User:Smallus Editus/Treaty of Uxbridge: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m working draft |
m working draft |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| <!-- political moderate / religious moderate --> |
| <!-- political moderate / religious moderate --> |
||
<div style="column-count: 2;">{{plainlist}} |
<div style="column-count: 2;">{{plainlist}} |
||
* Charles I <ref>Various sources blame the failure of talks on the king's stubbornness. However, the proceedings from the event reveal a pattern of Parliament proposing absurdly one-sided measures, the King responding with proposals that meet them halfway, and Parliament refusing to budge. Given that the proceedings likely reflect the work of secretaries allied with Parliament (Thurloe and Earle), it is reasonable to suppose |
* Charles I <ref>Various sources blame the failure of talks on the king's stubbornness (c.f. [[Algernon Percy, 10th Earl of Northumberland#Conversion to the peace faction|Algernon Percy § Conversion to the peace faction]]). However, the proceedings from the event reveal a pattern of Parliament proposing absurdly one-sided measures, the King responding with proposals that meet them halfway, and Parliament refusing to budge. Given that the proceedings likely reflect the work of secretaries allied with Parliament (Thurloe and Earle), it is reasonable to suppose their reporting was not unduly biased to favor the king.<br/>{{cite book |last=Rushworth |first=John |chapter=Historical Collections: The treaty at Uxbridge, 1645 |pages=787-843 |editor-last=Browne |editor-first=D |title=Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 5, 1642-45 |year=1721 |orig-year=orig. before 1690 |location=London |via=[http://www.british-history.ac.uk British History Online] |url=http://www.british-history.ac.uk/rushworth-papers/vol5/pp787-843 |access-date=20 May 2020}}</ref> |
||
* John Ashburnham |
* John Ashburnham |
||
* Arthur Capel |
* Arthur Capel |
Revision as of 20:04, 21 May 2020
This article contains original, highly subjective assessments. |
Attitudes
- Religious hard-liner
- Insists that church government throughout the Three Kingdoms be episcopalian (Royalist) or presbyterian (Roundhead).
- Political hard-liner
- Insists that full control over taxation and the military goes to the King (Royalist) or Parliament (Roundhead).
- Moderate
- Willing to compromise on these issues.
There were other issues (e.g., pardon for combatants), but these two issues dominated the debates.
Parliamentary commissioners are in italics. Scottish commissioners are in small font.
Religious | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Moderate | Unknown | Hard-liner | ||
Political | Moderate |
|
|
|
Unknown |
|
|
| |
Hard-liner |
|
|
|
References
- ^ Various sources blame the failure of talks on the king's stubbornness (c.f. Algernon Percy § Conversion to the peace faction). However, the proceedings from the event reveal a pattern of Parliament proposing absurdly one-sided measures, the King responding with proposals that meet them halfway, and Parliament refusing to budge. Given that the proceedings likely reflect the work of secretaries allied with Parliament (Thurloe and Earle), it is reasonable to suppose their reporting was not unduly biased to favor the king.
Rushworth, John (1721) [orig. before 1690]. "Historical Collections: The treaty at Uxbridge, 1645". In Browne, D (ed.). Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 5, 1642-45. London. pp. 787–843. Retrieved 20 May 2020 – via British History Online.{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help)|via=
- ^ https://archive.org/details/england05claruoft