Szpiro's conjecture: Difference between revisions
→Original statement: section name change to original statement, since there are two here Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
m Reflist |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{ |
{{Reflist}} |
||
{{more footnotes|date=January 2016}} |
|||
* {{citation |first=S. |last=Lang |authorlink=Serge Lang |title=Survey of Diophantine geometry |publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] |location=Berlin |year=1997 |isbn=3-540-61223-8 | zbl=0869.11051 | page=51 }} |
* {{citation |first=S. |last=Lang |authorlink=Serge Lang |title=Survey of Diophantine geometry |publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] |location=Berlin |year=1997 |isbn=3-540-61223-8 | zbl=0869.11051 | page=51 }} |
||
* {{citation |first=L. |last=Szpiro |title=Seminaire sur les pinceaux des courbes de genre au moins deux |journal=Astérisque |volume=86 |issue=3 |year=1981 | zbl=0463.00009 | pages=44–78 }} |
* {{citation |first=L. |last=Szpiro |title=Seminaire sur les pinceaux des courbes de genre au moins deux |journal=Astérisque |volume=86 |issue=3 |year=1981 | zbl=0463.00009 | pages=44–78 }} |
Revision as of 16:39, 26 April 2020
Field | Number theory |
---|---|
Conjectured by | Lucien Szpiro |
Conjectured in | 1981 |
Equivalent to | abc conjecture |
Consequences |
In number theory, Szpiro's conjecture relates the conductor and the discriminant of an elliptic curve. In a slightly modified form, it is equivalent to the well-known abc conjecture. It is named for Lucien Szpiro who formulated it in the 1980s.
Original statement
The conjecture states that: given ε > 0, there exists a constant C(ε) such that for any elliptic curve E defined over Q with minimal discriminant Δ and conductor f, we have
Modified Szpiro conjecture
The modified Szpiro conjecture states that: given ε > 0, there exists a constant C(ε) such that for any elliptic curve E defined over Q with invariants c4, c6 and conductor f (using notation from Tate's algorithm), we have
Claimed proofs
In August 2012, Shinichi Mochizuki claimed a proof of Szpiro's conjecture by developing a new theory called inter-universal Teichmüller theory (IUTT).[1] However, the papers have not been accepted by the mathematical community as providing a proof of the conjecture,[2][3][4] with Peter Scholze and Jakob Stix concluding in March 2018 that the gap was "so severe that … small modifications will not rescue the proof strategy".[5][6][7]
References
- ^ Ball, Peter (10 September 2012). "Proof claimed for deep connection between primes". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.11378. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ^ Revell, Timothy (September 7, 2017). "Baffling ABC maths proof now has impenetrable 300-page 'summary'". New Scientist.
- ^ Conrad, Brian (December 15, 2015). "Notes on the Oxford IUT workshop by Brian Conrad". Retrieved March 18, 2018.
- ^ Castelvecchi, Davide (8 October 2015). "The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and the impenetrable proof". Nature. 526 (7572): 178–181. Bibcode:2015Natur.526..178C. doi:10.1038/526178a. PMID 26450038.
- ^ Scholze, Peter; Stix, Jakob. "Why abc is still a conjecture" (PDF). Retrieved September 23, 2018. (updated version of their May report)
- ^ Klarreich, Erica (September 20, 2018). "Titans of Mathematics Clash Over Epic Proof of ABC Conjecture". Quanta Magazine.
- ^ "March 2018 Discussions on IUTeich". Retrieved October 2, 2018. Web-page by Mochizuki describing discussions and linking consequent publications and supplementary material
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (January 2016) |
- Lang, S. (1997), Survey of Diophantine geometry, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, p. 51, ISBN 3-540-61223-8, Zbl 0869.11051
- Szpiro, L. (1981), "Seminaire sur les pinceaux des courbes de genre au moins deux", Astérisque, 86 (3): 44–78, Zbl 0463.00009
- Szpiro, L. (1987), "Présentation de la théorie d'Arakelov", Contemp. Math., 67: 279–293, doi:10.1090/conm/067/902599, Zbl 0634.14012