Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kowloon Development Company: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:44, 21 February 2020

Kowloon Development Company

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither the given links nor my searches are showing anything to demonstrate notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. GSS ^💬 13:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 13:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 13:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per sources could be found to verify its notability.WikiAviator (talk) 13:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which source establish notability under WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH? GSS ^💬 13:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I’m definitely not seeing the requisite sources to establish notability, either in this article or in its sister article on zhwiki. Whether they exist on the web, I can’t really tell because I’m not that good at Chinese. But from what I can understand, I don’t see WP:SIGCOV. All that said, this might not be so surprising for a company founded in the 60s; if there is significant coverage it could be both offline and in Chinese. If so, I urge the page creator to focus on providing that coverage. Otherwise I think it is extremely likely this page will be deleted at the end of 7 days. 199.66.69.88 (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment@199.66.69.88 @GSS I've found credible sources by prominent newspapers in Chinese that have whole articles about the projects of Kowloon Development Company. Sources: [1][2][3][4][5][6]. They are all reliable sources that can verify notability of the company. Therefore the article complies with WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH.WikiAviator (talk) 14:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment added sources to article. Should be able to meet notability guidelines.WikiAviator (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiAviator, searching for "九龍建業有限公司" in the sources you provided above I found nothing. What they are about? GSS ^💬 15:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS Hong Kong press sometimes refer the company as 九龍建業 or even 九建. Therefore you may find nothing if you search for 九龍建業有限公司.WikiAviator (talk) 15:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 :*'''Comment''' added sources to article. Should be able to meet notability guidelines.[[User:WikiAviator|WikiAviator]] ([[User talk:WikiAviator|talk]]) 14:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 ::*WikiAviator, searching for "九龍建業有限公司" in the sources you provided above I found nothing. What they are about? [[User:GSS|<span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS</span>]]&#x202F;[[User talk:GSS|<sup>&#128172;</sup>]] 15:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
-:::@{{U|GSS}}Hong Kong press sometimes refer the company as 九龍建業 or even 九建. Therefore you may find nothing if you search for 九龍建業有限公司.[[User:WikiAviator|WikiAviator]] ([[User talk:WikiAviator|talk]]) 15:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
+:::@{{U|GSS}} Hong Kong press sometimes refer the company as 九龍建業 or even 九建. Therefore you may find nothing if you search for 九龍建業有限公司.[[User:WikiAviator|WikiAviator]] ([[User talk:WikiAviator|talk]]) 15:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)