Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summer of Mesa

Summer of Mesa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Summer of Mesa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about YouTube-only film, not making or reliably sourcing any strong claim to passing WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists -- films need to show some evidence of their significance, such as noteworthy film awards and/or non-trivial attention from film critics. But this cites no media coverage at all, and even a Google search turns up no viable sources either: it only turns up databases and primary sources, not notability-supporting media. According to this article the film is still a few weeks away from its release, so no prejudice against recreation at a later date if its sourceability improves -- but if sources don't already exist yet, then a Wikipedia article isn't allowed to exist yet either. Bearcat (talk) 20:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Non notable YouTube film. Mccapra (talk) 20:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Flori4nKT A L K 20:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

• Put delete on hold for 72 hours. The article was created on 19:05, 9 May 2020‎‎ -- one hour before this request for deletion was initiated. It's an upcoming film. There have been and are articles about upcoming films that have not received the kick in the ass that this one has. The editor who created the article is a noob and obviously isn't 100% familiar with all the requirements for creating Wikipedia articles. He/she should be given 72 hours to add reliable sources. If they have not been added after the 72 hours have passed, then, yes, delete it. (It's distasteful how steam hammers are so zealously brought down on articles when there's nothing offensive about them to warrant such a response. No wonder so many people won't contribute to Wikipedia, and so many other say F-it and leave.) Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 09:52, 10 May 2020 (UTC)