Talk:Brooklyn: Difference between revisions
Smallbones (talk | contribs) |
MusikAnimal (talk | contribs) →The mystery of Brooklyn's pageviews: likely bot-inflated traffic |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
{{ping|Bri|Pharos|Jim.henderson|MusikAnimal|Kaldari|Igordebraga}}. That exhausts the set of folks I know of who might have some expertise in this area. [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]]<sub>([[User talk:Smallbones|<span style="color: #cc6600;">smalltalk</span>]])</sub> 22:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC) |
{{ping|Bri|Pharos|Jim.henderson|MusikAnimal|Kaldari|Igordebraga}}. That exhausts the set of folks I know of who might have some expertise in this area. [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]]<sub>([[User talk:Smallbones|<span style="color: #cc6600;">smalltalk</span>]])</sub> 22:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
:I suspect it's bot-inflated traffic. While [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=desktop&agent=user&start=2019-02-05&end=2020-02-05&pages=Brooklyn desktop] and [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-web&agent=user&start=2019-02-05&end=2020-02-05&pages=Brooklyn mobile web] show the same pattern, [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-app&agent=user&start=2019-02-05&end=2020-02-05&pages=Brooklyn mobile app] shows more normal fluctuations. I can only assume mobile app would mirror this the patterns of other platform types if it were genuine traffic. I live just across the river from Brooklyn and I personally can't come up with any explanation for this anomaly. <span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikAnimal</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 23:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:41, 6 February 2020
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brooklyn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
Brooklyn was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): R.Blecher (article contribs).
Archives |
---|
MOS:BOLDTITLE
I have reverted the un-bolding of "Kings County" in the title, again. Per MOS:BOLDTITLE: If an article's title is a formal or widely accepted name for the subject, display it in bold
. The county name does indeed need to be moved to the first sentence, but "Kings County" is a formal name and so should not be unbolded. Same for the other boroughs. epicgenius (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Russian and Ukrainian American
Ukrainians are not russians (muscovites), both are totally different nations, besides jews from eastern Europe is the third nation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.140.159.110 (talk) 18:34, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
The mystery of Brooklyn's pageviews
I'm wondering if anybody can think of an explanation for the strange behavior of the pageviews of Brooklyn. In January Brooklyn was the 35th most viewed page on the English Wikipedia. Starting about September the pageviews went from a few thousand each day to a high over 100,000 then fell to about 20,000 for about a month, and then back up to about 50,000 per day since Christmas. You can play with the chart here.
@Bri, Pharos, Jim.henderson, MusikAnimal, Kaldari, and Igordebraga:. That exhausts the set of folks I know of who might have some expertise in this area. Smallbones(smalltalk) 22:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- I suspect it's bot-inflated traffic. While desktop and mobile web show the same pattern, mobile app shows more normal fluctuations. I can only assume mobile app would mirror this the patterns of other platform types if it were genuine traffic. I live just across the river from Brooklyn and I personally can't come up with any explanation for this anomaly. — MusikAnimal talk 23:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- All unassessed articles
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- C-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- C-Class New York (state) articles
- High-importance New York (state) articles
- C-Class New York City articles
- Top-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- Top-importance New York (state) articles