Talk:Tachyon condensation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:08, 18 May 2020

Physics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Actually, if you look at the QFT of a tachyonic field, you'd find it does not violate causality. However, it happens to be unstable with no lowest energy state. Phys 22:39, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This second statement is not correct. Just because a field is tachyonic when expanded around a certain point of the potential does not mean that there is not a minimum. The Higgs field is such an example. Joshua Davis 06:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How we can travel in time Palakula saitarun (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Maybe this article should be merged with tachyon? I'm not sure what the terminology is, but I would actually suggest that this becomes a subsection of tachyon. Joshua Davis 06:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time

How to travel in time Palakula saitarun (talk) 07:26, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

article is incomprehensible jargon

I have a phd in molecular biology and can't make head or tail of this needs , at very least the intro, re write in language that people other then astrophysics phds can undertand

I have a PhD in astrophysics, and I still get nothing out of this article 202.140.199.194 (talk) 07:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]