Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DM Ashura (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:55, 14 December 2006

DM Ashura

The subject of this article does not meet WP:MUSIC. Under the criteria for musicians and ensembles, he could meet number 10, but I disagree with the notion that any of the appearances in games were notable enough to require more than a passing notion in the respective articles, especially considering the great amount of minor artists that are featured in things such as Dance Dance Revolution. The article is not referenced properly, with most of the references being to trivial web sources. The article's subject has been actively editing the article. Voretus ^talk 20:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy_keep This falls under the guidelines of Speedy_keep #3, the end of sentence 2: "making nominations of the same article with the same arguments after they were strongly rejected". There was a split consensus for the last nomination, where notability was majority keep and verifiability was majority delete. This has been settled though, since {{unreliable}} has been removed and all of the sources ARE, in fact, nontrivial.

Comment the consensus wasn't to keep; there was none. Voretus ^talk 20:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Edit: The last time I checked, when it was last nominated for deletion, the majority of users DID agree to keep the page.Bkid 20:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :{{la|DM Ashura}} <includeonly> — ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DM Ashura (2nd nomination)|View AfD]])</includeonly>
 The subject of this article does not meet [[WP:MUSIC]]. Under the criteria for musicians and ensembles, he could meet number 10, but I disagree with the notion that any of the appearances in games were notable enough to require more than a passing notion in the respective articles, especially considering the great amount of minor artists that are featured in things such as Dance Dance Revolution. The article is not referenced properly, with most of the references being to trivial web sources. The article's subject has been actively editing the article. [[User:Voretus|<font color="Green">Voretus</font>]][[User talk:Voretus|<font color="Purple"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
+:'''[[Speedy_keep]]''' This falls under the guidelines of [[Speedy_keep]] #3, the end of sentence 2: "making nominations of the same article with the same arguments after they were strongly rejected". There was a split consensus for the last nomination, where notability was majority '''keep''' and verifiability was majority '''delete'''. This has been settled though, since <nowiki>{{unreliable}}</nowiki> has been removed and all of the sources ARE, in fact, nontrivial.
-:'''Keep'''. I believe that this article DOES meet #10 under the criteria for musicians and ensembles, and we've already gone through this once before. It's been considered for deletion and kept once already, there should be enough to that page to keep it from deletion ''again''. [[User:Bkid|Bkid]] 20:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 ::'''Comment''' the consensus wasn't to keep; there was none. [[User:Voretus|<font color="Green">Voretus</font>]][[User talk:Voretus|<font color="Purple"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 :::'''Comment'''. Edit: The last time I checked, when it was last nominated for deletion, the majority of users DID agree to keep the page.[[User:Bkid|Bkid]] 20:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
-::::'''Comment'''. This also falls under the guidelines of [[Speedy_keep]] #3, the end of sentence 2.  [[User:Bkid|Bkid]] 21:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)