Jump to content

Talk:Cocktail dress: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
→Merge?: Merging makes no sense to me.
Line 52: Line 52:


Shouldn't [[Party dress]] merge into [[Cocktail dress]]? [[User:PPEMES|PPEMES]] ([[User talk:PPEMES|talk]]) 11:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't [[Party dress]] merge into [[Cocktail dress]]? [[User:PPEMES|PPEMES]] ([[User talk:PPEMES|talk]]) 11:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
:Merging makes no sense to me. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 22:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:10, 7 February 2020

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconFashion Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen's History Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCulture Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joannnnna (article contribs).

Image

The old image Image:PromDress.JPG was only a Prom dress - not a classical Cocktail dress like Image:Cocktail dress 22209831.jpg. I've exchanged the images --Herrick 13:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, should've read this before reverting. Still, there ought to be an even better picture out there.... -- Smjg 23:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see problems with both images - the prom one is a poor pose and the dres isn't so good. the cocktail dress image can barely be seen. I took a look on Commons and flickr and came up with a few alternatives we could consider:

and a cc-by-sa 2.5 image on flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/iluvrhinestones/297039837/

My personal favorite is the first. -- SiobhanHansa 15:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh. Inspite the fact that the first picture Image:Helen Sjöholm.jpg is a "nice" dress, it only shows a typically dress from 1950! It misses the classic strong line. --Herrick 08:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Statement about men's attire

The statement that men may wear a dark suit to a semi-formal event is incorrect and should be removed. See Semi formal. In addition, it's off-topic in this article. Toddst1 (talk) 17:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

web site

Hi Leila, My apologies for the second undo, but I've removed the material you added from your website. While I can see you're trying to constructively contribute and you've solved the copyright problems, that material fails Wikipedia:Verifiability as WP:SPS. Bluntly, just because you published it on your website, doesn't make it true. Beyond that, the material is more of a style guide which we don't do per WP:HOWTO. While many folks think that type of info would be useful on Wikipedia, we have made a decision not to include that type of material. I hope this helps. Toddst1 (talk) 17:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toddst1, thanks for your notes. I'm still thinking about expanding of this article. This time I divided to consult with you first. I'm thinking about leaving History section with a reference to "da Cruz, Elyssa. "Dressing for the Cocktail Hour". In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000". As for rest of my content, I'm thinking about External Links section. Is such modification acceptable? WBR Leila Lynch 21:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Sounds like a great idea. Let me know if you need help with the Wikipedia:Citation templates. Good luck. Toddst1 (talk) 21:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the History section, as it was copied verbatim from the web site. See wp:copyvio. Rees11 (talk) 16:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see now that this material was removed once before and restored with a claim that it had been licensed for use here. But I don't see that on the source web page. Rees11 (talk) 21:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Ress11, for notice. I'm restoring material, since CC-BY-SA notice was restored (it was forgotten during site-migration) Leila Lynch 20:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LeilaLynch (talk • contribs)
You can't just include the material here. The license requires attribution at the very least. I would also request that you get consensus here on the talk page before adding this material, per wp:coi. Rees11 (talk) 20:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

  1. Da Cruz, Elyssa Schram. "Cocktail Dress." The Berg Companion to Fashion. Ed. Valerie Steele. Oxford: Bloomsbury Academic, 2010. Bloomsbury Fashion Central. Web. 31 Oct. 2017. https://www.bloomsburyfashioncentral.com/products/berg-fashion-library/encyclopedia/the-berg-companion-to-fashion/cocktail-dress.[1]
  2. Arnold Rebecca. Fashion, Desire, and Anxiety: Image and Morality in the Twentieth Century. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2001.[1]
  3. Kirkham Pat. Women Designers in the USA 1900–2000. New York: Yale University Press, 2000.[1]
  4. Milbank Rennolds. New York Fashion: The Evolution of American Style. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1989.[1]
  5. Seeling Charlotte. Fashion: The Century of the Designer, 1900–1999. Cologne, Germany: Konemann, 1999.[1]
  6. Steele Valerie. Paris Fashion: A Cultural History. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.[1]
  7. Dirix, Emmanuelle. Dressing the decades: twentieth-Century Vintage style. Yale, 2016.[1]

Joannnnna (talk) 11:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

Shouldn't Party dress merge into Cocktail dress? PPEMES (talk) 11:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merging makes no sense to me. Toddst1 (talk) 22:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g Cite error: The named reference undefined was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cocktail_dress&oldid=939664488"