Wikipedia talk:WikiProject YouTube: Difference between revisions
added archives box |
slow down archive bot: keep 4 + archive 2 would be a plausible minimum for very high traffic project talk pages, keep 3 + archive 1 is insane for this page |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
||
| archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
| archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
||
| minthreadstoarchive = |
| minthreadstoarchive = 2 |
||
| minthreadsleft = |
| minthreadsleft = 4 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Auto archiving notice|age=14|small=no|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
{{Auto archiving notice|age=14|small=no|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
||
Revision as of 08:33, 19 January 2020
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject YouTube and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 7 September 2017. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | YouTube Project‑class | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Social Media Statistics
There is a proposal at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Social Media Statistics that will affect many articles within the scope of this project. Please share you thoughts there. Thryduulf (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Closed as no consensus. I didn't expect that. Well then I won't be changing the infobox for a while. I'm pretty sure that a proposal limited to infoboxes could pass, as the vast majority of discussion participants suggested. wumbolo ^^^ 09:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- I think it's a fair reading of the discussion. I made a crucial mistake in mandating style in addition to substance. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 12:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Missed that, IPs don't read WP:VPP. IMHO WP:NOTSTATS is clearer than this archived proposal. –84.46.53.86 (talk) 12:14, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Closing shop?
@Barkeep49 and Wumbolo: How about tagging this project as dead instead of semi-active? Asking you, because nobody else answered questions here, or did anything with the project page later. I'm familiar with the List of YouTubers including Emma Blackery, Emma Chamberlain, Hannah Witton, (maybe) Kim Iversen, and related articles such as YouTube Creator Awards or SitC.
Frankly, an almost dead project is not helpful, if you look at the following unanswered questions or tons of talk pages apparently guarded by this project in the case of AFDs or PRODs, but actually nobody cares. That's of course not your or my fault, but you are entitled to say no, not (yet) dead. –84.46.53.86 (talk) 12:14, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- I don't consider myself a member of this project and would have no opinion on what its status is. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
New discussion
New discussion on Talk:List of most-liked YouTube videos--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 08:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)