Jump to content

Wikipedia:Cleanup: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Aecis (talk | contribs)
Line 148: Line 148:


===November 30, 2006===
===November 30, 2006===
*[[Lizzie Borden]], mainly the section of artistic representations of Borden. I've cut one duplication. There's so much there I think I needs to be sub-sectioned by genre, or something. or maybe Lizzie herself can take an axe to it. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] 04:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
*<s>[[Lizzie Borden]], mainly the section of artistic representations of Borden. I've cut one duplication. There's so much there I think I needs to be sub-sectioned by genre, or something. or maybe Lizzie herself can take an axe to it.</s> [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] 04:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
*Vanilla option from the [[Vanilla (disambiguation)]] - leads to another disambiguation page, none of which items listed referst to the topic in question. [[User:Jackiespeel|Jackiespeel]] 17:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
*Vanilla option from the [[Vanilla (disambiguation)]] - leads to another disambiguation page, none of which items listed referst to the topic in question. [[User:Jackiespeel|Jackiespeel]] 17:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:I think I fixed. It now links directly to the section on types of options, including the vanilla variety.[[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] 05:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
:I think I fixed. It now links directly to the section on types of options, including the vanilla variety.[[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] 05:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:43, 21 December 2006

WP:CU redirects here. For Check User Requests, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser (WP:RCU). For information on changing your username, see Wikipedia:Changing username (WP:CHU). For Cleanup Templates, see Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup (WP:TC).

Please report messy articles below, explaining what needs to be cleaned up (e.g., grammar, formatting, order, or confusion). Any user can fix the articles, too. Please remove the entry from this page and cleanup tags from the page afterwards.

Feel free to make use of the Wikipedia: Cleanup resources.

Older cleanup: Category: Cleanup by month. Pages are archived by month, but are still in need of cleanup or de-listing if they have been polished.

Whether or not you think you've finished, you missed a spot!

Also remember that you can submit an article in need of cleanup to the Cleanup Taskforce (which is always looking for members).

For more detailed information about this page, see Wikipedia: Cleanup process.

If you are adding the {{cleanup}} tag to an article instead of this page, please explain what needs cleaning up on the talk page. Problems that are obvious to you may not be obvious to other editors. Tags which are unexplained are subject to removal.

Just to let everyone know, as of 08:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC), 18,794 articles were tagged for cleanup, or 1.31% of the English Wikipedia's articles. Most of these articles can be found under Category:Cleanup by month and are not listed below. Anything you can do to help clear the backlog would be greatly appreciated.


December 2006

December 21, 2006

December 20, 2006

  • Celice - This Fire Emblem character doesn't need to be Wikified, cause it fits under all the requirements, but does need a fixup in format.OBEY STARMAN 18:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

December 19, 2006

December 18, 2006

December 17, 2006

  • List of Half-Life mods - The article was recently AFD'ed, DRV'ed, and AFD'ed again with a keep consensus, on the condition that the article is improved to be more notable, and less of a gratuitous list.

December 16, 2006

December 15, 2006

  • Richmond High School (Richmond, Indiana) - Alumni listed are not graduates of school; factual cleanup needed.
  • Spread of printing - Newish article with long list of cities taken from the German "Meyers Lexicon" of 1892. List for "Germany" therefore has strong POV issues (includes Prague, "Breslau" etc. Budapest is called "Ofen" etc. Creator of article has declined to do anything about it. Needs spelling of names anglicised, links created & some headings adjusted to NPOV Johnbod 16:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 13, 2006

  • The article about Ted, the United Airlines subsidiary, has been vandalized. Please fix it.
  • Rodney King - The section entitled 'confrontation' contains incorrect facts (arms broken) and seems fairly biased against Rodney King.
  • Radu Duda, Prince of Hohenzollern-Veringen. I have started cleanup but could do with some help and advice. The article does not respect Wikipedia guidelines on Biographies of Living People, neither does it read like an Encyclopedia entry: it is more like an attempt to list all the possible and imaginable bad things ever written about the subject, who is a public figure. It expands on many minute details about Radu Hohenzollern that are useless and POV, it needs balancing. I started cleanup of the article before tagging it, as the more I advance in the cleanup, the more I saw that the article needs this process. I also see that Stefanp and some of his sockpuppets such as Carbunar,John Mathis, MihutM have been editing it, so a cleanup is certainly in order. Furthermore, the article has too many references, it litters the text, very many of them in Romanian with no translation, some of them quoting obscure little publications, (whether they are reputable or not is hard to assess), and uses as references unknown people as great experts on the subject. Stefanp and his sockpuppets have also edited King Michael of Romania's page in a similar way. The arguments on the Talk pages of both articles are illustrations of what I am writing here.[1]Marina C (2) 13:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leg - Messed up and it doesn't really make sense. It's badly written and contains no external links or sources.
  • FullArmour Studios - Need's wikifying, citations, EVERYTHING. Don't know if it's notable or not, but it looks like a new article...--JudahBlaze 23:10, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 12, 2006

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kofi_Annan

December 11, 2006

December 10, 2006

December 9, 2006

December 8, 2006

December 7, 2006

  • Peasant - needs reformatting, problems with tense, needs to be expanded.
  • Timmendorfer Strand – first paragraph is a stub, the rest is bad
  • SameGame - a bit too casual compared to Wikipedia standards
Hi, I had a look at it. Could you be much more specific about what you mean by "a bit casual"? Lovellester 20:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 6, 2006

December 5, 2006

Tydus Arandor 05:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 4, 2006

December 3, 2006

I went through the article and removed some of the more obvious spam but this article needs someone to cleanup the rest of it and to watch for more spam. --Banana04131 22:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have added more of my concerns regarding the article and added templates to the article accordingly. --tgheretford (talk) 09:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 2, 2006

  • Libyan-Chadian War needs a grammatical once-over; it looks like it was written by someone with a grasp of English vocabulary but not grammar, as verb tenses are frequently confused. I'll do it myself if it's not fixed after finals, but if anyone else would help that'd be great.
  • I ran through the article and did some purely grammatical/spelling editing. Mansfieldatron 5:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

December 1, 2006

November 2006

November 30, 2006

I think I fixed. It now links directly to the section on types of options, including the vanilla variety.Shawn in Montreal 05:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Have done some grammatical editing. Still has no citations whatsoever.Monocle1 19:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 28, 2006

Done my part Dilane 05:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just copyedited the article too, some sections and paragraphs need to be merged, I think some ideas are being repeated several times. RHB 21:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 27, 2006

  • Multi-agent_system - The article lacks a general description. There should be a long general description of MAS, and a short concrete example (not the other way round, as it is now) --JFromm 13:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Persepolis - A lot of good info here on one of the ancient world's most important cities, but it reads like it was written by someone who spoke a primary language other than English. The introduction is strong, but then it goes downhill. Lots of grammar and punctuation issues and some really weird syntax. Also, zero references. Dppowell 05:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Did some copyediting. Still has issues that I can't fix, mostly due to lack of familiarity with the subject and the fact that it was probably written by someone with English as a 2nd Language. I'm not familiar with the subject so someone else more familiar with ancient persia probably needs to look it over. Also, it needs citations desperatly. There's a good start on a solid article here, but it needs more work.--Lendorien 00:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thorough copyedit and cleanup, sorted information into sections and put into prose. RHB 16:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 26, 2006

  • Gallant Man - This article looks and sounds very much like random commentary. The intro isn't so bad, however the rest is an utter mess. Needs to be organized and copy edited into a more professional tone.-- Ryckmonster 01:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • shorter sentences and reorg. done; gives a bit of rough reading but acceptable.

Dilane 16:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • St. Louis-style pizza - It appears somone has done a (poor) re-write of this article. Citation is needed to back up claims, and NPOV needs to be employed(i.e. you can't refer to the pizza as "savory", that's POV. I love Imo's pizza as much as the next guy, but this article need to be fixed. Gamer83 04:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 25, 2006

  • Mr. Do - Someone reverted my edits after I fixed it and removed it from cleanup in Oct, claiming they were unfair based on the fact that Pac-man has a long description. I hate to say it, but what it was reverted to is a lengthly unpargraphed mess of poorly worded descriptions of the game that make little sense, are hardly readable and are not needed for an article about a game that is as non-notable as this one. I personally think that what I edited to it would have been fine and more concise, but I don't want to create a revert war here by going back to it myself. Maybe someone else can find a happy medium. See my original edit here. If you make changes, post on the Talk page to prevent a revert war with the original author. --Lendorien 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
She??? You meant he right? Besides that I'll see what I can do with it... Vic226(chat) 09:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, the infobox lists only his former teams, so naturally the current team is excluded. Nothing wrong with that. And I don't get what you are talking about the bathroom award, since it sounds like vandalism to me. Vic226(chat) 10:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cranfield - absolutely astonishing page which has many features of a good encyclopedia article.

November 24, 2006

November 23, 2006

  • Real computation - Second section of this article has some POV issues.
  • Chinese language - Many sections are disorganised and do not conform to the language template recommended by the Wikiproject of Languages. Also, subsections are misplaced, such as loanwords, which shouldn't be listed under morphology and the content is quite difficult to read. Another discrepany is when you search for Sinitic languages, it redirects you to the Spoken Chinese entry; however, when you type Chinese languages, it brings you to Chinese language. The section on Chinese characters is still unnecessarily long even though there is already a detailed article on Chinese characters. And the whole entry is just too long, it is 57kb in size, some of the clumsier sections should be rewritten for sub-articles. I do not understand how this article managed to become a featured article before, or maybe it was much better. Please contact me if anyone would like to work together on this Shingrila 05:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 22, 2006

  • Kevin Stevens - Needs simple help to clean up. Organization of the article is poorly laid out. Also, while the article appears to follow a chronological type description, it jumps all over the place leaving the reader confused. Simple headers and organization will do.

November 21, 2006

  • Xine - Needs references for the "DVD Issues" section.
  • Forest_School,_Horsham - indiscrimate and redundant listing of everything associated with the school 19:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • tattoo gun - The page on tattoo gun is problematic. Tattoo artists and educated consumers refer to them as "tattoo machines"", and there are numerous sources to back this up. Searching wikipedia for "tattoo machine" brings up nothing. I would like it if someone a bit more code-savvy than I am could rename the page "tattoo machine", and add a disambiguation link, or refer, from "tattoo gun". In the industry we know that when someone calls it a "gun" they're probably not that knowledgeable about tattooing, and I don't want wikipedia to sound uneducated about anything- especially my job! thanks, drop me a line if you can do anything to help.
    --Resonanteye 08:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)R.e.'s signed contrib edited to remedy format misconception. --Jerzyt 14:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edith Pringle: Aussie pol activist -- PoV pervades article, largely via activist jargon, e.g. "rights" and "progressive" reflect how i'd describe her goals to my allies, but you might use "privileges" and "radical" instead. Excessive use of hdgs suggests desire to shout, perhaps in order to exaggerate significance of her details.
    --Jerzyt 14:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • With the slightest change of two or three words (not "progressive" and "rights", though.) this will be a slightly less toned article. It seems fairly factual and straightforward, though. Editing now.Resonanteye

November 21, 2006

November 20, 2006

  • Paravas - I have been editing this page for style and general cleanup. This page also needs citations and some consolidation of information that is repeated in the article in different places. I am continuing to work on this article but I think it will benefit from multiple hands.Dalassa 13:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • CA Scanline- I just wrote this article but since I'm new in Wikipedia I would very much appreciate it if somebody could help me edit this aticle to improve it since I don't think it is okay yet.
  • I went in and got the wording as neutral as possible. I had to cut many entire sentences out that sounded like an ad-it could still use sources, but it's a lot easier on the eyes now.Resonanteye 09:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 19, 2006

  • Local area network - The referencing needs to be done better. There are references at the bottom but no in-text citation is provided.

November 18, 2006

Done a copyedit, needs someone with local knowledge really. The motorway names (B 451 etc) need context for the non German reader too. RHB 17:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 17, 2006

November 16, 2006

November 15, 2006

SkierRMH 11:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 13, 2006

  • Marilyn Monroe - specifically the subsection "Marilyn Monroe--the exhibit" - is gramatically poor (several misplaced commas, numerous fragmented sentences) and this section of the article is currently extremely confusing as a result. anon 23:59, 13 November 2006
  • Locus of control is grammatically poor (the plural of locus is loci), incorrectly uses terminology (says that people *are* internal/external loci, when instead it should be that they *have* internal/external loci), doesn't cite it's sources (source that women tend to have external loci more than men?), and needs major paragraph reformatting. Tarayani 02:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Garden Gnome Liberation Front is extremely confusing, makes no clear distinction between fact and fiction, is littered with grammatical/spelling mistakes, and is generally very... surreal. User:Woodenbuddha has been making good-faith attempts to clean the article up, but it still needs a lot of help from anyone even remotely familiar with the subject matter. -ryand 05:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 11, 2006

November 10, 2006

November 9, 2006

November 7, 2006

  • Armenian Genocide - POV article, any editoring pointing out the other people's stance is removed. Totally biased, bad language, only Armenian sources included, misinforming, corrupting the reality presenting like this is accepted by most of the world although the reality is otherwise and so on..Xargoth 14:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please, Xargoth, don't disrupt the cleanup process to prove a point. Aecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 15:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 6, 2006

  • Jedediah Smith This is a mess all of the information is pretty much just made up to be a joke, the article talks about hot pockets, saquatches and wizards. Please fix. 68.207.117.147 04:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mizu ni Sumu Hana is just a confusing mess. I tried to fix it myself but since I don't know anything about the series, I cannot do it accurately. What does "Rikka is hospitalized but when she finally leaves the hospital she can't move on from the trauma because she is continously attacked in several bizarre ways involving water" mean?? Even if I can fix the grammar I can't really explain what the series is about. Devotchka 01:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 5, 2006

November 4, 2006

  • Sport in Canada - Information just thrown together. It has some good information but needs a bit of rewritting.

November 3, 2006

  • Origins of Santa Claus - This article seems to need cleanup for several reasons. See its discussion page for more information.
  • Contemporary Art - although listed as a "project" this article has not been improved recently, it is still poorly organized, lacks any citations, is missing much essential information, and has a glut of irrelevant details. This is a true shame, as this is a topic on which many people have expert opinions.
  • Montreal Lacrosse Club - The first ever organized lacrosse team and the ones responsible for making the first written rules of lacrosse deserve a better article. Needs some general cleanup including just standard stuff.

November 2, 2006

  • Category of being - As a major topic in metaphysics, perhaps the biggest, it strikes me how poor this page is. It is clearly a mish-mash of different writers using inconsistent terminology (the poor quality is even reflected in the article's title: the article is called "category of being," even though the bolded word in the opening sentence is "categories of being." Before I added it, searching for "ontological scheme" did not even redirect there. I think an expert should rewrite the whole thing, starting off by giving the goal (to create a minimal, exhaustive, and exclusive list of all the fundamental kinds (no universal negative categories, or disjunctive categories) of things that exist) - i.e. a category has to "earn" a place on the list by proving itself to be irreducible to other categories, or capable of being eliminated entirely. In the second part, s/he should then list the categories that have been argued to exist (be generous in this part, since reductive/eliminative arguments will come next). And in the third part, s/he should discuss arguments for/against certain categories e.g. Hume argued that space and time don't "deserve" a category on the list because they are only constructs of the human mind.
  • Mechanics lien - This article could use some section headings to differentiate the subject matter of each paragraph.
  • Resveratrol - The subject of this article has been frontpage news world wide as a result of the release of results from a 'fat mice' experiment at Harvard (Dr Sinclair) suggesting that there is a possible escape from the generally undesirable consequences (liver, heart, arterial, metabolic disease, including diabetes mellitus) of over indulgence. This article does not do WP justice in that it is full of suggestive allusions, including to this (these) compound(s)'s use in the diet supplement industry, particulalry the unusual US version of it due to Congress having 'saved' the vitamin industry in the early '90s. Improvement can't be limited to textual review as some of the technical material also requires review. Given the news coverage, improvement is somewhat urgent. See Talk. ww 17:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 1, 2006

October 2006

  • Eureka Stockade - Left wing bias. Example: "However the event...became a rallying cry as the call for federation and nationhood gained momentum in the 1890s."

October 30, 2006

  • Tecmo Super Bowl- Some gramatical errors. Needs expanded info on SNES version, which I added but can't contribute much for.

October 29, 2006

October 28, 2006

  • Era & ERA (1st is organized w/ emphasis on etymology, usage, and near-obsolete calendar systems; 2nd is Dab): Era (geology) (which probably should be Geological era) has its lk buried in Era & is unmentioned on ERA. General disfunctionality & probable WP:MOS violations.Jerzyt

October 27, 2006

  • Investor relations. At a quick glance, this looks like it was created by people from http://www.zangani.com. I removed the plug for their site, but the article itself is very much in need of cleanup. Jun-Dai 23:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Podiatrist Introduction is not bad, but the rest of the article needs a lot of work. The sections for the various countries are particularly hard to follow and repetitive, and have no wiki markup. The list of conditions(?) also seems unnecessary, although some items could be incorporated into a more informative section on the work of a Podiatrist. I also get the feeling, from many parts of the article, that the text has just been copied from another source. —anskas 23:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


October 23, 2006

October 22, 2006

October 19, 2006

Couldn't find a version to revert to without losing significant amounts of new content, but cleaned up by hand. Seraphimblade 01:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 17, 2006

Some proof reading/npov work done. Reformatting and further editing still required. Kedlav 08:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 16, 2006

Essentially there were too many pictures in one small section of text so I moved them until it looked better. The text was being covered over because the |left| alignment was interfering with the layout, given the proximity of so many other images. After I'd moved a couple elsewhere I changed it to |right|. If you look at the page history you will see it was more trial and error than anything else. I removed the tag but you may wish to check that its done to your satisfaction. Ben MacDui 18:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 15, 2006

  • Firedog was tagged for advert cleanup on October 4th. I've asked for a 3rd party to look it over on the talk page, but nobody has yet. There could be some advert language under the 'services' section, I would appreciate if someone could look it over. Staus 05:44, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've nominated the article for speedy deletion. The entire article is flooded with adverts and pr talk. I have no problem with an article about this company, but the article as it stands is spam. 10:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

October 14, 2006

  • St. Johnsbury Academy Contains personal references to staff and facilities. No or unclear elaboration in certain areas of article.

Requires rewritting Rajrajmarley 19:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 13, 2006

October 12, 2006

  • Igarassu has been tagged for cleanup since November 17, 2005. It still needs a lot of work, so I'm bringing it up here, so that someone who knows the city may have a go at cleaning this up. I'm too naive. 19:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 11, 2006

October 10, 2006

October 6, 2006

  • Harry Baron(60-something Israeli sculptor): wikify; prosify; rescale photos; probable self promotion, so check notability; format reeks of being prepared for another medium, so do further copyvio checks.Jerzyt
  • José Rizal(Phillipine nationalist activist, writer, martyr): de-PoV, esp. de-hagiographify; condense or split; state early and clearly what his notability is, beyond the (non-verified (and AFAI could stand to read, inexplicable) worship of him by Ph. or Malay nationalists.Jerzyt

October 4, 2006

  • Buck Nelson: ("classic" '50s UFO "contactee)-swallows his implausible and utterly unverifiable story whole. PoV-ectomy needed.Jerzyt

October 3, 2006

October 2, 2006

Did the best I could! Crispy1995 22:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


September 2006

September 30, 2006

September 29, 2006

September 28, 2006


September 25, 2006

I can think of two good reasons for tagging this article AFD (Article for Deletion):
  1. Non-notable. No high school is notable, unless a peace treaty was signed there or something.
  2. A far stronger case can be made for copyright violation. See this page.
--Ling.Nut 19:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 24, 2006

  • Flagging Marathi language for cleanup. This article was recently updated, and the changes need to be copy-edited into more standard English.

September 23, 2006

September 22, 2006

  • Flagging Skies of Arcadia for cleanup. I have wrote (sic) a lot of new content which needs to be proofread and rephrased. Characters section contains a lot of white space due to picture formatting, perhaps a group image of the characters would be appropriate.
  • Sara Payne: A Mother's Story. This is mainly the product of one author, with minor inputs from a couple of others. It is full of POV and reads like a school essay rather than an article. It needs a good copyeditor to take it and shake it. Fiddle Faddle 21:44, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 21, 2006

September 20, 2006

  • Flagging Communication for cleanup. Very poorly written, and may need expert attention on the subject.

September 18, 2006

September 16, 2006

Have been working to Englishify this article, but it's still way too long. Guidance, anyone? --Icenine378 22:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not much there. Reformatted some and marked as stub.Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 23:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Career Launcher - reads like an ad, notability is borderline. Aecis Appleknocker Flophouse 12:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jessica Drake and Brad Armstrong (porn star) - I have received several e-mails, apparently from jessica drake herself:
    i'm relatively new to wikipedia, but i get emails from people all over the world about my entry on it. They are fans of mine, and they are questioning the source of the entry. you see, i'm jessica drake, Wicked Pictures Contract girl, and I am the person who last night made changes to the entry "jessica drake". First of all, my name is NOT capitalized. ever. this is my choice, not a proofreading error. also, that was my actual bio, i wrote it, so it is not copywritten by any other party. there were several inaccuracies in the original article, so i corrected them, and updated it. then you took it down. please correct this matter, or if you'd like, i can have the legal department at Wicked contact you or anyone else from Wikipedia.
    Brad Armstrong, the porn star, not the wrestler- is my boyfriend of 2 1/2 years. His entry is lifted straight from another site (violating that copyright thing you harrassed me about), and although he was married to Jenna Jameson, he was never married to Dyanna Lauren.
    • I have checked the contents of the latter article (using a simple Google search), and indeed about two sentences seem to have been taken from the IMDB biography or a similar source. This might constitute fair use, but the website should be listed as a source. (If the rest of the article can also be identified as coming from an outside source, it should be removed as a copyright violation.) Being Czech and not very knwledgeable about the porn scene, I wasn't able to verify the facts, but updated and moved the Jessica Drake article anyway. - Mike Rosoft 09:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Note that "jessica drake", in lowercase, is a trademark. However, if her name is Jessica Drake, then per common sense and provisions of the Manual of Style, we write it in title case, as with every other human being's name. We are not obliged to use the trademarked form, although we could mention it in the leader of the article. WhiteLightning 09:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Forum administrator - rather badly written (very informal style etc.), I suggest redirecting to Forum moderator and mentioning the difference between a moderator and an administrator there. - Mike Rosoft 15:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 15, 2006

  • Rights of Man The article is extremly cluttered and lacking of any sources. It could be divided into subsections and some parts removed or merged into other wikipedia articles.
Took a first pass, there needs to be more done though. Sunspeck 06:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 13, 2006

September 12, 2006

September 10, 2006

September 7, 2006

September 6, 2006

Did what I could. Rewrote part. Made bullet points into paragraphs. Removed extraneous links. If it's not germane, it's not germane. If in text, no need in links section. Incorporated and expanded some internal links into paragraph. Still needs proofing. Needs sources. :) Dlohcierekim 16:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 5, 2006

  • Chikungunya - The new virulent form of this mosquito borne disease is now raging through India, having infected over 1 million people in the last few months. It has the potential to infect hundreds of millions in India and elsewhere in Asia, and to disrupt world travel. The bottom of the page has become a sort of bulletin board for breaking news and resources, and is in great need of attention. As infection rates can surpass 50% of a locality's population, and Wikipedia ranks #1 for a search on this disease, significant editing would greatly benefit those seeking information.

September 4, 2006

September 3, 2006

September 2, 2006

  • Delta Upsilon - Not scholarly at all, trivial paragraphs, needs to be seriously worked on. Reads like it was copied from a fraternity brochure.
  • Lionel Pickering - The article uses several slang/informal terms and expressions.

September 1, 2006

  • E-marketing, Online marketing - These two articles, with 100s of incoming links need a complete rewrite. There's a massive chunk of content in both articles which just refers to one book by Dave Chaffey, who originally wrote the E-marketing article in 2003[4] under the usename User:Dchaffey. The E-marketing article was expanded following this by various anons using only Chaffey's definition of e-marketing, and then forked out onto the online marketing article in which Chaffey's work forms the bulk of the article. Now maybe Chaffey wrote the absolute tome of intenet marketing and everyone in the industry uses his definition, in which case it would be OK. But I doubt that somehow. Online marketing and E-marketing need rewrites. Couple this with the fact that we have a un-Chaffey article at internet marketing which should probably be merged makes this a big job. - Hahnchen 21:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2006

August 31, 2006

  • Marina (TV series) - Sorry for listing the article twice. I had attempted to clean it up, and now it's a mess again. A part seems to be taken from an outside source (I had previously removed other infringing material), the rest of the writing is just horrible. And the entire article is malformatted. Needs a complete rewrite! - Mike Rosoft 20:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have undeleted the article and reverted it to my revision. It still needs a lot of work - perhaps some of the non-infringing content added to the article could be useful? - Mike Rosoft 08:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • I rewrote the copyvio part and integrated it with the childish plot synopsis. Deflufffed. Left out the lyrics-- they don't belong in the article. It's still lame, but there wasn't a lot of meat with the fluff . :) Dlohcierekim 00:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 30, 2006

August 29, 2006

August 26, 2006

August 25, 2006

  • Kurt Nehrling I have a rough translation from German articles on Kurt and I would like some assistance in making the article clearer as well as add reference historical links.

--Mobilelearn 15:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 24, 2006


August 21, 2006

August 17, 2006

  • Mara Salvatrucha - It looks like the gang this article is about may be getting overly involved in writing it. The best I could do was to fix up some punctuation errors. There are virtually no citations in any of the article, the grammar looks like a 5th grader wrote it, and I'm tempted to call their section on enemies a wikipedia enabled hit-list. Here's a quote from the discussion "it3 im C^ripK N i wanna say dat wikipedia needs sum more info bout gangs, even tho im C^ripK i noe sum MS shit. Cause they in ma bKloCC tha 13 stands 4 southside, tha 13th letter on tha alphabKet M 4 mexican mafia, dats sureno slang N shit, bKut MS took tha 13 2 reppK it 4 them" I'm tempted to delete it because I don't even know what it means, but I don't know the wikipedia policy on this. This article needs some serious love and attention from people who know more about it than me. -NorsemanII 09:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 16, 2006

August 15, 2006

August 14, 2006

August 12, 2006

August 11, 2006

I've removed a lot of the excessive capitalisation in the titles. It reads like an article from a Fan Mag - deifinitely not up to Wiki standards. It needs a lot of clean up and objectification. I'll do a bit more when I've got time. Derby Dave 16:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 7, 2006

  • Bradford Bishop(bio of 30-year cold-case American murderer of own family, w/ dip. passport)+Did some cleanup, removed data for conspiracy theory that has no evidence given of notability. Still needs true-crime tone (implicit voice of Robert Stack!) removed, syntax tersified, etc, etc.Jerzyt

August 6, 2006

Removed copy vio. Perhaps spmeone could rephrase and bring the info back. :) Dlohcierekim 14:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


August 4, 2006

fixed formatting by removing [citation needed] tags Skapur 00:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 3, 2006

August 2, 2006

August 1, 2006

  • Kanye West - This article should be cleaned up, bad grammar in many places, quite messy.
  • YTCracker - This article has escaped VfD twice, but there has been a consensus that cleanup is required.

July 2006

July 30, 2006

Please see my explanations of my concerns relating to the problems of inaccuracy of format and other inaccuracies being introduced for the past week into the first article (Charles Jacobs) and since yesterday the second article (Harold Pinter) by at least one other editor, SlimVirgin. She is continually (over and over again) reverting correct format to incorrect format and also reverting previously-deemed unverified or unsupported information by putting it back in the article without any checking or knowledge of the sources or the subject of the article or the format styles. These reversions are continually introducing mistakes and inaccuracies in these articles of living persons and also violating WP:BLP and WP:Citing Sources and WP:Reliable sources, as well as policies relating to Wikipedia:Five pillars. If she and other editors commenting in the articles' and my talk pages are administrators, I feel that they are abusing their privileges as administrators and not maintaining NPOV or even common courtesy, much less stated Wikipedia policies re: respecting the work of others. I have tried to bring these problems to these editors' attention, but to no avail. They basically gang up on me and attempt to make it seem that I do not know Wikipedia policies, but I have read the policies, and I do know what they are. That is why I am lodging these complaints.

(Other problematic things are being done to the Charles Jacobs-related articles by some other editors as well.)

Please see the talk pages of the articles (and those linked in the CJ article. Please see the pages on disputes about "accuracy" and "clean up". Thank you--NYScholar 00:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


July 29, 2006

opening section cleaned up Kendrick7 04:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 27, 2006

July 26, 2006

  • Image:Death Penalty World Map3.png - this image is a (modified?) copy of Image:Death Penalty World Map2.png, which is on Commons. I have placed a tag at its description page to list everything that is wrong with it:
    The same mistake has occurred as in the previous version: Libya, which is by no means abolitionist in practice, has been marked as such. The map needs a thorough check against Use of death penalty worldwide to make sure that no more errors have crept in. (Western Sahara has been changed from "abolitionist in practice" to "retentionist", and it does not appear in the list; are there any references to legal death penalty use [as opposed to extrajudicial executions committed by armed groups] there?) In addition, it is inconsistent to mark states which have abolished death penalty by the 1972 Supreme Court decision (or earlier by law, or - if there is such - had reinstated it after the verdict and then abolished it again) as abolitionist in practice, while marking states where death penalty has recently been abolished on the grounds of the state constitutions (often because of technicalities) as abolitionist for all crimes. I don't think that any state can be considered to be abolitionist for all crimes, and I am not sure that the AI classification is useful for them: even in the states where the death penalty doesn't exist the perpetrator could, at least in theory, face death penalty under the federal law (which did happen in Michigan). The claim that federal death penalty is not being used is not true, either - see Timothy McVeigh, executed in 2001. (Added by another user: The data for the Caucasus region is incorrect and waiting to be changed, as the map indicates that Armenia retains the death penalty in some form, whereas the table says the opposite.) - Mike Rosoft 18:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I have confirmed that Armenia has been marked incorrectly in all the versions. - Mike Rosoft 19:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Information on the Philippines is also outdated in Image:Death Penalty World Map2.png, since death penalty has recently been re-abolished there. (Image:Death Penalty World Map.png and Image:Death Penalty World Map3.png are correct.) - Mike Rosoft 19:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I believe that rather than fixing this image, it would be better to delete both Image:Death Penalty World Map2.png and Image:Death Penalty World Map3.png, go back to Image:Death Penalty World Map.png, and fix the error with Belarus (as well as possible others). - Mike Rosoft 18:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    As for the supreme court case, it did not abolish the death penalty, it was only as to the application in that case and as to that law. Inmates were still on death row. Either way, that is moot with the recent supreme court case (Kansas v. Marsh) (June 26, 2006)LH 19:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


July 24, 2006

July 23, 2006

July 22, 2006

July 21, 2006

Have removed that par, and similar ref in the intro., If anyone wants to replace it they will need to provide references. Remove tag too.Moriori 03:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cleaned it up, but looking at its history, every time someone removes the biased section, someone else comes along and reverts it back in. We'll see how long it lasts this time --Goldrushcavi 19:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 20, 2006

July 19, 2006

July 18, 2006

July 17, 2006

July 15, 2006

  • Alexandra Roos - The article seems to have potential, but there is no context established at this time for the article to be called a stub. --Spring Rubber 19:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clunia - This appears to be almost entirely a paper of some sort, anonymously contributed. I'm hoping (but not certain) that the anon who submitted it is, indeed the person who wrote it (impossible to make an educated guess, because there are no other edits from that IP address, so nothing to compare to). Utterly not in Wikipedia style, has POV issues, not wikified, etc. - Jmabel | Talk 22:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 14, 2006


July 11, 2006

July 10, 2006

  • Teaching English as a Foreign Language -- No category, smells like SPAM, needs attention and expansion... also wikify to other see also topics.
  • Something For Kate -- The information is correct but the page is really badly formatted and it needs images.
  • Polish Catholic Church -- article appears to be a machine assisted translation of the Polish Wikipedia page, and need significant attention from someone who speaks the lanugage, or is aware of its context.

July 9, 2006


July 6, 2006

July 5, 2006


July 3, 2006

  • Nichola Holt Horrible article that reads like something off myspace but I'm not sure what should go and what should stay.
  • The Alien Legacy. Not immediately obvious if this is about the movies or games. And if the Quadrilogy came out later, does Legacy have 3 titles or the 4 listed.--J Clear 15:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 2, 2006

June 2006

June 21-29, 2006

June 1-20, 2006

May 2006