Jump to content

User talk:Tseung kang 99: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
←Replaced content with '{{retired}}'
Tag: Replaced
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{retired}}
{{retired}}

== Renaming ==
Hello! The use of multiple accounts is not allowed, thus, you have to choose between these two accounts: {{u|Tseung kang 99}} (formerly {{u|Abcbabc11111}}) and {{u|Iloveviolin45}} (formerly {{u|Whong922}}) and forget the other one. Thanks. [[User:Céréales Killer|I am not a number]] ([[User talk:Céréales Killer|talk]]) 08:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

== Tseung kang 99, you are invited to the Teahouse! ==


{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- valign="top"
| [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0]]
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''Tseung kang 99'''! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. <br />Be our guest at [[w:WP:teahouse|the Teahouse]]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|Lectonar}} ([[User_talk:Lectonar|talk]]).

<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">[[WP:Teahouse|Visit the Teahouse]]</span></div>

<div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there!

<small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the [[WP:Teahouse/Hosts|Teahouse hosts]]</small>

<small>16:04, 4 December 2018 (UTC)</small></div>
</div>
|}
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation -->
{{UTRS-unblock-user|25062|May 06, 2019 01:33:09|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 01:33, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
: {{tps}} Note: the user pushed copyvio to Wikipedia. Moreover, uploaded copyvio to Commons, some deliberately in the [[Portable Network Graphics|PNG format]] to hinder detection. Where does the user admit wrongdoing? [[User:Incnis Mrsi|Incnis Mrsi]] ([[User talk:Incnis Mrsi|talk]]) 07:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|I have waited a few months now for this account to get unblocked as informed by the arbitration committee. I did not intend for any spam at all. It was my first time to publish a wiki page and I was in learning steps to use it. Plz let me know if any actions are required for it to get unblocked.|decline=This request does not address your use of multiple accounts and addition of copyright violations. Moreover, what will you edit about if unblocked? [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 09:00, 6 May 2019 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|1=I am well aware that I violated rules regarding the use of multiple accounts and addition of copyright violations issues. As noted to the arbitration committee earlier, these happened because I was new to the platform. I will abide to the rules of Wikipedia moving forward. For example, I waited a few months as suggested by arbitration committee before requesting unblock. I intend to mainly involved in subjects that I am interested, such as matters related to physics, finance, math, music, computer, education, etc. As per your request [[User:Boing! said Zebedee]], I will stick with this id and discard the other id.|2=After requesting input, the consensus is that [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Bomsori_Kim&oldid=890243824 this edit] was you editing in violation of your block. Because of this, I am declining your request at this time. The [[WP:OFFER|standard offer]] is open to you:

# Wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion.
# Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban.
# Don't create any extraordinary reasons to object to a return.

--[[User:Crazycomputers|Chris]] [[User talk:Crazycomputers|(talk)]] 23:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)}}

It sounds like you are claiming that you haven't edited since this account was blocked, though [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Bomsori_Kim&oldid=890243824 this edit] appears to be you editing while logged out, less than two months ago. Is this true? --[[User:Crazycomputers|Chris]] [[User talk:Crazycomputers|(talk)]] 22:46, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

[[User:Crazycomputers|To Chris]]: I edited this page much long ago using this account and the other account I accidentally created. This became the reason of blocking. I do not have any other accounts and have not made any edits since then. It seems that the more recent one you are referring to is not from me. [[User:Tseung kang 99|Tseung kang 99]] ([[User talk:Tseung kang 99#top|talk]]) 03:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|I have not edit that page. That IP is not mine as well. I already abides to Wiki rule for almost six months. What should I do then to unblock this account then?? Can you at least set the deadline for unblock of this account? | decline = It appears to me that several people have already invested significant effort in evaluating your contributions and determining the attribution of material you have contributed anonymously and under other identities. If you wish to return in six months to request the standard offer, you may do so. I do not recommend that you make additional unblock requests before then. '''[[User:UninvitedCompany|<span style="color:green">Uninvited</span>]][[User_talk:UninvitedCompany|Company]]''' 22:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC)}}
{{UTRS-unblock-user|27497|Nov 06, 2019 16:47:38|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 16:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I have been blocked since Dec 2018 and have waited for ~1 year for my account to be unblocked. Please review my unblock request with full consideration. I am well aware that I violated rules regarding the use of multiple accounts and addition of copyright violations issues. As noted to the arbitration committee earlier, these happened because I was new to the platform. I will abide to the rules of Wikipedia moving forward. | decline = <!-- stale block -->Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request.<!-- Template:decline stale--> [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 13:25, 27 November 2019 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed| I have been blocked since Dec 2018 and have waited for ~1 year for my account to be unblocked as suggested by arbitraion committee. I am well aware that I violated rules regarding the use of multiple accounts and addition of copyright violations issues. As noted to the arbitration committee earlier, these happened because I was new to the platform. I will abide to the rules of Wikipedia moving forward. Please review my unblock request with full consideration. I will abide to the rules of Wikipedia moving forward.[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] If you need more information from me, please specify in detail and I will supplement.|decline=Nothing in this or any of the other unblock requests indicates an understanding of copyright sufficient to prevent a recurrence of the past problems. And that's not even considering your creation of sockpuppet accounts after you had been blocked for sockpuppetry - you cannot claim that you thought that was OK. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 02:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)}}


{{unblock reviewed | 1=OK. [[User:Huon|Huon]] If you review my previous comments, I described and acknowledged my unintentional sockpuppet behavior and was told to wait for 6 mth from arbitration committee and now it has been ~1 year now. It all happened because I did not remember my previous account and was new to Wiki. Please suggest what I should do to get it unblocked. Arbitration committee says one thing and another member says different thing, and the criteria seem vague and unclear to me. It takes a few weeks to get my request to be reviewed and I keep have to submit my request and reviewed by different members with different criteria. Please suggest a clear guideline to get it unblocked.<small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tseung kang 99|Tseung kang 99]] ([[User talk:Tseung kang 99#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tseung kang 99|contribs]]) 20:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)</small> | decline = <!-- stale block -->Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request.<!-- Template:decline stale--> [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 14:10, 24 December 2019 (UTC)}}

I think it would help if you gave us some idea that you understand the policies in question ([[WP:SOCK]] and [[WP:COPYVIO]]). That's probably why it's taking so long for your unblock requests to be reviewed, and why you're having so much trouble getting unblocked. If you could summarize them in your own words, that would help to show that you understand them. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 22:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|If you review my previous comments, I described and acknowledged my unintentional sockpuppet behavior and was told to wait for 6 mth from Arbitration committee and now it has been more than 1 year now. It all happened because I did not remember my previous account and was new to Wiki. I keep requesting the unblock request but it gets procedural-declined because no one reviews my request. Please suggest what I should do to get it unblocked.
I asked for help on wikipedia-en-help chat page, and [[User:Eman235]] advised me summarize my issue. Following are the descriptions of the rules I broke:
I understand and admit that I violated [[WP:SOCK]] by creating another account because I was new to Wiki and forgot my id and created a new account although there was existing one. I understand and admit that I violated [[WP:COPYVIO]] by using photos used by another owner, which I should've avoided this and use photos which I own copyright.|decline=This doesn't address anything that has been raised on your talk page – in particular, you've ignored what I said to do in your next unblock request. Talk page access revoked to prevent further time-wasting. If you want to try again, summarize [[WP:SOCK]] and [[WP:COPYVIO]] in your own words via [[WP:UTRS]]. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 22:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)}}

<div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px">
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|left|45px|link=|alt=Stop hand]] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.'''
<span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">([{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=block&page=User:{{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} block log] • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=search&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} active blocks] • [{{fullurl:Special:GlobalBlockList|ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|contribs]]<span class="sysop-show"> • [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|deleted contribs]]</span> • [{{fullurl:Special:AbuseLog|wpSearchUser={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} abuse filter log] • [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=newusers&user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} creation log]<span class="sysop-show"> • [[Special:BlockIP/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|change block settings]] • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=unblock&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} unblock]</span><span class="checkuser-show"> • [{{fullurl:Special:CheckUser|user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&reason={{urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}]], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ([{{fullurl:Special:CheckUserLog|cuSearchType=target&cuSearch={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} log])</span>) </span>
{{clear}}
----
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the ''[[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|Unblock Ticket Request System]]''. If the block is a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#CheckUser blocks|CheckUser]] or [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Oversight blocks|Oversight]] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|unblock ticket request system]] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p></div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice -->

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I was new to Wiki and admit that it is my fault. This is why I accepted to wait 6 month to get it unblocked. Now, it is well over 1 year since the block. I cross-checked my description of the rules with another admin [[User:Eman235]] via wiki chat and [[User:Deepfriedokra]] on UTRS, and let me know if [[User:NinjaRobotPirate]] or other admin is happy about it. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]], I was Procedural declined twice already each taking +1mth get the reply; I really hope you can answer to this request without another procedural decline. * Regarding WP:SOCK/WP:COPYVIO Summary a. WP:SOCK: One should remain to only one account and not create multiple accounts to avoid detection, mislead other members in wiki, and violate community standards and policies. One should not use multiple accounts to make problematic edits, and when using same IP, it is recommended to declare such connections for different accounts. An editor may be allowed to use multiple accounts for valid reasons , but he or she should list all accounts with proper descriptions of its purpose. Editing while logged out is fine but must not actively use it to deceive the community. Others may register alternative account for legitaimate reasons too: security at public domain, privacy issue with controversial issue, doppelgänger accounts to prevent impersonation, clean start, username violation, compromised account, humorous alternative accounts, inaccessable due to technical issues, admin designated roles, or teaching. Editors should provide links between the accounts. Regarding meatpuppetry, for high-profile disputes, consensus should not be based upon vote counts ideally. Some may recruit new editors to influence decisions, but the concensus should be based on policy-related points made by editors. Arbitration committee may get involved for the purpose of dispute resolution. Sock puppets are usually detected by voluntary reportingand CheckUser tool from Wiki that checks IP addresses. The account will get blocked and tagged. b. WPL COPYVIO: Other than items listed for No rights reserved, CC BY-SA and GFDL, one should get permission for release of original content to Wiki and its downstream users from not only from Wiki but also from origianl copyright holder, and place correct attribution to it not entitled to royalties or compensation. It is best to contact the copyright holders to provide something like CC BY-SA and GFDL so that content may be used at Wiki. There is a template for request letter for confirmation at "Wikipedia:Example requests for permission" page. When you share your own text, you can licence to public for redistribution under CC BY-SA and GFDL. Most of media already has the copyright, so one needs to contact original holder for permission unless the media is explicitly available to public or licensed under CC BY-SA and GFDL. On same cases abiding to fair use guidelines, you may use it regardless of copyright claims. Also, if one may import media with a compatible license, but cites its sources and provides attribution credit to the original author. The content shared in Wikimedia, a non-profit organization, may apprear in digital encyclopedia or books, and people may donate media to Wikimedia Commons. If editors who repeatedly violate copyright rules will be blocked. | accept = I have unblocked you per your appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note you are subject to a one-account restriction. '''[[User talk:Maxim|<font face="Arial"><font color="#FF7133">Maxim</font><sub><small><font color="blue">(talk)</font></small></sub></font>]]''' 13:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)}}
== Tseung kang 99 unblocked ==

Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Tseung kang 99]] is unblocked subject to a one-account restriction. For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User talk:Maxim|<font face="Arial"><font color="#FF7133">Maxim</font><sub><small><font color="blue">(talk)</font></small></sub></font>]]''' 13:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Tseung kang 99 unblocked]]'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 13:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->

Latest revision as of 22:18, 18 March 2020

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tseung_kang_99&oldid=946231402"