Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Ulrich Stranz: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
patience needed
Reviewed
Line 23: Line 23:
::: You are right, and I am busy, and know little about the person. Patience please. - Look at [[Karlheinz Stockhausen|Stockhausen]] perhaps to understand how much classical contemporary music has to do with electronic music. [[Charles Wuorinen|The composer who recently died]] won the Pulitzer prize for a completely electronic piece of music. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 19:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
::: You are right, and I am busy, and know little about the person. Patience please. - Look at [[Karlheinz Stockhausen|Stockhausen]] perhaps to understand how much classical contemporary music has to do with electronic music. [[Charles Wuorinen|The composer who recently died]] won the Pulitzer prize for a completely electronic piece of music. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 19:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)


*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article new enough and long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no copyvio concerns raised by Earwig, and QPQ done. Hook is cited and interesting and complies with DYK policy. That does not require a hook to refer to a subject’s life, career, or accomplishments, or to “appeal to a broad international audience”. Ready to go, unless {{u|Gerda Arendt}} wishes to suggest an ALT. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 14:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 14:30, 10 April 2020

Ulrich Stranz

Created by LouisAlain (talk) and Gerda Arendt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 23:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC).

  • I would really suggest that a different hook be proposed here, as it basically says that a composer composed a work. It says nothing about his life, career, or accomplishments. In addition, the hook as written would only appeal to those interested in European classical music and not to a broad international audience, as it mentions niche topics such as a Munich performance or a soloist that most people have not heard of. I would suggest that a different hook be written about him, something that would make even someone not interested in classical music want to learn more about him. Perhaps the part that goes Stranz spent two years at the electronic studio in Utrecht could be a good starting point here? I'm really wondering what an electronic studio has to do with classical music.
As an additional comment, the part which goes Stranz died in Zürich shortly before his 58th birthday of cancer. He was buried at the Fluntern Cemetery. is unreferenced. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
You are right, and I am busy, and know little about the person. Patience please. - Look at Stockhausen perhaps to understand how much classical contemporary music has to do with electronic music. The composer who recently died won the Pulitzer prize for a completely electronic piece of music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Article new enough and long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no copyvio concerns raised by Earwig, and QPQ done. Hook is cited and interesting and complies with DYK policy. That does not require a hook to refer to a subject’s life, career, or accomplishments, or to “appeal to a broad international audience”. Ready to go, unless Gerda Arendt wishes to suggest an ALT. Moonraker (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)