Jump to content

Talk:1917 (2019 film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment (B): Film, United States (Rater)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Refideas
{{Refideas
|1={{cite web|url=https://www.polygon.com/2019/11/26/20980602/1917-writer-krysty-wilson-cairns-sam-mendes-edgar-wright-movie-interview|title=1917 writer Krysty Wilson-Cairns funneled WWI obsessions into the single-shot epic|date=November 26, 2019|last=Bramesco|first=Charles|website=[[Polygon (website)|Polygon]] }}
|1={{cite web|url=https://www.polygon.com/2019/11/26/20980602/1917-writer-krysty-wilson-cairns-sam-mendes-edgar-wright-movie-interview|title=1917 writer Krysty Wilson-Cairns funneled WWI obsessions into the single-shot epic|date=November 26, 2019|last=Bramesco|first=Charles|website=[[Polygon (website)|Polygon]] }}
|2={{cite web|url=https://www.polygon.com/2020/1/5/21051257/sam-mendes-1917-behind-the-scenes-interview-one-shot-skyfall-spectre-comparisons|title=Sam Mendes on directing 1917: ‘We were completely in the lap of the gods’|date=January 5, 2020|last=Bramesco|first=Charles|website=[[Polygon (website)|Polygon]] }}
|3={{cite web|url=https://collider.com/1917-interview-krysty-cairns-wilson-how-to-write-a-one-shot-movie/|title=‘1917’ Co-Writer Krysty Wilson-Cairns Explains How to Write a One-Shot Movie|date=January 7, 2020|last=Chitwood|first=Adam|website=[[Collider (website)|Collider]] }}
|4={{cite web|url=https://collider.com/1917-ending-explained/|title=‘1917’ Co-Writer Breaks Down That Ending|date=January 10, 2020|last=Chitwood|first=Adam|website=[[Collider (website)|Collider]] }}
|5={{cite web|url=https://www.polygon.com/2020/1/11/21058903/how-1917-single-shot-worked-explained-roger-deakins-interview|title=The legendary Roger Deakins on what shooting the ‘single-shot’ 1917 actually involved|date=January 11, 2020|last=Bramesco|first=Charles|website=[[Polygon (website)|Polygon]] }}
|6={{cite web|url=https://collider.com/1917-george-mackay-dean-charles-chapman-interview-fyc/|title=Watch ‘1917’ Stars George Mackay and Dean-Charles Chapman’s ‘FYC’ Q&A|date=January 16, 2020|last=Sneider|first=Jeff|website=[[Collider (website)|Collider]] }}
|7={{cite web|url=https://collider.com/1917-movie-cut-scene-explained/|title=‘1917’ Co-Writer Krysty Wilson-Cairns on How That [SPOILER] Changes the Rest of the Film|date=January 17, 2020|last=Chitwood|first=Adam|website=[[Collider (website)|Collider]] }}
|8={{cite web|url=https://collider.com/1917-roger-deakins-sam-mendes-lee-smith-interview/|title=‘1917’s Roger Deakins, Sam Mendes and Editor Lee Smith Go In-Depth in 40-Minute Q&A|date=January 23, 2020|last=Weintraub|first=Steve|website=[[Collider (website)|Collider]] }}
}}
}}



Revision as of 02:00, 26 January 2020

WikiProject iconFilm: British / War / American B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the War films task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Cinema B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Why no “critical acclaim”?

There is an invisible comment on the page telling editors not to use “critical acclaim” to describe the critical response, could somebody explain why this is the case? Many other film pages use this, I don’t see why this one can’t? Fobz12345 (talk) 02:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

it’s awards season and competition for them is huge right now. I’d say just go ahead and use the phrase. Boscaswell talk 09:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reception section: undue weight to negative review

Rotten Tomatoes has 89% positive reviews, but 1 of the section’s 3 paras, taking up nearly 1/3rd of the section, is given over to a negative review. This is WP:UNDUE. Boscaswell talk 09:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've dealt with it.Boscaswell talk 00:19, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]