Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions
→Candidates Tournament 2020: 7 now |
do not remove my posts (five times) |
||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
* {{pagelinks|1=Candidates Tournament 2020}} |
* {{pagelinks|1=Candidates Tournament 2020}} |
||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Until 5 Apr after the tournament concludes. The last |
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Until 5 Apr after the tournament concludes. The last five edits are each IP reverts of one another, and the chaos must abate: [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Candidates_Tournament_2020&diff=947311660&oldid=947311563] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Candidates_Tournament_2020&diff=947311736&oldid=947311660] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Candidates_Tournament_2020&diff=947311868&oldid=947311736] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Candidates_Tournament_2020&diff=947314153&oldid=947311868] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Candidates_Tournament_2020&diff=947314261&oldid=947314153]. <span style="color: #8B0000">Caradhras</span>Aiguo (<small>[[User talk:CaradhrasAiguo|leave language]]</small>) 15:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
* Oppose. This user has reverted the sourced info five times and semi-protection will be the big advantage for him in the dispute where he is absolutely wrong. [[Special:Contributions/94.178.235.125|94.178.235.125]] ([[User talk:94.178.235.125|talk]]) 15:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== Current requests for reduction in protection level == |
== Current requests for reduction in protection level == |
Revision as of 16:02, 25 March 2020
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive socking by multiple socks from the same puppeteer as above, requesting semi for now. Gotitbro (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one user, and semi-protection works against the IPs. The user has been at it for days, and there is just one warning so far. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: Not sure what exactly you meant here, this is a case of blatant socking. All the IPs and blocked accounts you see in the page history are the same puppeteer (a very chronic one). This page is not even under semi and I am requesting that here. Same for the above two cases, its not simply a new single IP/user, there are multiple auto-confirmed accounts and IPs of the same puppeteer and the pages clearly need a higher level of protection. This one doesn't even have any PP. Please revisit these. Gotitbro (talk) 11:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: The page is currently Extended confirmed protection. it may be valuable if it has pending changes protection Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 06:28, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr.Mani Raj Paul: could you elaborate a bit please? Do you want the protection lowered, or pending changes protection put on top of the existing protection? Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – possible surname difference. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 07:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible page; Disruptive editing from IPs . —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brihaspati (talk) 10:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of cited content by IPs and new users. Nizil (talk) 11:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive socking from the same puppeteer through IPs and socks. Requesting temporary PP atleast for the time being. Gotitbro (talk) 11:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive and contentious editing by IP, complete unwillingness to discuss. Gotitbro (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As with other articles pertaining to Muhammad, this one seems to be heading for indef semi protection eventually. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Consistent WP:BLP violations and disruptive editing. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - continuous disruptive edits by IPs and new accounts with some repeatedly making the same edits despite being reverted (more on talk page). Mellk (talk) 15:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and block evasion by a sock puppet. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 15:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until 5 Apr after the tournament concludes. The last five edits are each IP reverts of one another, and the chaos must abate: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 15:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. This user has reverted the sourced info five times and semi-protection will be the big advantage for him in the dispute where he is absolutely wrong. 94.178.235.125 (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: sandbox was mistakenly used by main module. Please unprotect. — hike395 (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Hike395 Done --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because prevent damage to Teahouse. 2001:44C8:455C:91:C1B3:EC6C:4318:1D05 (talk) 04:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment:: it was literally just protected, and what does that even mean? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- The protection is only for a few hours and was done to stymie a persistent vandal. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined * Pppery * it has begun... 06:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Unsuppress file history: to enable exportation to commons/restoring image quality. The image is a public domain text logo originally wrongly tagged as fair use, therefore file history is errantly suppressed. 17jiangz1 (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This page currently has Extended confirmed protection. Make it as Semi-protected. Reason: The common page is Semi-protected. Givingbacktosociety (talk) 01:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @NJA:, the protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Why not apply indefinite semi-protection for this article like other some country specific articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.77.93.25 (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Because every article has to be judged on its own merits (or non-merits, in this case). Let's wait what the protecting admin has to say. Lectonar (talk) 11:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: Givingbacktosociety may be unaware as they're a newer account, but it is ECP due to Arbitration committee sanctions on the topic. See the notes here, N.J.A. | talk 11:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Because every article has to be judged on its own merits (or non-merits, in this case). Let's wait what the protecting admin has to say. Lectonar (talk) 11:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
In the lead section change (part of the Israel-Hamas war) to (amid the Israeli-Hamas war). Seahumidity (talk) 09:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done – "part of" is standard for infoboxes regarding conflicts etc. Favonian (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{pagelinks}} template and then the reason. It looks like this: Wikipedia:Example (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Example|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) your request here. ~~~~
Handled requests
A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.