User talk:Caltraser55: Difference between revisions

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Caltraser55, good luck, and have fun. — Newslinger talk 07:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Newslinger. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jordan Belfort, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 07:56, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Based on your editing style, addition of copyrighted images to articles, articles edited, etc. it is obvious that you are abusing multiple accounts to avoid scrutiny. I've blocked this account indefinitely. Please make sure that you abide by the rules of Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caltraser55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't have multiple accounts, and my edits are always there to help, so I've been unfairly blocked for pretty much no reason. So this is a bit like the whole burning witches thing, anyone can accuse anyone and have absolutely no evidence for it, great. I assume he thinks I'm a sock puppet because I uploaded an image which had previously been deleted, though I assume is a mistake because under Australian copyright laws the image is free to use, perhaps he has had a run in with the prior person who uploaded the image, in which case my reuploading it is entirely coincidental. Caltraser55 (talk) 01:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A simple denial is not sufficient in sockpuppetry cases, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so. You will need to specifically address why we think you are a sockpuppet if you are not(in this case, the reasons Magog the Ogre gives). 331dot (talk) 08:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I only have the one Wikipedia account, two I didn't know you can be blocked for editing articles??

FYI, your request was reviewed and declined. If you want to make another request, you can, but I suggest you respond to the issues I brought up. It was fairly obvious based on these characteristics. Not only did you upload the same image, you have the same interests, edit summary style, userpage style, and disingenuous copyright tags on Commons. The circumstantial evidence was strong enough to block your account even without checkuser evidence. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked your account based on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rogerduckling24. The circumstantial evidence was convincing but I guess I got it wrong. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, these things do tend to happen but sometimes it is just coincidental. I did see when I uploaded the image that a previous one had been deleted but couldn't find any reasoning for it so assumed it must have been a mistake by a bot or something? My interests tend to focus on Australia as a whole, across the spectrum from culture to politics, but I have particular interests in Queensland and Brisbane. All the best--Caltraser55 (talk) 00:36, 5 January 2020 (UTC

Gold Coast, Queensland

The revisions you made to the lede seem somewhat inaccurate. Firstly this article isn't about City of Gold Coast (or we wouldn't have two articles) so you can't say that it is officially known as that. It's the same issue as Brisbane vs City of Brisbane and Sunshine Coast vs Sunshine Coast Region etc, where the prevailing consensus is that there is a general meaning of the place name as a different geographic area than just that of the local government area bearing the same name. In past discussions on the Talk page what most people appear to understand as "the Gold Coast" seems to be "the bit I've gone to on my holidays" which appears to mean the coastal strip that extends from The Spit south. The ABS treats it as a a trans-border urban area for statistical purposes, so you have to be more careful with claims about being the Nth biggest place. The local government area is 2nd most populous in Queensland (true) but this article isn't about the local government area. The claim of being the 6th most populous city in Australia from memory depends on the inclusion of Tweed Valley (which ABS includes and I think ABS excludes some of the hinterland in the local government area) but this definition of "Gold Coast" is inconsistent with in the Wikipedia definition of the "Gold Coast" as is "in Qld", which I think is why the previous lede makes explicit mention of it. As is generally the case, complexities are best explained in the article body in full, and not abbreviated into an inaccurate shorthand version in the lede or as a field of the infobox. As a personal opinion, I think it's a bit strong to say it is "often" called G.C., I don't think it has that much traction in everyday usage. A quick trawl of the Brisbane Times doesn't turn it up as a common term (I used Brisbane Times as Gold Coast Bulletin is behind a paywall). "Sometimes" might be better. Kerry (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kerry, I'm not sure exactly what you mean here? The Gold Coast is a city, I'm aware the city council includes a regional area of the hinterland but I'm not sure why that matters? The Brisbane city council covers Moreton Bay and the islands which is a regional area. And Tweed Heads might be part of the regional conurbation, but it also isn't in Queensland, and therefore not part of Gold Coast city.--Caltraser55 (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 11:48, 1 May 2020 edit Kerry Raymond (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers 286,026 edits →Gold Coast, Queensland: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:33, 1 May 2020 edit undo Caltraser55 (talk \| contribs) 338 edits →Gold Coast, Queensland Next edit →
Line 69:		Line 69:

	The revisions you made to the lede seem somewhat inaccurate. Firstly this article isn't about [[City of Gold Coast]] (or we wouldn't have two articles) so you can't say that it is officially known as that. It's the same issue as [[Brisbane]] vs [[City of Brisbane]] and [[Sunshine Coast]] vs [[Sunshine Coast Region]] etc, where the prevailing consensus is that there is a general meaning of the place name as a different geographic area than just that of the local government area bearing the same name. In past discussions on the Talk page what most people appear to understand as "the Gold Coast" seems to be "the bit I've gone to on my holidays" which appears to mean the coastal strip that extends from The Spit south. The ABS treats it as a a trans-border urban area for statistical purposes, so you have to be more careful with claims about being the Nth biggest place. The local government area is 2nd most populous in Queensland (true) but this article isn't about the local government area. The claim of being the 6th most populous city in Australia from memory depends on the inclusion of Tweed Valley (which ABS includes and I think ABS excludes some of the hinterland in the local government area) but this definition of "Gold Coast" is inconsistent with in the Wikipedia definition of the "Gold Coast" as is "in Qld", which I think is why the previous lede makes explicit mention of it. As is generally the case, complexities are best explained in the article body in full, and not abbreviated into an inaccurate shorthand version in the lede or as a field of the infobox. As a personal opinion, I think it's a bit strong to say it is "often" called G.C., I don't think it has that much traction in everyday usage. A quick trawl of the Brisbane Times doesn't turn it up as a common term (I used Brisbane Times as Gold Coast Bulletin is behind a paywall). "Sometimes" might be better. [[User:Kerry Raymond\|Kerry]] ([[User talk:Kerry Raymond\|talk]]) 11:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)		The revisions you made to the lede seem somewhat inaccurate. Firstly this article isn't about [[City of Gold Coast]] (or we wouldn't have two articles) so you can't say that it is officially known as that. It's the same issue as [[Brisbane]] vs [[City of Brisbane]] and [[Sunshine Coast]] vs [[Sunshine Coast Region]] etc, where the prevailing consensus is that there is a general meaning of the place name as a different geographic area than just that of the local government area bearing the same name. In past discussions on the Talk page what most people appear to understand as "the Gold Coast" seems to be "the bit I've gone to on my holidays" which appears to mean the coastal strip that extends from The Spit south. The ABS treats it as a a trans-border urban area for statistical purposes, so you have to be more careful with claims about being the Nth biggest place. The local government area is 2nd most populous in Queensland (true) but this article isn't about the local government area. The claim of being the 6th most populous city in Australia from memory depends on the inclusion of Tweed Valley (which ABS includes and I think ABS excludes some of the hinterland in the local government area) but this definition of "Gold Coast" is inconsistent with in the Wikipedia definition of the "Gold Coast" as is "in Qld", which I think is why the previous lede makes explicit mention of it. As is generally the case, complexities are best explained in the article body in full, and not abbreviated into an inaccurate shorthand version in the lede or as a field of the infobox. As a personal opinion, I think it's a bit strong to say it is "often" called G.C., I don't think it has that much traction in everyday usage. A quick trawl of the Brisbane Times doesn't turn it up as a common term (I used Brisbane Times as Gold Coast Bulletin is behind a paywall). "Sometimes" might be better. [[User:Kerry Raymond\|Kerry]] ([[User talk:Kerry Raymond\|talk]]) 11:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

			:Hi Kerry, I'm not sure exactly what you mean here? The Gold Coast is a city, I'm aware the city council includes a regional area of the hinterland but I'm not sure why that matters? The Brisbane city council covers Moreton Bay and the islands which is a regional area. And Tweed Heads might be part of the regional conurbation, but it also isn't in Queensland, and therefore not part of Gold Coast city.--[[User:Caltraser55\|Caltraser55]] ([[User talk:Caltraser55#top\|talk]]) 12:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)