User talk:Mr.Sarcastic

Hello, Mr.Sarcastic, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Mr.Sarcastic, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mr.Sarcastic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Saurashtra people. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mr.Sarcastic, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Saurashtra people have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StudiesWorld (talk) 13:12, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your review! I will rephrase those content which was removed by you shortly. In almost all cases, i have rephrased the content which i have been adding with proper citations but there are very least cases like the one you just encountered. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 14:13, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Marathi people into Thanjavur Marathi people. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: The names have been copied from the older version of this page Thanjavur Marathi people which i have recently edited. I haven't copied anything outside of this page Thanjavur Marathi people. You can check it here. You have just misunderstood as some of the names were also present in this page also List of Marathi people which i was not aware of at that time. Well regarding attributions, i will keep that in mind in my future edits and also Thank you for explaining about the attributions again.(Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 15:45, 20 January 2020 (UTC))

Stop leaving messages on my talk page

You are insisting on retaining *unsourced*, patently false information in Madras bashai, and yet presume to leave a message on my talk page claiming that *I* am violating WP:Verifiability? Hölderlin2019 (talk) 18:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Before deleting anything from a page you have to talk through in their talk page which you clearly did not do in this case. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 19:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Would you mind linking me to the policy that says that? I’ve never heard of that particular policy, and I’m rather sure that most Wikipedia editors haven’t, since it doesn’t exist. You should now revert your own revert, since your reinstatement of challenged unsourced material itself violates WP:Verifiability.

While you’re at it, I’d appreciate an explanation of how my edit violated WP:NPOV or WP:Verifiability? Have you even read the latter of the two? My edits are mandated by it, whereas yours flatly contravene it. Hölderlin2019 (talk) 19:03, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

I notice you’ve recently reverted unsourced material without discussing it on the talk page here. Would you further care to explain why you don’t follow your own rules? Hölderlin2019 (talk) 09:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

@Hölderlin2019: Well, I have sourced the content which you previously stated "crap" "non-sense" which is not a good way to address someones content. You should learn some manners and use proper sentences in narrations which you clearly lack your edit history says a lot about yourself. And also, if what i did is wrong there are several editors over here who might have gone through that page Madras bashai and could have reverted my edit but no one seems to have did that. Further You are hiding my messages and warnings from your talk page by blanking the whole warning which is also not a good practice and clearly states your about transparency . I think your whole agenda here is something else and you are harassing my edits and pushing your point of view of in words like "crap" "non-sense" "nonsense from incompetent editor" instead of explaining your point by adding sources and if is to be removed you must add citations verifying the same which you clearly did not. And Regarding Policies read this and familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Vandalism.

I’ve asked you several questions above, none of which you’ve answered. I’ve also removed your edits from my talk page, since I don’t consider you competent to be making them, and I control what’s on my talk page, not you. You generally seem unfamiliar with Wikipedia policy and how to apply it. Hölderlin2019 (talk) 21:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Unknown User

Do you have the abilitiy to block user 2001:18C0:61C:700:A96A:AAA7:3688:1448 or know another user who can. He has been making a lot of excessive and unnecessary edits to the Dragon 2 article and numerous other articles. He also has been ignoring our warnings when his edits are undid or reverted and seems to be editing the articles based on his personal preferences or like long running documentaries. Also how do you gain the ability to "revert" edits?--Killamin7 (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

@Killamin7: Well, I have reported him to an admin for his edits on the page Discoverer 17. We just have to wait until someone responds to our cause. And regarding reverts its called "Twinkle" gadget which is a popular JavaScript Wikipedia gadget that gives autoconfirmed registered users many extra options to assist them in common Wikipedia maintenance tasks and to help them deal with acts of vandalism or unconstructive edits. It provides users with three types of rollback functions and includes a full library of speedy deletion functions, user warnings and welcomes, maintenance tags, semi-automatic reporting of vandals, and more. In addition, it gives administrators more tools to help them carry out their duties. Thanks (Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC))

@Mr.Sarcastic: Thanks! I actually contacted Ferret about the IP's edits and he went ahead and blocked him for 72 hours (for now). I'll give Twinkle a try.--Killamin7 (talk) 15:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Whitney family edit revision

You left me a message regarding an edit on the Whitney family page. I'm unsure what you meant by there was not enough information, as I left an edit summary. I had posted a comment on the talk page for the article back in March asking why there was a snippet of what looked like someone's personal genealogy stuck in the article, without any context or explanation. I recommended it be removed at that time unless it had a purpose. It's nto the genealogy of the Whiteny family in general, just an arbitrary sub-piece. Since no one had responded in the almost year inbetween, I removed the content, and indicated why in the summary. If you have an issue with the removal, please let me know or take it to talk page for the article. I'm not sure what rationale there is to include the genealogy unles one wanted to start with the progenitor. The depth and breadth of the Whitney genealogy makes it cumbersome to place in an article (I'm a whitney descendant as well). Regardless, the lack of any context or description of why the content is in there greatly limits whatever relevance it was intended to have. If this is just one part of the family's personal genealogy, it does not belong on a wiki page. If it's intended to show famous Whitneys, there's already a section for that, and this genealogical format is not good for that purpose. I am going to delete the text. If you have an issue, please bring it to the talk page of the article, since I have already replied to you with my rationale.12.11.127.253 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Abraham Van Helsing

Hi! You messaged me saying to contact you on your talk page if you were wrong re: removing my edits on Abraham Van Helsing page. So yes, I'm afraid you were wrong by deleting my edits and here's why: 1) I wasn't deleting content from this page. I was re-arranging already existing content in proper re-named sections and even adding more information. 2) I explained my reasons to do so in the very first edit "This section is very screwed, it throws together versions from direct adaptations of the novel and original stories." 3) The content on this page as it was (and as it now) is arranged in the wrong manner:

First of all, the sub-sections of "On screen" section are named in a misleading manner - user did not provide any proof or confirmation that some works are "notable" while others are just "other adaptations". 

Then, currently it lumps together completely different screen versions of the character, which is very confusing and plainly messy - there are film adaptations of original novel by Stoker where the character appears and acts. There are TV adaptations of this novel with this character. And then there are other films or TV shows which ARE NOT adaptation of Stoker's novel at all, but those films or TV shows feature this character in them, in completely original stories. My edits were aimed at proper structuring all those many different versions. So I kindly ask you to revert the page back to my edits.

Please move the page Saurahtra people to Saurashtra Brahmin

I had added information about Gher Navs/Family Names in the community. Also, I made some changes in other places. Please don't delete it. I added citation from Karnataka United Sourashtra Organization on the Brahminical status further even this article has a line saying Saurashtras are Brahmins who are homogeneous. This time I will make the changes and add this citation near the name itself you can see it from there itself. I think even you might know about Gher Navs and Gotras, I checked for my family name and some of my relatives using wedding cards they all matched. I saw even you are from the Palkar community so you may know about it. Anyway please don't change it. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any queries. Also, I would be happy to work with you on improving this article. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lokeshwaran V R (talk • contribs) 07:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

@Lokeshwaran V R:I agree that you have added content but that too without proper citations. Caste based websites like you cited are not reliable and also the family names you added doesn't have proper sources it's like you have copied it from some matrimonial websites and as such sites are also not reliable. If you want to add content cite with proper academic sources like google books and trusted newspaper articles. As the content you added doesn't include those, i have removed those for now. Also don't make major changes like this without taking consensus from various editors in the talk page. As of now there are very few sources for the Saurashtra Brahmins and most sources cite them as Saurashtrians or Sourashtras. So until proper sources comes the name sticks the same. If you have any doubts feel free to drop a message in my talk page.

Also if you revert back those thrice in a 24 hours stretch you may be blocked from editing and most of your recent actions may appear to others as you are vandalizing the article and pushing your POV without any valid sources. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 10:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 08:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Reversion at Prophetic medicine

Greetings Mr.Sarcastic. Could you perhaps look a bit more closely at your previous unexplained reversion of my reversion at Prophetic medicine? As in the case here [[1]] my edit was a reversion of Original research (and in this case also synthesis). It's removal has consensus both here [[2]] and here [[3]]. I realize that dynamic IP editors suddenly going on a removal spree often invites negative suspicions and apologize for the impression. Cheers 39.37.170.148 (talk) 12:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

How can you allow hatred ?

I have been observing Wikipedia is promoting hatred towards a particular community i.e khatri community. You are approving inappropriate content which has no connection with the ancestors of this community being silk weavers. This is sheer misuse of your position as an editor. Rishabkapania77 (talk) 19:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

@Rishabkapania7: It isn't hatred as long as content comes with a reliable citations i revert them at most. Also the Khatris have varied occupations which changes from region to region The Khatris of Gujarat are Silk Weavers and the article includes the regions of Gujarat in it not only Punjabi Khatris. So there is nothing wrong about it. Thanks Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Reversion at Sankethi people

Dear Mr. Sarcastic, I'm not sure of your background or your credentials as you seem to have a wide variety of interests. To your question of my editing the contents of the Sankethi people page, it is because I myself am a Kaushika Sankethi and what I added is an accurate representation of our community, and the content that I removed is not sourced and against the tradition as handed down in our community. If you are a Sankethi or have wide knowledge of our community, I could discuss things with you, otherwise I'm not sure on what basis you are editing the content of the page that I had updated.NShashishekhar (talk) 02:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

@NShashishekhar: As an editor myself i edit lot of stuffs, and i rely on proper sources be from an academic sources or news from a reliable publisher. As far as i concern elders are not a part of reliable source and Wikipedia also doesn't condemn the hearsay content. Since you removed a part of the Sankethi people without explaining why, i have reverted those. As such i have added tags and added citations for what you have added. You before editing or removing anything from Wikipedia have to discuss those in the respective talk page and if you add something cite them from reliable sources. Thanks Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 07:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Mr. Sarcastic, your points about citations and providing reasons for editing and removing content are taken. However I would like to point out that almost all of our community's (indeed also of India's) past is preserved as an oral history, and so there is importance in tradition and the information bequeathed to us by our elders and ancestors.NShashishekhar (talk) 14:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Anarchyte (talk | work) 15:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Senaithalaivar

Senaithalivar page contain many unreliable sources so review this page. Many British Raj ear source are found in that page which is unreliable source. Tirukodimadachengunrur (talk) 08:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@Tirukodimadachengunrur: Well, I have reverted to the last best version of the article. Hope that helps!Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 08:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Mr.Sarcastic. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 19:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Teohari Georgescu

Hi. I wanted to add an audio file of Teohari Georgescu's name pronunciation, but it didn't work, so I deleted it. Please, undo the file. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masha2801 (talk • contribs) 14:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

@Masha2801: Done Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

April 23, 2020

Hello you left a message on my page about my edition on the page Love Poem (EP) but your justification for reverting my edition was invalid because I didn't remove any content, just reformulated the table within the definitions MOS: TABLECAPTION to facilitate the accessibility of wikipedia :) Jennienini (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

@Jennienini: It was reverted as you did not explained what you did in your edit summaries. But you have explained correctly now. Do like this in your future edits to avoid confusion. Thanks Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Reporting Vandalism made by an IP user

Hello, I just found out a IP user who vandalised your talk page. Ghost finders (talk) 05:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Ghost Finders (Ghost Finders)

Lynching Edit

I'm new to wikipedia. Anyways in the last lynching edit, I had added some information too. I might have deleted something by mistake too. Anyways, would appreciate if you added the bit of information that seems to have been removed in the last edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.83.66.218 (talk) 09:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Reversion about Kumbakonam wikipage

You had reverted my edits about Kumbakonam. It's very pathetic that you don't even know the necessary details before reverting. Kumbakonam falls under Mayiladuthurai Lok Sabha constituency and the current member for the constituency is Shri.S. Ramalingam. Please be knowledgeable when you do these kind of work. And also as per Indian civic laws any place or locality governed by a local body with a population of over 1 lakh can be called a city. It is not that it should be governed by a municipal corporation only. Antovicto (talk) 08:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

@Antovicto: It was reverted as you did not explained what you did in your edit summaries and also you did't even provided any sources for your claim. As per Wikipedia policies and Guidelines Yourself is not knowledgeable and there are no chance what you edit is reliable unless you provide proper sources. It really annoys me that without even reading polices people like you come here to push your pathetic POV on this encyclopedia. So before editing anywhere at least familiarize yourself about these policies

• WP:VERIFY
• WP:RS

If you would have read your welcome page correctly and come here there would be some use to you. Thanks Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 11:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

hey

I need help of writing a article Dmy1948 (talk) 12:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

"vandalism"

If I added "Paris is the capital of France" to a page, some nitwit would complain about failure to source.

Your rules are arbitrary, pathetic, and inconsistently enforced, much as I would expect from a 16-year-old mIRC chat room operator.

You have no idea of what volumes of critical content I have added to Wikipedia over the years. Alas, I forgot to cherish the words of the master in Matthew 7:6. 2601:589:4B00:C200:0:0:0:9ACE (talk) 17:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

• News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?

• In the media: Coronavirus, again and again

• Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit

• Featured content: Featured content returns

• Arbitration report: Two difficult cases

• Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night

• Gallery: Roy is doing fine and sending more photos

• Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias

• Essay: Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing

• By the numbers: Open data and COVID-19: Wikipedia as an informational resource during the pandemic

• Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Interview: Health and RfA's: An interview with Guy Macon

• In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia

• WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar!!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 14:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

List of Sengunthars

Why my contribution was removed? Tirukodimadachengunrur (talk) 07:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Edit wars in List of Mudaliars and List of Sengunthars pages

User: Kavin Mudaliyar has been adding Thuluva Vellala caste personalities like Thiru Vi Ka and Mu. Varadarajan in these wiki pages claiming them as Sengunthars without references. I have added the references that Tamil scholar Thir Vi Ka was from Vellalar community in the List of Mudaliars umpteen times. User: Kavin Mudaliar and their suspected sock accounts have been pushing their POVs thereby creating edit warring saying these 2 personalities belong to Sengunthar without an iota of reference.Srivatsarcot1 (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Third square

I'm restoring the page prior to POV edits. See this for background. 154.190.73.165 (talk) 08:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Kasimir Malevich

removed offtop information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.99.85.40 (talk) 09:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

About Ciudadanos

Hello! Some explanation about Ciudadanos in Spain. It is absolutely illiterate to put Ciudadanos into nationalist parties. From the classical political philosophy they are classical liberals with strong support of Pro-EU and free market. Liberals can't be nationalist at all because they are the only one in political spectre who are very far from natinalists. You can say that they have some relations with PP and even VOX but it does not show us nothing but possibility to have coalitions with all parties in the country. It is absolutely normal to centrism. Ciudadanos live not in two-party system. VOX and PP support free market so it could be reason to have a coalition with them for "better future". But is does not mean that Cs support conservatism and far-right nationalism. Also I can't see anything nationalistic from new leader Ines Arrimadas. She is absolutely centrist. If you find Albert Rivera Facebook page you will notice that he continues to support free market and culture liberalism and even Joe Biden in the USA. It's multiculural political view. So only left-wing propaganda of socialists and communist tries to degrade liberal parties and show that they are with far-right and they are the same as far-right. But it is left-wing propaganda. Do not listen them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.237.185.90 (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Viki Gabor

Why do you removed my edits about Viki Gabor? The chapter about her personal life is wrong. It is inconsistent with Wikipedia's policies. Wikipedia is not a place to spreading rumors about someone's life. Please restore my edits. 83.24.97.3 (talk) 15:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

I GAVE a reason

Regarding my edit on Fort Lee lane closure scandal, I gave an explicit reason in my edit. I do not appreciate being lied to. 73.81.116.0 (talk) 15:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Museum of Sologne

Hi,
thanks for being so vigilant. In fact my change was relevant as the article was no more orphan. So I re-do the change and will justify it now. Thanks a lot
--Davric (talk) 08:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC): thanks for the tips. By the way I started on WP 13 years ago and created 500+ articles. Even if I'm always learning, I know a few rules. But as I'm a bit lazzy, yes, sometimes I move too quickly. In the current case, in fact I justified my change in the previous modification but realized that I forgot to remove the "Multiple issues" mention. So did it in the same minute.
Anyway, that's now compliant with WP rules.
Have a nice day. --Davric (talk) 08:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

@Davric: Its good you are familiar with stuffs going on here. Almost all of us are learning, I didn't knew you were on Wikipedia that long as your edit count were less so i welcomed you. ThanksMr.Sarcastic (talk) 06:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Help

Hello sir, please check the page Maratha (caste) which is edits by a anonymous user with any source and i reverted these edits but latter Kleuske reverted my edits to anonymous without any enquiry. Rakshit Rathod (talk) 11:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

RE: Disruptive Editing

I think there's some confusion. If you take a look at my edit, it's not disruptive. 210.212.194.97 (talk) 14:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)