Talk:Brooklyn: Difference between revisions

; Archives
	March 2004 – January 2006; ; ;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:41, 7 February 2020

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brooklyn article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Brooklyn was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 6, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 13, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state) High‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City Top‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state): Long Island Top‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Long Island, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Template:Vital article

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): R.Blecher (article contribs).

MOS:BOLDTITLE

I have reverted the un-bolding of "Kings County" in the title, again. Per MOS:BOLDTITLE: If an article's title is a formal or widely accepted name for the subject, display it in bold. The county name does indeed need to be moved to the first sentence, but "Kings County" is a formal name and so should not be unbolded. Same for the other boroughs. epicgenius (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Russian and Ukrainian American

Ukrainians are not russians (muscovites), both are totally different nations, besides jews from eastern Europe is the third nation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.140.159.110 (talk) 18:34, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The mystery of Brooklyn's pageviews

I'm wondering if anybody can think of an explanation for the strange behavior of the pageviews of Brooklyn. In January Brooklyn was the 35th most viewed page on the English Wikipedia. Starting about September the pageviews went from a few thousand each day to a high over 100,000 then fell to about 20,000 for about a month, and then back up to about 50,000 per day since Christmas. You can play with the chart here.

@Bri, Pharos, Jim.henderson, MusikAnimal, Kaldari, and Igordebraga:. That exhausts the set of folks I know of who might have some expertise in this area. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 22:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect it's bot-inflated traffic. While desktop and mobile web show the same pattern, mobile app shows more normal fluctuations. I can only assume mobile app would mirror this the patterns of other platform types if it were genuine traffic. I live just across the river from Brooklyn and I personally can't come up with any explanation for this anomaly. — MusikAnimal ^talk 23:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @MusikAnimal:. My question is why would anybody set up a bot to do this? If not "on purpose", doesn't it cost them some money to load the page 60,000 times a day for months at a time? I guess my question comes down to what is "bot-inflated traffic" and why do people do it, and if not on purpose, why don't they catch it. Thanks. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 01:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with MusikAnimal; no blip in Google Trends at the same time. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:41, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 :I suspect it's bot-inflated traffic. While [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=desktop&agent=user&start=2019-02-05&end=2020-02-05&pages=Brooklyn desktop] and [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-web&agent=user&start=2019-02-05&end=2020-02-05&pages=Brooklyn mobile web] show the same pattern, [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=mobile-app&agent=user&start=2019-02-05&end=2020-02-05&pages=Brooklyn mobile app] shows more normal fluctuations. I can only assume mobile app would mirror this the patterns of other platform types if it were genuine traffic. I live just across the river from Brooklyn and I personally can't come up with any explanation for this anomaly. <span style="font-family:sans-serif">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikAnimal</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 23:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 ::Thanks {{ping|MusikAnimal}}. My question is why would anybody set up a bot to do this?  If not "on purpose", doesn't it cost them some money to load the page 60,000 times a day for months at a time?  I guess my question comes down to what is "bot-inflated traffic" and why do people do it, and if not on purpose, why don't they catch it.  Thanks. [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]]<sub>([[User talk:Smallbones|<span style="color: #cc6600;">smalltalk</span>]])</sub> 01:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
+::Agree with MusikAnimal; no blip in Google Trends at the same time. ☆ [[User:Bri|Bri]] ([[User talk:Bri|talk]]) 01:41, 7 February 2020 (UTC)