Jump to content

Talk:Amy Heckerling: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Removal of content: new section
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m top: Task 24 - template replacement following a TfD
Line 9: Line 9:
}}{{Image requested|people of the United States}}
}}{{Image requested|people of the United States}}


{{ArtAndFeminism2014 article}}
{{ArtAndFeminism article|2014}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Emory_University/Women_Filmmakers_(Spring_2018) | assignments = [[User:Lyavari|Lyavari]] }}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Emory_University/Women_Filmmakers_(Spring_2018) | assignments = [[User:Lyavari|Lyavari]] }}



Revision as of 13:56, 18 March 2020

WikiProject iconArt+Feminism
WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved at an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon in 2014.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lyavari (article contribs).

Quotes and style

Kudos to all who researched and wrote this biographical article. I haven't read it from start to finish, but in organizing it under headings and subheadings today (for clarity, timeline, and to break it up a bit on the page), I noticed a lot of quotes and wordy information throughout. It reads a bit like a feature interview, which is fine in its place, but I wouldn't consider it "encyclopedic" in style. If I were to go in and make it more of a fact-based article and less of a personal interview, I hope that would be OK. Heckerling is a great subject and her quotes are interesting and bring a lot to her biography, so I'd leave the majority in place, but just work on making it more of a career-focused encyclopedic article in style and scope. --Utilizer (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amy Heckerling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content

Hi Mdriscoll03, when you made this edit you removed content without explaining why. I have some ideas as to why, such as some of the sourcing not really backing up the content, but I was wondering if you could elaborate on this since it did remove a large chunk of content. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]