User talk:Faust-RSI

May 2020

I was about to block you for edit-warring, nut noticed that you have formally not been warned, and decided to give you one chance to stop. One more revert will get your account blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Now I had to start a topic about you at WP:ANI, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: ‎Faust-RSI and civility, please respond there if you wish to.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Faust-RSI, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CMD (talk) 19:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Turkmenistan

Hello, I'm Sangdeboeuf. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Turkmenistan in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In your edit of 19:00, 24 May 2020, you did not simply separate "independence and acceptance to the UN", you removed sourced information about the (former) name of the country, which is the subject of an ongoing discussion, without explaining why. Please stop your disruptive edit-warring. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I removed it because there is only some article with a name, but not a single document was provided. Going by this article, the name "Republic of Turkmenistan" existed after independence in 1991 and according to the UN, starting from 1992 it was already just Turkmenistan. If you think we should go into this much details about it, I will correct that part accordingly. Faust-RSI (talk) 19:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I removed it because there is only some article with a name, but not a single document was provided. If you're questioning the reliability of the source itself, you can bring it up at WP:RS/N. The published source I cited, along with several others given on the talk page, are enough to verify that the name Republic of Turkmenistan was used initially. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

@Sangdeboeuf: I've managed to find the actual declaration. Except it wasn't a declaration, like in other post-soviet countries, it was a constitutional law. This law is actually on the wiki: https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Конституционный_закон_Туркменистана_о_независимости_и_основах_государственного_устройства_Туркменистана_от_27.10.1991 It establishes that country changes its name from the Soviet one to just "Turkmenistan". Thus your "source" is incorrect and should be deleted, replacing with actual law (published in "Ведомости Меджлиса Туркменистана, 1991 г.", № 15, page 152). Faust-RSI (talk) 21:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Your recent editing history at Turkmenistan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have made five reverts (undoing another's contribution in whole or in part) in the last 24 hours. Kindly self-revert or expect a report at WP:AN3. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guy (help!) 19:47, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Faust-RSI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

biased accusations about personal attacks (where?when?to whom?) while no investigation is made on the reported admin Ymblanter abusing his admin powers

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=biased accusations about personal attacks (where?when?to whom?) while no investigation is made on the reported admin Ymblanter abusing his admin powers |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=biased accusations about personal attacks (where?when?to whom?) while no investigation is made on the reported admin Ymblanter abusing his admin powers |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=biased accusations about personal attacks (where?when?to whom?) while no investigation is made on the reported admin Ymblanter abusing his admin powers |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}