User talk:KaitoNkmra23

Kaito Nakamura, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kaito Nakamura! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Conjuring+3+Instagram.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Conjuring+3+Instagram.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Ghostbusters-3-2020.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Ghostbusters-3-2020.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Kaito Nakamura! You created a thread called Semi-protection to several articles. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

License tagging for File:It official logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:It official logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:31, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jumanji (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Helfrich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into It (franchise). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

"Untitled James Wan project" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled James Wan project. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled James Wan project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

The Haunting of Bly Manor

I've started a discussion at WT:TV regarding the above article, as to whether it's a second season or a completely separte series. -- /Alex/₂₁ 10:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Conjuring+3+Instagram.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Conjuring+3+Instagram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:The Haunting of Bly Manor.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:The Haunting of Bly Manor.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Format

There were several discussions about the "format" you mentioned, all of them resulted in review aggregators to be expressed/written in different ways. The sentence you mentioned was added in the first place, I think, by TropicAces and it was not a community decision or anything (in fact MOS:FILM suggests a very different one that is similiar to my edit). The sentence I wrote explains the Tomatometer better IMO, since it is described as "percentage of professional critic reviews that are positive for a given film or television show" by Rotten Tomatoes. Also, approval rating is opinion poll, which is not quite what Tomatometer is. ("An opinion poll, often simply referred to as a poll or a survey, is a human research survey of public opinion from a particular sample. Opinion polls are usually designed to represent the opinions of a population by conducting a series of questions and then extrapolating generalities in ratio or within confidence intervals.") −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C{i}Fji[n − 1]+Fexti[(n^−1)] 10:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

@Sebastian James: My question to you is then why have all, yes ALL, film articles I’ve come across mention ‘approval rating’? Should all film articles be changed to this? If it’s been used so much to this point then I feel like it should just be kept that way. And also, you mentioned yourself that MOS:FILM suggests a different one to your own edit, and the edit you made on The Invisible Man is one based on YOUR own opinion, not by the guidelines. Kaito Nakamura (talk) 09:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

First of all, thank you, you finally decided to check your talk page before editing. "ALL film articles you've come across" is not a valid reason, since TropicAces changed most of them as they wished. I'm going to copy paste what I wrote above: MOS:FILM suggests a very different one [from your edit] that is similiar to my edit (only difference is the addition of date: "As of February 2020,..."), and also "approval rating is opinion poll, which is not quite what Tomatometer is..." −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C{i}Fji[n − 1]+Fexti[(n^−1)] 12:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Malignant (film)

Hello, Kaito Nakamura. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Malignant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)