomy and systematics (including subspecies, relation to related species, history of naming, alternate names, and evolution)
- Description (often including details on immature plumage, moult, vocalisations, identification, and similar species)
- Distribution and habitat
- Behaviour and ecology
- Breeding
- Food and feeding
- Threats or Survival
- In culture or Relationship to humans
- Status
Additional sections may be included to cover aspects that are particularly interesting or well studied in that species.
Taxoboxes
Torresian crow | |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: | |
Order: | |
Family: | |
Genus: | |
Species: | C. orru
|
Binomial name | |
Corvus orru Bonaparte, 1850
|
In general, bird articles should have taxoboxes (taxonomy infoboxes). This is something we have inherited from the WikiProject Tree of Life. There are many examples there to look at.
See Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system for the full details on constructing a taxobox.
Taxoboxes on the bird pages vary quite a bit from one another and could perhaps be standardised more than they are right now. This may or may not be a good thing. Discussion of this is welcome.
There are several example bird taxoboxes, suitable for cut-and-paste insertion into entries:
- /family taxobox example with picture
- /genus taxobox example
- /species taxobox example
- /species taxobox with subspecies example
Distribution maps
A good way to show a bird's area of occurrence is to add a distribution map; see the above example on how. Species with tiny areas of occurrence should get larger maps which are displayed thumbnailed.
As for colors, the following are generally accepted as literature standard, for example by the Handbook of Birds of the World:
- Breeding visitor
- Non-breeding visitor
- Resident
- Introduced range
For species that do not migrate, a single color can be used as in the example. At-sea range of birds like albatrosses is usually marked in darker or lighter blue. Small islands can be marked with a larger dot and/or shown magnified in inserts. Migration flyways are often indicated with arrows. Areas of irruptive occurrence- more regular and plentiful than casual vagrancy, such as in crossbill species–can be indicated by colored stippling.
It is good to use basic, web-safe colors. If using nonstandard coloration (e.g. Arctic tern or silvery pigeon), it is important to annotate them. Former ranges of extinct birds can be indicated in dark grey (HBW standard) or red (many other), the former is probably preferable due to unambiguity.
The "HBW standard" colors have one major advantage: they can also, due to differences in brightness, be distinguished by almost all people with some sort of color blindness.
Linking to definitions in Glossary of bird terms
The headlined glossary article (Wikipedia's only featured glossary) contains definitions for many terms that may be useful to link to in bird articles. (Nevertheless, please be mindful of Wikipedia:Overlinking.) Links to definitions in the glossary may be added in other articles and pages using Template:Birdgloss – {{Birdgloss}} – in the form {{Birdgloss|term}}. This will work for exact terms or phrases defined in the glossary, or those anchored to a definition. If a term you wish to link is not already defined or anchored in the glossary, you can pipe a link to a definition, in the form: {{Birdgloss|actual term|display term}}. See the template's documentation for more information.
Linking bird calls and songs
Bird vocalizations can be linked in articles using the template {{Birdsong}}. It provides an attractive link wrapper to recordings of songs and calls for that species' listing at xeno-canto.org – which we use as very few Wikimedia Commons audio files exist. However, where they do, up to four of them can be added to the template, which allows them to be played directly in the article. An example use of the template appears at right, linking to the extraordinary call of the Kookaburra. See the template's documentation for its syntax and how to modify its parameters, including how to change the default image to any one you specify.
Other infoboxes
- {{Infobox book}}
- {{Infobox journal}}
- {{Infobox park}} – for nature reserves
Taxonbar
- {{Taxonbar}} – see Documentation.
References
- ^ del Hoyo, Josep; Elliott, Andrew; Sargatal, Jordi, eds. (1998). Handbook of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Ostrich to Ducks. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. p. 25.
- ^ See guideline at Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Animals, plants, and other organisms (MOS:LIFE). The topic of capitals has been discussed numerous, times and discussions may be found in the archives. (Examples: 10-1, 7-1, 7-2, 2-1, 2-2, 2–3). In 2014, a request for comments settled that lower case will be used, as is consistent with other taxa.