Jump to content

Arithmetic topology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Further reading: Replaced a dead link with a valid one
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
2,565,133 edits
Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5
Line 10: Line 10:


==History==
==History==
In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110526230017/http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf |date=May 26, 2011 }}, 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718061649/http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html |date=July 18, 2011 }}, neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> and Kapranov<ref>M. Kapranov, [https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TOPa9irmsGsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA119 Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory], Progress in Math., 131, Birkhäuser, (1995), 119–151.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.
In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110526230017/http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf |date=May 26, 2011 }}, 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718061649/http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html |date=July 18, 2011 }}, neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs000290050015 Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> and Kapranov<ref>M. Kapranov, [https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TOPa9irmsGsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA119 Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory], Progress in Math., 131, Birkhäuser, (1995), 119–151.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 04:26, 13 February 2020

Arithmetic topology is an area of mathematics that is a combination of algebraic number theory and topology. It establishes an analogy between number fields and closed, orientable 3-manifolds.

Analogies

The following are some of the analogies used by mathematicians between number fields and 3-manifolds:[1]

  1. A number field corresponds to a closed, orientable 3-manifold
  2. Ideals in the ring of integers correspond to links, and prime ideals correspond to knots.
  3. The field Q of rational numbers corresponds to the 3-sphere.

Expanding on the last two examples, there is an analogy between knots and prime numbers in which one considers "links" between primes. The triple of primes (13, 61, 937) are "linked" modulo 2 (the Rédei symbol is −1) but are "pairwise unlinked" modulo 2 (the Legendre symbols are all 1). Therefore these primes have been called a "proper Borromean triple modulo 2"[2] or "mod 2 Borromean primes".[3]

History

In the 1960s topological interpretations of class field theory were given by John Tate[4] based on Galois cohomology, and also by Michael Artin and Jean-Louis Verdier[5] based on Étale cohomology. Then David Mumford (and independently Yuri Manin) came up with an analogy between prime ideals and knots[6] which was further explored by Barry Mazur.[7][8] In the 1990s Reznikov[9] and Kapranov[10] began studying these analogies, coining the term arithmetic topology for this area of study.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Sikora, Adam S. "Analogies between group actions on 3-manifolds and number fields." Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 78.4 (2003): 832-844.
  2. ^ Vogel, Denis (13 February 2004), Massey products in the Galois cohomology of number fields, urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-opus-44188
  3. ^ Morishita, Masanori (22 April 2009), Analogies between Knots and Primes, 3-Manifolds and Number Rings, arXiv:0904.3399, Bibcode:2009arXiv0904.3399M
  4. ^ J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).
  5. ^ M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole Archived May 26, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, 1964.
  6. ^ Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy? Archived July 18, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,
  7. ^ Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial, Barry Mazur, c.1964
  8. ^ B. Mazur, Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields, Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.
  9. ^ A. Reznikov, Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold), Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.
  10. ^ M. Kapranov, Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory, Progress in Math., 131, Birkhäuser, (1995), 119–151.

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Arithmetic_topology&oldid=940546019"