Talk:Thami El Glaoui: Difference between revisions
P.S. |
m source ? |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
PS: "He is almost universally reviled in Morocco as a traitor" is not a POV, its a fact. "He is a traitor" is a POV but that's not what I said. |
PS: "He is almost universally reviled in Morocco as a traitor" is not a POV, its a fact. "He is a traitor" is a POV but that's not what I said. |
||
[[User:MisterCDE|MisterCDE]] 04:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:MisterCDE|MisterCDE]] 04:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
You can mention an opinion if you state whose opinion it is. |
|||
"universally reviled as a ‘collabo’ (collaborationist with the French Protectorate)" The source for his 'fact' ? [[User:S710|S710]] 13:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:16, 18 December 2006
In spite of S710's stating he is "removing some POV" his major edit is to insert some argument from a supposed historian Victor A. Vyssotsky. Said person is not an historian, but a mathematician who has done some book reviewing on Amazon.com, and what S710 has inserted is some material from one of his reviews of a book on Morocco by C. R. Pennell. As Pennell's book was published prior to Abdessadek El Glaoui's biography of his father, which contains some essential material, it is hardly definitive ... in any case, it is most definitely "POV" as is most history. Hence I have reverted S710's edits. MisterCDE 04:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
PS: "He is almost universally reviled in Morocco as a traitor" is not a POV, its a fact. "He is a traitor" is a POV but that's not what I said. MisterCDE 04:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
You can mention an opinion if you state whose opinion it is. "universally reviled as a ‘collabo’ (collaborationist with the French Protectorate)" The source for his 'fact' ? S710 13:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)