Jump to content

Talk:United States Census Bureau: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 8: Line 8:
{{archive basics}}
{{archive basics}}
{{archives}}
{{archives}}

== No mention of Obama moving overseeing of bureau to White House in 2009? ==

That was a pretty major and very controversial move. All the more so now with the news that unemployment data from the bureau likely was falsified in 2012 before the presidential election. [[User:JayHubie|JayHubie]] ([[User talk:JayHubie|talk]]) 02:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
*{{ping|User:JayHubie}}, please provide [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] verifying the above statement.--[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 21:19, 7 December 2014 (UTC)


== Divisions of the United States ==
== Divisions of the United States ==

Revision as of 18:16, 24 March 2020

Divisions of the United States

While I understand that the United States Census Bureau is a credible source, I don't like the way that so many US Region articles are slanted towards the Census's definitions, including South, Southwest, West, and Midwest. Northeastern United States does a better job at it than the Census-biased articles (at least on its map), I think. The maps and definitions used should not be solely dependent on the Census. Changes should be made to reflect the wider regional definitions, in my opinion. Dustin (talk) 15:30, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Alumni

This could be a useful section, it was removed without discussion so it's been saved here:Bachcell (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a technological and methodological innovator, the U.S. Census Bureau has long been an incubator for talent[1].

References

  1. ^ "Notable Alumni". Census.gov. Retrieved 4 April 2015.

Question

Has anyone ever seen previous years census figures changed on the United States Census site? I just saw a 2013 figure changed when the 2014 came out. That looks fishy to me, as anyone have ever seen it before? Linda Rider (talk) 05:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United States Census Bureau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation

The information should be more precise and more direct. I would like to see more visual representation of how the process of census works. Santosde (talk) 04:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]