Effective one-body formalism: Difference between revisions
Whispering (talk | contribs) m Whispering moved page User:Virtual Neutrino/Effective one body to Draft:Effective one body: Preferred location for AfC submissions |
removing advertisement-esque langauge |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|pages=211-252 |
|pages=211-252 |
||
|publisher=Springer |
|publisher=Springer |
||
}}</ref>. |
}}</ref>. The theory allows calculations to not only be made in particular limits limits, such as [[post-Newtonian]] theory in the early inspiral, when the objects are at large separation, or [[linearized gravity|black hole perturbation theory]], when the two objects differ greatly in mass. In addition, it leads to results faster than [[numerical relativity]]. Rather than being considered distinct from these other approaches to the two-body problem, the EOB formalism is a way to [[Padé approximant|resum]] information from other methods<ref>{{Citation |
||
|last=Bini |
|last=Bini |
||
|first=D. |
|first=D. |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|pages=25-77 |
|pages=25-77 |
||
|publisher=Springer |
|publisher=Springer |
||
}}</ref>. It does so by mapping the general two-body problem to that of a test-particle in an effective [[Metric tensor (general relativity)|metric]]. |
}}</ref>. It does so by mapping the general two-body problem to that of a test-particle in an effective [[Metric tensor (general relativity)|metric]]. The method was used in the data-analysis of [[gravitational-wave observatory|gravitational wave detectors]] such as [[LIGO]] and [[Virgo interferometer|Virgo]]<ref>{{Cite journal |collaboration=LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration |last=Abbott |first=B. P. |date=7 June 2016 |title=GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO |journal=[[Physical Review Letters]] |volume=93 |issue=12}}</ref>. |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
{{AFC submission|||ts=20200123183334|u=Virtual Neutrino|ns=2}} |
{{AFC submission|||ts=20200123183334|u=Virtual Neutrino|ns=2}} |
||
Revision as of 20:42, 28 March 2020
The effective one-body or EOB formalism, is an analytical approach to the gravitational two-body problem in general relativity. It was introduced by Alessandra Buonanno and Thibault Damour in 1999 [1]. It aims to describe all different phases of the two-body dynamics in a single analytical method [2]. The theory allows calculations to not only be made in particular limits limits, such as post-Newtonian theory in the early inspiral, when the objects are at large separation, or black hole perturbation theory, when the two objects differ greatly in mass. In addition, it leads to results faster than numerical relativity. Rather than being considered distinct from these other approaches to the two-body problem, the EOB formalism is a way to resum information from other methods[3]. It does so by mapping the general two-body problem to that of a test-particle in an effective metric. The method was used in the data-analysis of gravitational wave detectors such as LIGO and Virgo[4].
References
- ^ Buonnano, A.; Damour, T. (1999), "Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics", Phys. Rev. D, 59 (8)
- ^ Damour, T.; Nagar, A. (2011), "The Effective One-Body Description of the Two-Body Problem", in Blanchet, L.; Spallicci, A.; Whiting, B. (eds.), Mass and Motion in General Relativity, Springer, pp. 211–252
- ^ Bini, D.; Damour, T.; Geralico, A. (2017), "High-Order Post-Newtonian Contributions to Gravitational Self-force Effects in Black Hole Spacetimes", in Gosse, L.; Natalini, R. (eds.), Innovative Algorithms and Analysis, Springer, pp. 25–77
- ^ Abbott, B. P.; et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (7 June 2016). "GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO". Physical Review Letters. 93 (12).
This article, Effective one-body formalism, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |