Talk:Jalatarangam: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:01, 12 December 2006

I agree. They both essentially refer to the same thing.Dv vignesh 07:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Yes, you are correct in assuming that they refere both to the same instrument. The jalatarangam article can be merged with jaltarang with an indication that it is the carnatic name for same instrument, differing in manner of manner of playing but consisting of equal number of bowls etc.59.95.101.61 08:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)ghnm[reply]

Revision as of 07:59, 6 December 2006 edit Dv vignesh (talk \| contribs) 240 edits ←Created page with 'I agree. They both essentially refer to the same thing.~~~~'		Revision as of 08:01, 12 December 2006 edit undo 59.95.101.61 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I agree. They both essentially refer to the same thing.[[User:Dv vignesh\|Dv vignesh]] 07:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)		I agree. They both essentially refer to the same thing.[[User:Dv vignesh\|Dv vignesh]] 07:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Yes, you are correct in assuming that they refere both to the same instrument. The jalatarangam article can be merged with jaltarang with an indication that it is the carnatic name for same instrument, differing in manner of manner of playing but consisting of equal number of bowls etc.[[User:59.95.101.61\|59.95.101.61]] 08:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)ghnm