Jump to content

Remittitur: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
issues
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{multiple issues| The definition of Remittitur is also not complete. A Remittitur is also a ruling, issue by an appellate court to the trial court, informing the trial court when its ruling has been reversed.
{{multiple issues|
{{no lead|date=July 2019}}
{{no lead|date=July 2019}}
{{more references|date=July 2019}}
{{more references|date=July 2019}}

Revision as of 03:06, 1 March 2020

A remittitur is a ruling by a judge (usually upon motion to reduce or throw out a jury verdict) lowering the amount of damages granted by a jury in a civil case. Usually, this is because the amount awarded exceeded the amount demanded. The term is sometimes used for a reduction in awarded damages even when the amount awarded did not exceed the amount demanded, but is otherwise considered excessive. An example of the latter is the high-profile file-sharing court case Capitol v. Thomas.

If the motion is granted, the plaintiff may either accept the reduced verdict or submit to a new trial restricted to the matter of damages.

The term is also sometimes used in place of "remand" or a mandate—that is, moving a case from a higher court to a lower court.[1] Notably, under California law, the Court of Appeal issues a remittitur after an appeal is heard and decided. In contrast, the U.S. federal Courts of Appeals issue a mandate.

See also

  • Additur is a raising of the jury verdict. It is not allowed in the United States federal system due to Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474 (1935),[2] but certain states continue to allow it.

References

  1. ^ [1]
  2. ^ "Dimick v. Scheidt, 293 U.S. 474 (1935)". Google Scholar. Retrieved 2010-10-24.