User talk:Adamstom.97/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Infinity War/Endgame production work

Hey Adam! Hope all is well! I saw you're starting some work on the production article in your sandbox. Let me know when you're finished with what you want to do. I'd be happy to then go through and make a pass/copy-edit to it before its copied back over to the live article. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Will do. My plan at the moment is to get through everything I want to do by the end of the weekend, but if that doesn't happen then I may not be in a rush. So far I've been adding quite a bit of good stuff. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Sounds good, and yeah, no rush on my end either to look it over! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:58, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Patrolling of articles

Hello! Colleague, could you please to patrol this and this articles? Thank you. — Green Zero обг 01:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morbius (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Trek Discovery title card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Trek Discovery title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

star trek

I understand your comment but i think it is very relevant for a parent to know a star trek series is rated TV-MA. If you look up the movie Showgirls, you will see that its NC-17 rating is mentioned numerous times. When something is unusual I think it is reasonable for Wiki to include it because it is important information. If you wish to also state this in the main section that is fine with me. I think if you open this up for conversation, many people would see my POV. However, I will leave it as is. You change it (or include somewhere else) if you agree with me. Thanks Drycroft4 (talk) 22:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

You are right that it is reasonable to include if it is unusual, but it is not up to us to decide what is unusual and what is not. We need commentary from reliable third party sources discussing the rating and why it is unusual if we want to include that information in the article. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Once Upon a Deadpool

Hello, Adamstom.97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Once Upon a Deadpool".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

About DiscussingFilm

Hi, Tom. Given your edit in Draft:Untitled Spider-Man: Far From Home sequel, do you consider DiscussingFilm a reliable source? If so, why? I'm having a hard time defining if relatively new websites like this are reliable or not. I've also asked this at WT:FILM and WP:RSN. El Millo (talk) 01:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

It is relatively new, but it has editorial oversight and has proven reliable for scoops particularly related to filming and cinematographers. I definitely think its reliable, but like any of these sites we just have to keep an eye out to make sure what they are saying seems right. If they started reporting on a bunch of stuff that is obviously made up like what some other sites do (We Got This Covered, for example) then maybe we would have to reconsider. But yeah, at the moment I have been considering it to be reliable. - adamstom97 (talk) 01:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. El Millo (talk) 01:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)