User talk:Chompy Ace/Archives/2020

Thanks for the ip block!

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:B004:12BB:C45B:2E71:EFB5:30E2 (talk) 21:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Problem?

Hi Carl, thank you for your message. However, it’s unclear as to how my edit was unconsrtuctive, and I was hoping you could explain so I can avoid similar mistakes in the future. 67.142.203.142 (talk) 02:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Per Bluejay14's revert that's clear. There is no evidence of the user "Tim Hardcastle", which is not registered. Carl Tristan Orense 02:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Could you please explain how this was vandalism?

Yes, that IP range's user has no clue what's going on, is engaging in kinda fringe (or at least POV) original research, and is bordering on edit warring. But I'm not seeing where anyone has explained things to them, and when they tried to ask for a reason, you reverted it and gave them a final warning?

Is there a related account or IP range that I'm missing? Ian.thomson (talk) 02:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

I think this post is placed on the top without the section, it is vandalism. Carl Tristan Orense 02:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

See "Incorrect wiki markup and style". Ian.thomson (talk) 02:59, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Carl Tristan Orense 03:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Wowowin

Stop updating the episode count 1 week in advance. You are obviously not from the future to be doing that.TheHotwiki (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

You are now a Pending Changes Reviewer!

Hi Carl Tristan Orense! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes and I happened to notice that you don't have the pending changes reviewer user rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling and that you consistently view and undo vandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that the pending changes reviewer rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of the tool. Instead of having you formally request the pending changes reviewer right at WP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave it to you. This user right allows you to review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under pending changes protection and either accept the edits to make them viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them.

Keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:

• A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges.
• A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
• Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
• You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
• Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear vandalism, blatant neutral point of view issues, copyright violations, or BLP violations.

Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, a summary of pending changes protection, the pending changes user right, and how it applies.
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy section on pending changes protection and its appropriate application and use by administrators.

I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page, and I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of H:LOGIN

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, H:LOGIN, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KylieTastic (talk) 11:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)