Jump to content

Neuro-linguistic programming: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 11: Line 11:
{{main|History of neuro-linguistic programming}}
{{main|History of neuro-linguistic programming}}
===1970s: Founding and early development===
===1970s: Founding and early development===
Unrelated to [[programming]] or [[neuroscience]]<ref name="Tosey Mathison 2003"/>, "Neuro-linguistic programming" denotes an interconnected relationship between [[mind]] and [[body]] (''neuro''), [[linguistics|language]] patterns (''linguistic''), and the organization of those parts into systemic patterns (''programming''). It was co-founded and developed jointly by [[Richard Bandler]] and UCLA associate professor of Linguistics [[John Grinder]] under the tutelage of noted [[anthropologist]] [[Gregory Bateson]], at the [[University of California, Santa Cruz]], during the 1960s and 1970s. At that time the Californian human potential seminars were developing into a viable industry. [[Alfred Korzybski]] had influenced Gregory Bateson and several schools of thought, including those at [[Esalen]] in California. Most notably, the idea that '[[the map is not the territory]]' and ideas about human modeling were adopted by Bandler and Grinder<ref name="structure1"/>. From 1972, the co-founders of NLP had an interest in the exceptional communications skills of gestalt therapist [[Fritz Perls]], family therapist [[Virginia Satir]] and founding president of the American Society for Clinical Hypnosis, [[Milton H. Erickson]]. Subsequently ''Structure of Magic Series (1975)'' and ''Patterns of Milton H. Erickson (1976, 1977)'' were published using those therapists as models. In the late 1970s, Leslie Cameron-Bandler, [[Judith DeLozier]], [[Robert Dilts]], and David Gordon worked with the co-founders and separately to contribute to the development of NLP.
Unrelated to computer [[programming]] or [[neuroscience]]<ref name="Tosey Mathison 2003"/>, "Neuro-linguistic programming" denotes an interconnected relationship between [[mind]] and [[body]] (''neuro''), [[linguistics|language]] patterns (''linguistic''), and the organization of those parts into systemic patterns (''programming''). It was co-founded and developed jointly by [[Richard Bandler]] and UCLA associate professor of Linguistics [[John Grinder]] under the tutelage of noted [[anthropologist]] [[Gregory Bateson]], at the [[University of California, Santa Cruz]], during the 1960s and 1970s. At that time the Californian human potential seminars were developing into a viable industry. [[Alfred Korzybski]] had influenced Gregory Bateson and several schools of thought, including those at [[Esalen]] in California. Most notably, the idea that '[[the map is not the territory]]' and ideas about human modeling were adopted by Bandler and Grinder<ref name="structure1"/>. From 1972, the co-founders of NLP had an interest in the exceptional communications skills of gestalt therapist [[Fritz Perls]], family therapist [[Virginia Satir]] and founding president of the American Society for Clinical Hypnosis, [[Milton H. Erickson]]. Subsequently ''Structure of Magic Series (1975)'' and ''Patterns of Milton H. Erickson (1976, 1977)'' were published using those therapists as models. In the late 1970s, Leslie Cameron-Bandler, [[Judith DeLozier]], [[Robert Dilts]], and David Gordon worked with the co-founders and separately to contribute to the development of NLP.


===1980s: Growth, spread, new developers, alternate styles, scientific assessment===
===1980s: Growth, spread, new developers, alternate styles, scientific assessment===

Revision as of 15:06, 13 December 2006

This article is about the personal development model. For the neuroscience, see neurolinguistics.

Template:TotallyDisputed

Neuro-linguistic
programming
Topics
Developers
Practitioners
Organisations

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a set of techniques, axioms and beliefs, that adherents use primarily as an approach to personal development. NLP was influenced by the ideas of the New Age era as well as beliefs in human potential. The initial ideas of NLP were developed around 1973 by Richard Bandler, a student, and John Grinder, a professor of linguistics, in association with the social scientist Gregory Bateson. The term "Neuro-linguistic programming" denotes a set of models and principles meant to explore how mind and neurology (neuro), language patterns (linguistic), and the organization of human perception and cognition into systemic patterns (programming) interact to create subjective reality and human behaviors.

NLP is based on the idea that if someone excels at something, we can learn how they do it and then teach it to others.[1] NLP has several ways to affect changes in the way we think, learn and communicate. [2] In principle all language and behaviors (whether functional or dysfunctional) is highly structured and even a dysfunctional behavior is trying to satisfy a positive intent at some level.[3]

History and development

Main article: History of neuro-linguistic programming

1970s: Founding and early development

Unrelated to computer programming or neuroscience[4], "Neuro-linguistic programming" denotes an interconnected relationship between mind and body (neuro), language patterns (linguistic), and the organization of those parts into systemic patterns (programming). It was co-founded and developed jointly by Richard Bandler and UCLA associate professor of Linguistics John Grinder under the tutelage of noted anthropologist Gregory Bateson, at the University of California, Santa Cruz, during the 1960s and 1970s. At that time the Californian human potential seminars were developing into a viable industry. Alfred Korzybski had influenced Gregory Bateson and several schools of thought, including those at Esalen in California. Most notably, the idea that 'the map is not the territory' and ideas about human modeling were adopted by Bandler and Grinder[1]. From 1972, the co-founders of NLP had an interest in the exceptional communications skills of gestalt therapist Fritz Perls, family therapist Virginia Satir and founding president of the American Society for Clinical Hypnosis, Milton H. Erickson. Subsequently Structure of Magic Series (1975) and Patterns of Milton H. Erickson (1976, 1977) were published using those therapists as models. In the late 1970s, Leslie Cameron-Bandler, Judith DeLozier, Robert Dilts, and David Gordon worked with the co-founders and separately to contribute to the development of NLP.

1980s: Growth, spread, new developers, alternate styles, scientific assessment

You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|section|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.
 With the 1980s, shortly after publishing Neuro-linguistic Programming Volume 1 with Robert Dilts and Judith Delozier, Grinder and Bandler fell out. Amidst acrimony and intellectual property lawsuits, NLP started to be developed haphazardly by many individuals, sometimes ethically, and sometimes opportunistically, often under multiple confusing brand names.[citation needed] There was even been some disagreement over who had originally named the field. For example, critic Margaret Singer quotes Bandler as saying that NLP was "phrased on the fly from several book titles on the floor of his car one night when a policeman asked his occupation."[5]. During the 1980s John Grinder developed a form of NLP called the New Code of NLP which attempted restore a whole body systemic approach to NLP. Richard Bandler also published new processes with submodalities as in Using Your Brain: For a Change (1984). Meanwhile Anthony Robbins who taught NLP in the late 1970s, began mass marketing products incorpoating aspects of NLP (renamed as Neuro Associative Conditioning). Other practitioners and trainers modified, renamed and developed their own variations of NLP. For example, Michael Hall offers NLP with Neurosemantics and Tad James with Time Line TherapyTM. While Tad James and Michael Hall are certainly well-known in the field of NLP, people like Judith DeLozier and Connirae and Stephen Andreas have been much more influential in its development. [citation needed] Given the multiplicity of developers and trainers, there was to be no single definitive system of NLP.[6]

In the late 1980s research reviews by Sharpley (1984, 1987) and by the United States National Research Council gave NLP an overall negative assessment. Thereafter, except for sporadic articles on NLP in different fields, there was a marked decrease in NLP research. Despite this, the use of NLP continued to grow.

1990s: divisions, controversy, marketing, etc

Whilst the NLP community has become splintered, most NLP material acknowledges the early work of the co-founders, Bandler and Grinder, and the development group that surrounded them in the 1970s. Around 2001, the law suits finally became settled. During the 1990s, tentative attempts were made to put NLP on a more formal and better regulated footing, in countries such as the UK. With different authors, individual trainers and practitioners having developed their own methods, concepts and labels, often branding them as "NLP":[7], the training standards and quality differed greatly. Around 1978, NLP practitioner certification was set up as a 20 day program with the aim of training therapists to apply NLP as an adjunct to their professional qualifications. In Europe, the European NLP therapy association has been promoting their training in line with European therapy standards. The length of training varies from a short hobby course, to a 20 day course, to longer courses for trainers and professionals. However the multiplicity and general lack of quality controls has led to NLP being labelled in unfavourable ways politically, for example in Germany, and becoming confusing for consumers.[8]

Concepts and methods

Eclectic field

Neuro-linguistic Programming is an eclectic field, and covers a wide array of aspects of personal development. There is less empirical or experimental support for these methods than for comparable approaches, and it relies on anecdotal evidence in support of its efficacy [citation needed]. Its methods deal with issues ranging from reframing negative beliefs, to dealing with stage fright by reducing simple phobias, and more generally, communications and motivational products. Some trainers offer techiques for psychotherapy, self-help, depression, or addiction, as well as peak performance assistance business or sports. In rare cases even subjects such as meditation or ESP are addressed.[citation needed] NLP as an approach to therapy has been frequently de-emphasized as the primary purpose for NLP. At the same time, others within the NLP community consider therapy to be a core application, and advocate its importance. NLP and its techniques have been widely adopted for use in motivational seminars, adult education, and management and sales training, often being mixed with pop psychology, as well as other applications outside of mainstream.

Modeling

Main article: Modeling (NLP)

Neuro-linguistic Programming has developed progressively since its early development by Bandler and Grinder (1979) to include the modeling of successful approaches of exceptional people in any field, together with a set of useful strategies for setting and achieving desired goals. As Bandler and Grinder state "the function of NLP modeling is to arrive at descriptions which are useful."[3] The purpose of modeling is to assimilate, through imitation, the behaviors of successful people, before transferring the skills to others or otherwise describing them. Belief, objectives, internal state and strategies can be described in terms of the organization and sequences of internal representations; they then have a discernible and communicable structure.[2][9] Since behavior and its substrates — internal state and strategy — can be imitated and then codified, a person's skill can be learned by others.[2] The aim of NLP modeling is to discover the elements of what the expert is doing of which the expert is not aware. [10]

Presuppositons

Main article: Principles of NLP

The philosophy of NLP can be summarised in the idea of Korzybski and Bateson that the map is not the territory. That is, rather than acting directly upon the world, we act based on our maps of the world. Because these maps are limited and do not always serve us, the job of an NLP practitioner is to increase choice and flexibility with these maps; and then in the world.[1] There are a number of aphoristic expressions which serve to construct practical models for learning and communication. NLP focuses on the present and thinks about past experiences, even failures, as resources so that there is no failure, only feedback. While this may not be necessarily true, by acting as if, for example, all human action has a positive intention it presupposes that at some level even the most negative behavior is attempting to express some positive intention. This serves as a means to arrive at what works rather than what is true and encourages the feedback cycle to drive the interactions. [11]. This is also evident in the aphorism, the meaning of your communication is in the response. This early stance of Bandler and Grinder could be seen as anti-theoretical; at the same time, it encourages the individual to be responsible for their own learning by way of enriching personal resources and by freeing up their impoverished maps of the world.[4]

Core techniques

Main articles: Anchoring, Rapport, Meta model, Reframing

Though techniques vary between schools there are some core NLP techniques that are shared. In order to communicate more influentially, physical mirroring of posture, breathing or verbal mirroring of keywords, and sensory specific language (predicates) is used to facilitate and maintain rapport during a conversation.[12] Furthermore, language pattern techniques from the meta model, such as how specifically and what specifically are used to elicit information or define outcomes for a client in psychotherapy, or more generally for information gathering in conversation. The meta model question may be combined with general language and use of metaphor, to induce trance, pace belief, and make interventions.

Numerous techniques have been designed for refining goals, elliciting resource states, or reframing negative beliefs. Most of these techniques rely on manipulating thinking processes or sequences of representational systems. One such technique called anchor involves associating a resourceful state to a certain touch. This resourceful state is then attached to a problem context by thinking about the problem context as the resourceful state is triggered by that same touch. [13] Other techniques encourage thinking about different aspects of goals and objectives. For example in Robert Dilts' Neurological levels, strategic vision, spiritual aspects or other beliefs, as well as effects the proposed changes may have in the environmental context may be considered, [14] whereas John Grinder, in New Code of NLP prefers to use the more general pattern of perceptual positions which temporily engages the points of view of others in a relationship by stepping into the shoes of the others involved[15].

Representational systems

Main article: Representational systems (NLP)

When people are involved in tasks, internal representations are being engaged at the same time. You may be making conversation, kicking a ball or riding a horse, and visual, auditory, kinesthetic (and possibly olfactory and gustatory), sequences of representations are being activated to different degrees. These representations are either recalled or constructed. [6] A person will also give away cues by way of eye gaze, breathing patterns or verbal predicates, as to what representational system is currently being predominately used. Robert Dilts[9] summarises the cues as to what representational systems are being used in the BAGEL model:

  • Body posture (Head position, and lean)
  • Accessing cues (Changes in tone and tempo of voice)
  • Gestures (Timing, and position of gestures)
  • Eye movements (The direction of and movement of eyes)
  • Language patterns (Sensory specific language, for example, Visual: "to clearly understand" or Kinesthetic: "to grasp a concept")

Additionally, hemispheric differences (Lateralization of brain function) have been used to support the theory of representational systems in NLP. For instance, Robert Dilts once proposed that eye movements (and sometimes gestures) correspond to visual/auditory/kinesthetic representations and thus to sides of the brain. It has been claimed that eye movements to the left correspond with recalled memory, while eye movements to the right indicate construction. Representational systems are then connected to logic, analysis, and creative, imaginative duality.[16] Modern neuroscience indicates that early NLP's notions of neurology were overly simplistic with regard to these left/right brain hemispheric differences.[17][9][18] Further, there is little substantive evidence to support the idea that people have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. [19]

Submodalities

Main article: Submodalities (NLP)

A fundamental idea in NLP is that rather than responding to the world directly, we respond to our maps of the world. Internal imagery is a common theme in personal development, psychotherapy and sports. NLP adds to this the idea of submodalities[4], that is the subjective size, location and brightness of internal imagery, the volume and location of internal sounds, and the location and intensity of other sensations. A change in the submodalities will change the maps and then the way we respond in the world.[20]. For example, the swish pattern is a visualization technique designed to change behaviors by switching (or swishing) the cue stimulus for an unwanted behaviour with the self-image doing a desired alternate behavior. [21] As with most techniques, the imagined consequences of any proposed changes are also normally considered within a framework of ecology.[21]

Milton model

Main article: Milton model

Several expressions can be traced to specific models in NLP, such as Milton Erickson. Bandler and Grinder (1976) state that Erickson was able to build rapport with his client by mirroring physical and verbal patterns. To model this requires attention being placed primarily on the client's responses. They also borrowed Erickson's notion of conscious and unconscious mind.[1]

NLP was in part derived from the work of Milton H. Erickson[22]. Subsquently, those who emphasise the therapeutic application often use terminology borrowed from Erickson. They focus on hypnotic phenomena, such as, the use of unconscious communications, therapeutic metaphor, post-hypnotic suggestion, pain control, age regression, and enhanced sensory perception.

Ecology

An essential principle in some NLP trainings, ecology involves being attentive to the requirements and requests of all people effected by a proposed change and taking into consideration their point of view and circumstances in addition to one's own objectives. Explicit ecological checks feature in some NLP techniques. For example, the six step reframe specifically asks if there is any objection to a proposed change before continuing with the process. More generally, ecological thinking encourages the exploration of behavior and how changes in behavior might have follow on consequences in the environment or with other people involved. If there are any objections, alternative resolutions may be found.[3] The same process has been applied to business or conflict resolution and in this case could also be seen as a win-win philosophy. The term "ecology" (borrowed in the sense of "how disparate things co-exist in balance")[This quote needs a citation] is used to signify the careful checking needed to ensure that all aspects of a situation are taken into account, such as the well-being of others involved, the ethics of the work done, the beneficial nature of goals sought, any secondary gains affected, and so on.[23] Bateson's influence can be found in map-territory, as well as systemic ideas that life mind and body are highly interconnected systems.[15][24] and that multiple descriptions are better than one.

Reception of NLP

Views of critics in various disciplines

Research reviews in the late 1980s suggested the techniques and underlying theory of NLP were both empirically unvalidated and unsupported.[25] Subsequent peer-reviewed psychological and experimental NLP literature has been sporadic. While it has been coordinated within some psychotherapy and industry associations, NLP has remained an eclectic field with no inherent controls over training and ethical standards.[citation needed] Moreover evidence-based psychologists (eg. Lilienfeld, Beyerstein) are concerned about the adoption of scientifically unvalidated techniques such as NLP in the mental health profession and also the spread of misconceptions about how the mind works.[26]

Elich et al (1985) stated that "NLP has achieved something akin to a cult status when it may be nothing more than another psychological fad" (p.625)."[27] (p.625). NLP has been criticized by some clinical psychologists, management scholars, linguists, and psychotherapists, concerning ineffectiveness, pseudoscientific explanation of linguistics and neurology, ethically questionable practices, promotion by exaggerated claims, and promises of extraordinary therapeutic results. Some reviews have characterized NLP as mass-marketed psychobabble.[18][28] Sanghera, a columnist for Financial Times (London, 2005) writes, "critics say NLP is simply a half-baked conflation of pop psychology and pseudoscience that uses jargon to disguise the fact that it is based on a set of banal, if not incorrect, presuppositions"[29]

Views of supporters in various disciplines

Research reviews

Main articles: NLP and science, List of studies on Neuro-linguistic programming

A comprehensive literature review by Sharpley (1984) found no empirical evidence to support NLP techniques and models including preferred representational systems (PRS) and predicate matching.[30] However, Einspruch and Forman (1985) contended that the research reviewed by Sharpley (1984) contained a number of methodological errors. They argued that the researchers lacked a full understanding of pattern recognition in an experienced NLP context and furthermore, that there was inadequate control of context, an unfamiliarity with NLP as an approach to therapy, inadequate definitions of rapport and numerous logical mistakes in the research methodology.[31] Sharpley then (1987) rebutted with additional experimental evidence to demonstrate that the methods and models of NLP were ineffective and may be untestable.[25]. In 1988 a report from the United States National Research Council (a board of 14 prepared scientific experts), found that "individually, and as a group, these studies fail to provide an empirical base of support for NLP assumptions...or NLP effectiveness. The committee cannot recommend the employment of such an unvalidated technique". They also found no support for influence of NLP (including matching representational systems to gain rapport), however the idea of modeling of expertise appeared to have some merit[6]. Moreover "instead of being grounded in contemporary, scientifically derived neurological theory, NLP is based on outdated metaphors of brain functioning and is laced with numerous factual errors".

Mental health practice

NLP is used or suggested as an approach by some mental health bodies, including the National Phobics Society of Great Britain.[32] MIND,[33] USU: Student Health and Wellness Center,[34] the British Stammering Association, the Center for Development & Disability at the University of New Mexico Center for autism,[35] and Advocates of Child Abuse Survivors[36]. There has been little scientific research conducted to evaluate these NLP techniques for use in psychological care and interventions (psychotherapy). A notable example is V/KD or the cinema technique which has been taught alongside other "promising treatments" in trauma workshops. Other so called "power therapies" led by Professor Charles Figley include Thought Field Therapy or Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, Emotional Freedom Technique and Traumatic Incident Reduction. These "power therapies" have been criticised for lacking substantive clinical support and for being pseudoscientific [37]

Proponents of NLP use scientific sounding language and make exaggerated claims whilst relying on anecdotal evidence and testimonials, and there has been and remains a lack of peer reviewed literature.[38] Furthermore, there have even been suggestions that NLP may be an untestable theory[25]. According to Eisner, NLP is also based on some of Freud's most flawed thinking and has "not stood the test of time. There was great initial enthusiasm, but as time passed, it appears the so-called effective results have diminished or disappeared" [39][dubious – discuss] Clinical psychologists have identified characteristics that help to separate unvalidated or scientifically unsupported approaches to psychotherapy from those based on the scientific method. According to Lilienfeld (2002) the majority of interventions in the psychotherapy and mental health context, including NLP, are unvalidated or scientifically unsupported which threatens to undermine the reliability of mental health practice.[26].

Commercialization

NLP is sometimes marketed as a science. This is especially evident in the popular titles such as NLP: The New Technology of Achievement. It is also evident in some marketing and advertising of NLP.[40] Clinical psychologist Margaret Singer criticises NLP for appealing to science to raise its profile, stating that "none of the NLP developers have done any research to prove their models correct though NLP promoters and advertisers continue to call the originators scientists and use such terms as science, technology and hi-tech psychology in describing NLP"(p.172). Steve Salerno is more critical of NLP, portraying NLP as simply part of the self-help movement. Salerno uses the acronym "SHAM": the Self-Help and Actualization Movement and describes self-help as ineffective and potentially socially harmful.[41]

Corballis argues that "NLP is a thoroughly fake title, designed to give the impression of scientific respectability. NLP has little to do with neurology, linguistics, or even the respectable subdiscipline of neurolinguistics".[17] Psycholinguist Willem Levelt states that (translated into English by Pieter Drenth) "NLP is not informed about linguistics literature, it is based on vague insights that were out of date long ago, their linguistics concepts are not properly construed or are mere fabrications, and conclusions are based upon the wrong premises. NLP theory and practice has nothing to do with neuroscientific insights or linguistics, nor with informatics or theories of programming".[18][42] In the skeptics dictionary, Robert Carroll states that it is impossible to determine a "correct" NLP model.[7]

Implied religiosity and spirituality

Of NLP, Sociologist and Christian scholar, Stephen J Hunt says "it is a technique rather than an organised religion and is used by several different human potential movements" yet that it has an "implied religiosity".(p.195).[43] Skeptics have described NLP as simply a "New Age" development, especially given its apparent lack of empirical evidence, but this also has religious connotations.[44][26] For instance, NLP practitioners have attempted to model spiritual experiences, which are inherently subjective, lacking in scientific support. Regarding spiritual practices, Dilts states that John Grinder was influenced by Carlos Castaneda's Don Juan[9] in developing the "double hypnotic induction, perceptual positions", and "moving energies into other realities" (p.143). At the same time Grinder contends that any venture into personal beliefs of "spirituality" in psychotherapy or NLP would be an ethical violation. [24] Dilts' 'Neurological Levels of Learning' are sometimes associated with the chakras with spirit linked to the crown chakra. David V. Barrett (2001) states that "the brief biographies of NLP Trainers usually give the names of the people they have trained under, this could be seen as similar to new Eastern origin religions tracing themselves back through a progression of gurus"[45](p.434), he states in his work The New Believers: A Survey of Sects, Cults and Alternative Religions, NLP is not included as a religion; it is described as a technique or series of techniques, or a process. It is used by some religions, and NLP as a philosophy does exhibit some characteristics which are sometimes found in some religions, but "overall the balance comes down against it being labelled as a religion."(p.26)[45]

Manipulation and ethical concerns

NLP is sometimes referred to by journalists and researchers as a kind of cult or psychocult.[46][47][48][49][50][39][25][dubious – discuss] A German educational authority banned the use of NLP in their area and stated that it has a close similarity to Scientology.[48][citation needed] NLP has also been described by Margaret Singer as a commercial cult, and has been criticised within the business sector for being coercive.[46]

Critics say NLP is adopted as a pretext for applying ritual, authority control, dissociation, reduced rationalization, and social pressure to obtain compliance or to induce dependence.[49] According to Devilly (2005) it is common for pseudoscientific developments to set up a granfalloon in order to promote in-group rituals and jargon, and to attack critics.[37] Ethical concerns of NLP’s encouragement towards manipulation have been raised by exaggerated book titles such as The Unfair Advantage: Sell with NLP and NLP the New Art and Science of Getting What You Want. In contrast, therapy and coaching fields require an ethical code of conduct (eg: Psychotherapy and Counseling Federation of Australia Ethical Guidelines).

In addition, Beyerstein states that "ethical standards bodies and other professional associations state that unless a technique, process, drug, or surgical procedure can meet requirements of clinical tests, it is ethically questionable to offer it to the public, especially if money is to change hands"[citation needed]. Salerno has criticised NLP for unethically encouraging the belief in non existent maladies and insecurities by otherwise normal individuals [need quotation to verify]. For example, Salerno highlights a contradiction in the fact of Tony Robbins divorce given that Robbins had been a proponent of NLP and had marketed products for the "perfect marriage". This has disenchanted followers of Robbins.[41] Drenth (2003) explains that NLP is driven by economic motives and "manipulation of credulity" of clients, and explains that "often pseudoscientific practices are motivated by loathsome pursuit of gain". Drenth clarifies this with reference to the well known "financial exploitation of the victims of scientology, Avatar and similar movements".

Human resources

Human resource experts such as Von Bergen et al (1997) consider NLP to be inappropriate for management and human resource training [51][citation needed]. Within management training there have been complaints concerning pressured adoption of fundamental beliefs tantamount to a forced religious conversion.[46] [need quotation to verify]

Education

  • Craft (2001) suggests that NLP takes a social constructivist approach to learning theory whereby instructors have to adapt to the role of facilitators and not teachers.[14]. In this approach the students take responsibility for their own states, and learning experience.
  • Beyerstein[44] states that a method should be supported using controlled studies before it is applied in education.

Notes and references

  1. ^ a b c d Bandler, Richard & John Grinder (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book About Language and Therapy. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.
  2. ^ a b c Dilts, Robert B, Grinder, John, Bandler, Richard & DeLozier, Judith A. (1980). Neuro-Linguistic Programming: Volume I - The Study of the Structure of Subjective Experience. Meta Publications. pp. 3–4, 6, 14, 17.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ a b c Bandler, Richard & John Grinder (1979). Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming. Moab, UT: Real People Press. pp. 15, 24, 30, 45, 52.
  4. ^ a b c Tosey, P. Jane Mathison (2003) Neuro-linguistic Programming and learning theory: a response The Ciriculum Journal Vol.14 No.3 p.371-388
  5. ^ Singer, Margaret & Janja Lalich (1997). Crazy Therapies: What Are They? Do They Work?. Jossey Bass. 0787902780. {{cite book}}: Text "p.169" ignored (help)
  6. ^ a b c Druckman and Swets (eds) (l988) Enhancing Human Performance: Issues, Theories, and Techniques, National Academy Press.
  7. ^ a b Carroll, Robert T. "The Skeptic's Dictionary". . Retrieved 2003. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  8. ^ Peter Schütz () A consumer guide through the multiplicity of NLP certification training: A European perspective
  9. ^ a b c d Dilts & Delozier (2000) The Encyclopedia of Systemic NLP
  10. ^ Jacobson, S. (1994) "Neuro-Linguistic Programming" INFO-LINE, American Society For Training and Development, . Adapted from [1]
  11. ^ Vaihinger, H. "The Philosophy of "As If." (originally published, 1924)". Routledge, Kegan and Paul Ltd, London, England. -. Retrieved -. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  12. ^ John Clabby, PhD; Robert O’Connor, MD (2005) "Teaching Learners to Use Mirroring: Rapport" Journal of Family Medicine Vol. 36, No. 8 p.541
  13. ^ Krugman, Martin, et al., (1985): "Neuro-linguistic programming treatment for anxiety: Magic or myth?." Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Aug, Vol. 53(4) pp. 526-530.
  14. ^ a b Craft, A. (2001) The Ciriculum Journal Vol.12(1) pp.125-136 Cite error: The named reference "Craft 2001" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  15. ^ a b Grinder, John & Judith DeLozier (1987). Turtles All the Way Down: Prerequisites to Personal Genius. Scots Valley, CA: Grinder & Associates. p. pp.xx,xxi,xix,62,197. ISBN 1-55552-022-7.
  16. ^ Bandler, Richard, John Grinder, Judith Delozier (1977). Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. Volume II. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications. pp. p.10, 81, 87. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ a b Corballis, M. in Sala (ed) (1999) Mind Myths. Exploring Popular Assumptions About the Mind and Brain Author: Sergio Della Sala Publisher: Wiley, John & Sons ISBN 0-471-98303-9 p.41
  18. ^ a b c Drenth, J.D. (2003). [Pieter J.D. Drenth (2003) Growing anti-intellectualism in Europe; a menace to science in ALLEA Annual Report pp.60-72
  19. ^ Hines, Terence (1987). Left Brain/Right Brain Mythology and Implications for Management and Training. The Academy of Management Review, 12:4, 600-606.
  20. ^ Bandler, Richard (1985). [- Using your brain - for a change]. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books. pp. -. -. {{cite book}}: Check |url= value (help)
  21. ^ a b Masters, B Rawlins, M, Rawlins, L, Weidner, J. (1991) "The NLP swish pattern: An innovative visualizing technique. Journal of Mental Health Counseling. Vol 13(1) Jan 1991, 79-90. "
  22. ^ Gorton, Gregg E (2005). Milton Hyland Erickson The American Journal of Psychiatry. Washington. Vol.162, Iss. 7; pg. 1255, 1 pgs
  23. ^ This usage can also be seen in Gregory Bateson's 1972 collection Steps to an Ecology of Mind, published around the same time NLP was being developed.
  24. ^ a b Grinder, John & Carmen Bostic St Clair (2001.). Whispering in the Wind. CA: J & C Enterprises. pp. 127, 171, 222, ch.3, Appendix. -. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  25. ^ a b c d Sharpley C.F. (1987). "Research Findings on Neuro-linguistic Programming: Non supportive Data or an Untestable Theory". Communication and Cognition. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1987 Vol. 34, No. 1: 103–107, 105.
  26. ^ a b c (Lilienfeld 2002)Our Raison d’etre 2002 Vol 1(1) Cite error: The named reference "Lilienfeld 2002" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  27. ^ Elich, M., Thompson, R. W., & Miller, L. (1985). Mental imagery as revealed by eye movements and spoken predicates: A test of neurolinguistic programming. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(4), 622-625.
  28. ^ Williams, W F. general editor. (2000) Encyclopedia of pseudoscience: From alien abductions to Zone Therapy, Publisher: Facts On File, New York.
  29. ^ Look into my eyes and tell me I'm learning not to be a loser, Financial Times, London (UK), Sanghera. [url=http://news.ft.com/cms/s/770f7e96-15cd-11da-8085-00000e2511c8.html]
  30. ^ Sharpley, C. F. (1984). Predicate matching in NLP: A review of research on the preferred representational system. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(2), 238-248.
  31. ^ Einspruch, E. L., & Forman, B. D. (1985). Observations Concerning Research Literature on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(4), 589-596. See also: [2]
  32. ^ Cite web: National Phobics Society of Great Britain: List of treatments and help
  33. ^ Cite Web:Mental Health Promotions: How to Assert Yourself(PDF)
  34. ^ Cite Web: USU The Student Health and Wellness Center: What are Eating Disorders?
  35. ^ Cite Web: Center for Development & Disability at the University of New Mexico Center for autism
  36. ^ Cite Web: Advocates of Child Abuse Survivors: Counselling and therapy
  37. ^ a b Grant J. Devilly (2005) Power Therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry Vol.39 p.437 Cite error: The named reference "devilly" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  38. ^ Krugman, Kirsch, Wickless, Milling, Golicz, & Toth (1985). Neuro-linguistic programming treatment for anxiety: Magic or myth? Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. Vol 53(4), 526-530.
  39. ^ a b Eisner, D. (2000) The Death of Psychotherapy: From Freud to Alien Abductions
  40. ^ Stop smoking claims by hypnotherapists
  41. ^ a b Steve Salerno (2005) Sham: How the Self-Help Movement Made America Helpless, ISBN 1-4000-5409-5 Cite error: The named reference "salerno" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  42. ^ Willem Levelt (1996) Hoedt u voor Neuro-Linguïstisch Programmeren! Skepter Vol.9(3)
  43. ^ Hunt, Stephen J. (2003) Alternative Religions: A Sociological Introduction ISBN 0-7546-3410-8
  44. ^ a b Beyerstein.B.L (1990). "Brainscams: Neuromythologies of the New Age" (PDF). International Journal of Mental Health. 19(3): 27–36, 27.
  45. ^ a b David V. Barrett (2001) The New Believers: A Survey of Sects, Cults and Alternative Religions Available online from Google Books.
  46. ^ a b c Singer, Margaret (1995). Cults in Our Midst : The Continuing Fight Against Their Hidden Menace. New York, NY: Jossey Bass. ISBN 0-7879-6741-6.
  47. ^ Novopashin, A (2004) Totalitarian Sects and the Democratic State in International Conference in Novosibirsk: 9-11
  48. ^ a b Michael Sommer (1998) Esoterischer Spuk oder effektive Lehrmethoden?
  49. ^ a b Michael D Langone (Ed). (1993.). Recovery from Cults: Help for Victims of Psychological and Spiritual Abuse. New York, NY: W W Norton & Company. -. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  50. ^ Tippet, Gary (3 April 1994). "Inside the cults of mind control". Melbourne, Australia: Sunday Age. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  51. ^ [3] Von Bergen et al (1997)

Further reading

Main article: Neuro-linguistic programming: Bibliography
  • Andreas, Steve & Charles Faulkner (Eds.) (1996). NLP: the new technology of achievement. New York, NY: HarperCollins. ISBN 0-688-14619-8.
  • Bandler, Richard & John Grinder (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book About Language and Therapy. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books. ISBN 0-8314-0044-7.
  • Grinder, John & Richard Bandler (1975). The Structure of Magic II: A Book About Communication and Change. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books. ISBN 0-8314-0049-8.
  • Dilts, Robert B & Judith A DeLozier (2000). Encyclopaedia of Systemic Neuro-Linguistic Programming and NLP New Coding. NLP University Press. ISBN 0-9701540-0-3.

See also

Skeptics

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Neuro-linguistic_programming&oldid=94063267"