Jump to content

N-body simulation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Fixing the location of periods / full stops
m Converted image sizes in pixels to scaling values, as prescribed by WP:IMGSIZE, add Template:Use dmy dates | Alter: template type. Add: bibcode, doi, pages, issue, volume, journal, year. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes. | You can use this tool yourself. Report bugs here. | via #UCB_Gadget
Line 1: Line 1:
{{About|a topic in physics|the automobile platform|GM N platform}}
{{About|a topic in physics|the automobile platform|GM N platform}}
{{Hatnote|For engineering problems and simulations involving many components, see [[Multibody system]] and [[Multibody simulation]].}}
{{Hatnote|For engineering problems and simulations involving many components, see [[Multibody system]] and [[Multibody simulation]].}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''N''-body simulation}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''N''-body simulation}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}}
[[File:Galaxy cluster sim.png|thumb|An ''N''-body simulation of the cosmological formation of a cluster of galaxies in an expanding universe.|300px]]

In [[physics]] and [[astronomy]], an '''''N''-body simulation''' is a simulation of a [[dynamical system]] of particles, usually under the influence of physical forces, such as [[gravity]] (see [[n-body problem|''n''-body problem]]). ''N''-body simulations are widely used tools in [[astrophysics]], from investigating the dynamics of few-body systems like the [[Earth]]-[[Moon]]-[[Sun]] system to understanding the evolution of the [[large-scale structure of the universe]].<ref name=Trenti>{{cite web| first = Michele | last = Trenti | first2 = Piet | last2 = Hut|title=N-body simulations (gravitational)|url=http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/N-body_simulations|publisher=Scholarpedia|accessdate=25 March 2014}}</ref> In [[physical cosmology]], ''N''-body simulations are used to study processes of non-linear [[structure formation]] such as [[galaxy filament]]s and [[galaxy halo]]s from the influence of [[dark matter]]. Direct ''N''-body simulations are used to study the dynamical evolution of [[star cluster]]s.
[[File:Galaxy cluster sim.png|thumb|An ''N''-body simulation of the cosmological formation of a cluster of galaxies in an expanding universe.|upright=1.36]]
In [[physics]] and [[astronomy]], an '''''N''-body simulation''' is a simulation of a [[dynamical system]] of particles, usually under the influence of physical forces, such as [[gravity]] (see [[n-body problem|''n''-body problem]]). ''N''-body simulations are widely used tools in [[astrophysics]], from investigating the dynamics of few-body systems like the [[Earth]]-[[Moon]]-[[Sun]] system to understanding the evolution of the [[large-scale structure of the universe]].<ref name=Trenti>{{cite journal| first = Michele | last = Trenti | first2 = Piet | last2 = Hut|title=N-body simulations (gravitational)| year = 2008 |url=http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/N-body_simulations|journal=Scholarpedia| volume = 3 | issue = 5 | pages = 3930 | doi = 10.4249/scholarpedia.3930 | bibcode = 2008SchpJ...3.3930T |accessdate=25 March 2014}}</ref> In [[physical cosmology]], ''N''-body simulations are used to study processes of non-linear [[structure formation]] such as [[galaxy filament]]s and [[galaxy halo]]s from the influence of [[dark matter]]. Direct ''N''-body simulations are used to study the dynamical evolution of [[star cluster]]s.


==Nature of the particles==
==Nature of the particles==
Line 68: Line 70:
== Computational complexity ==
== Computational complexity ==


Reif et al.<ref>{{cite journal | citeseerx = 10.1.1.38.6242 | title = The Complexity of N-body Simulation }}</ref> prove that if the ''n''-body reachability problem is defined as follows – given ''n'' bodies satisfying a fixed electrostatic potential law, determining if a body reaches a destination ball in a given time bound where we require a poly(''n'') bits of accuracy and the target time is poly(''n'') is in [[PSPACE]].
Reif et al.<ref>{{cite journal | citeseerx = 10.1.1.38.6242 | title = The Complexity of N-body Simulation | year = 1993 | pages = 162–176 }}</ref> prove that if the ''n''-body reachability problem is defined as follows – given ''n'' bodies satisfying a fixed electrostatic potential law, determining if a body reaches a destination ball in a given time bound where we require a poly(''n'') bits of accuracy and the target time is poly(''n'') is in [[PSPACE]].


On the other hand, if the question is whether the body ''eventually'' reaches the destination ball, the problem is PSPACE-hard. These bounds are based on similar complexity bounds obtained for [[Ray tracing (graphics)|ray tracing]].
On the other hand, if the question is whether the body ''eventually'' reaches the destination ball, the problem is PSPACE-hard. These bounds are based on similar complexity bounds obtained for [[Ray tracing (graphics)|ray tracing]].

Revision as of 10:23, 5 May 2020

An N-body simulation of the cosmological formation of a cluster of galaxies in an expanding universe.

In physics and astronomy, an N-body simulation is a simulation of a dynamical system of particles, usually under the influence of physical forces, such as gravity (see n-body problem). N-body simulations are widely used tools in astrophysics, from investigating the dynamics of few-body systems like the Earth-Moon-Sun system to understanding the evolution of the large-scale structure of the universe.[1] In physical cosmology, N-body simulations are used to study processes of non-linear structure formation such as galaxy filaments and galaxy halos from the influence of dark matter. Direct N-body simulations are used to study the dynamical evolution of star clusters.

Nature of the particles

The 'particles' treated by the simulation may or may not correspond to physical objects which are particulate in nature. For example, an N-body simulation of a star cluster might have a particle per star, so each particle has some physical significance. On the other hand, a simulation of a gas cloud cannot afford to have a particle for each atom or molecule of gas as this would require on the order of 1023 particles for each mole of material (see Avogadro constant), so a single 'particle' would represent some much larger quantity of gas (often implemented using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics). This quantity need not have any physical significance, but must be chosen as a compromise between accuracy and manageable computer requirements.

Direct gravitational N-body simulations

N-body simulation of 400 objects with parameters close to those of Solar System planets.

In direct gravitational N-body simulations, the equations of motion of a system of N particles under the influence of their mutual gravitational forces are integrated numerically without any simplifying approximations. These calculations are used in situations where interactions between individual objects, such as stars or planets, are important to the evolution of the system.

The first direct N-body simulations were carried out by Erik Holmberg at the Lund Observatory in 1941, determining the forces between stars in encountering galaxies via the mathematical equivalence between light propagation and gravitational interaction: putting light bulbs at the positions of the stars and measuring the directional light fluxes at the positions of the stars by a photo cell, the equations of motion can be integrated with effort.[2] The first purely calculational simulations were then done by Sebastian von Hoerner at the Astronomisches Rechen-Institut in Heidelberg, Germany. Sverre Aarseth at the University of Cambridge (UK) has dedicated his entire scientific life to the development of a series of highly efficient N-body codes for astrophysical applications which use adaptive (hierarchical) time steps, an Ahmad-Cohen neighbour scheme and regularization of close encounters. Regularization is a mathematical trick to remove the singularity in the Newtonian law of gravitation for two particles which approach each other arbitrarily close. Sverre Aarseth's codes are used to study the dynamics of star clusters, planetary systems and galactic nuclei.[citation needed]

General relativity simulations

Many simulations are large enough that the effects of general relativity in establishing a Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker cosmology are significant. This is incorporated in the simulation as an evolving measure of distance (or scale factor) in a comoving coordinate system, which causes the particles to slow in comoving coordinates (as well as due to the redshifting of their physical energy). However, the contributions of general relativity and the finite speed of gravity can otherwise be ignored, as typical dynamical timescales are long compared to the light crossing time for the simulation, and the space-time curvature induced by the particles and the particle velocities are small. The boundary conditions of these cosmological simulations are usually periodic (or toroidal), so that one edge of the simulation volume matches up with the opposite edge.

Calculation optimizations

N-body simulations are simple in principle, because they involve merely integrating the 6N ordinary differential equations defining the particle motions in Newtonian gravity. In practice, the number N of particles involved is usually very large (typical simulations include many millions, the Millennium simulation included ten billion) and the number of particle-particle interactions needing to be computed increases on the order of N2, and so direct integration of the differential equations can be prohibitively computationally expensive. Therefore, a number of refinements are commonly used.

Numerical integration is usually performed over small timesteps using a method such as leapfrog integration. However all numerical integration leads to errors. Smaller steps give lower errors but run more slowly. Leapfrog integration is roughly 2nd order on the timestep, other integrators such as Runge–Kutta methods can have 4th order accuracy or much higher.

One of the simplest refinements is that each particle carries with it its own timestep variable, so that particles with widely different dynamical times don't all have to be evolved forward at the rate of that with the shortest time.

There are two basic approximation schemes to decrease the computational time for such simulations. These can reduce the computational complexity to O(N log N) or better, at the loss of accuracy.

Tree methods

In tree methods, such as a Barnes–Hut simulation, an octree is usually used to divide the volume into cubic cells and only interactions between particles from nearby cells need to be treated individually; particles in distant cells can be treated collectively as a single large particle centered at the distant cell's center of mass (or as a low-order multipole expansion). This can dramatically reduce the number of particle pair interactions that must be computed. To prevent the simulation from becoming swamped by computing particle-particle interactions, the cells must be refined to smaller cells in denser parts of the simulation which contain many particles per cell. For simulations where particles are not evenly distributed, the well-separated pair decomposition methods of Callahan and Kosaraju yield optimal O(n log n) time per iteration with fixed dimension.

Particle mesh method

Another possibility is the particle mesh method in which space is discretised on a mesh and, for the purposes of computing the gravitational potential, particles are assumed to be divided between the nearby vertices of the mesh. Finding the potential energy Φ is easy, because the Poisson equation

where G is Newton's constant and is the density (number of particles at the mesh points), is trivial to solve by using the fast Fourier transform to go to the frequency domain where the Poisson equation has the simple form

where is the comoving wavenumber and the hats denote Fourier transforms. The gravitational field can now be found by multiplying by and computing the inverse Fourier transform (or computing the inverse transform and then using some other method). Since this method is limited by the mesh size, in practice a smaller mesh or some other technique (such as combining with a tree or simple particle-particle algorithm) is used to compute the small-scale forces. Sometimes an adaptive mesh is used, in which the mesh cells are much smaller in the denser regions of the simulation.

Special-case optimizations

Several different gravitational perturbation algorithms are used to get fairly accurate estimates of the path of objects in the solar system.

People often decide to put a satellite in a frozen orbit. The path of a satellite closely orbiting the Earth can be accurately modeled starting from the 2-body elliptical orbit around the center of the Earth, and adding small corrections due to the oblateness of the Earth, gravitational attraction of the Sun and Moon, atmospheric drag, etc. It is possible to find a frozen orbit without calculating the actual path of the satellite.

The path of a small planet, comet, or long-range spacecraft can often be accurately modeled starting from the 2-body elliptical orbit around the sun, and adding small corrections from the gravitational attraction of the larger planets in their known orbits.

Some characteristics of the long-term paths of a system of particles can be calculated directly. The actual path of any particular particle does not need to be calculated as an intermediate step. Such characteristics include Lyapunov stability, Lyapunov time, various measurements from ergodic theory, etc.

Two-particle systems

Although there are millions or billions of particles in typical simulations, they typically correspond to a real particle with a very large mass, typically 109 solar masses. This can introduce problems with short-range interactions between the particles such as the formation of two-particle binary systems. As the particles are meant to represent large numbers of dark matter particles or groups of stars, these binaries are unphysical. To prevent this, a softened Newtonian force law is used, which does not diverge as the inverse-square radius at short distances. Most simulations implement this quite naturally by running the simulations on cells of finite size. It is important to implement the discretization procedure in such a way that particles always exert a vanishing force on themselves.

Incorporating baryons, leptons and photons into simulations

Many simulations simulate only cold dark matter, and thus include only the gravitational force. Incorporating baryons, leptons and photons into the simulations dramatically increases their complexity and often radical simplifications of the underlying physics must be made. However, this is an extremely important area and many modern simulations are now trying to understand processes that occur during galaxy formation which could account for galaxy bias.

Computational complexity

Reif et al.[3] prove that if the n-body reachability problem is defined as follows – given n bodies satisfying a fixed electrostatic potential law, determining if a body reaches a destination ball in a given time bound where we require a poly(n) bits of accuracy and the target time is poly(n) is in PSPACE.

On the other hand, if the question is whether the body eventually reaches the destination ball, the problem is PSPACE-hard. These bounds are based on similar complexity bounds obtained for ray tracing.

See also

References

  1. ^ Trenti, Michele; Hut, Piet (2008). "N-body simulations (gravitational)". Scholarpedia. 3 (5): 3930. Bibcode:2008SchpJ...3.3930T. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.3930. Retrieved 25 March 2014.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  2. ^ Holmberg, Erik (1941). "On the Clustering Tendencies among the Nebulae. II. a Study of Encounters Between Laboratory Models of Stellar Systems by a New Integration Procedure". The Astrophysical Journal. 94 (3): 385–395. Bibcode:1941ApJ....94..385H. doi:10.1086/144344.
  3. ^ "The Complexity of N-body Simulation". 1993: 162–176. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.38.6242. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

Further reading