User talk:Mark.malewski: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:33, 27 May 2020

Aviation articles

You might find it easier to start with aclean template by using Template:WPAVIATION creator--Petebutt (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong aircraft

Presumably all the Convair 116 bits will be eradicated?--Petebutt (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Convair Model 200

Hi Mark, are you finished with your major work on Draft:Convair Model 200? To my somewhat-experienced wiki-eyes, it looks good enough to go to mainspace as -is, but I wanted to see if you had anything left you needed to work on first. I'll give you a few days to respond, and the make my own decision if I don't hear back from you. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 22:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I believe it should be good! We can always add some additional “polish” later, but it’s fine! Thanks! Mark.malewski (talk) 21:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: User talk page

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Arkhandar. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated offense for the 2nd time.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Arkhandar, you may be blocked from editing. Repeated offense for the 3rd time.

~ Arkhandar ^{(message me)} 00:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Arkhandar. I do not see anything in that user's conduct that indicates they are editing in bad faith. Thus, your accusations of vandalism are inappropriate. If you have a concern about article or infobox content, I suggest you engage in a civil discussion at the article in question's talk page. However, continued unfounded accusations of vandalism are unacceptable and could be viewed as a personal attack and dealt with accordingly. —C.Fred (talk) 00:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:08, 27 May 2020 edit Arkhandar (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,558 edits →Warning: User talk page: new section Tag: 2017 wikitext editor ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:33, 27 May 2020 edit undo C.Fred (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 277,596 edits →Warning: User talk page: uw-agf2 Next edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:

	~ [[User:Arkhandar\|<b style="color: #8cc5ff;">''Arkhandar''</b>]] <sup>([[User talk:Arkhandar\|<b style="color: #b3b3b3;">''message me''</b>]])</sup> 00:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)		~ [[User:Arkhandar\|<b style="color: #8cc5ff;">''Arkhandar''</b>]] <sup>([[User talk:Arkhandar\|<b style="color: #b3b3b3;">''message me''</b>]])</sup> 00:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

			[[File:Information orange.svg\|25px\|alt=Information icon]] Please remember to [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith\|assume good faith]] when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on [[:User talk:Arkhandar]]. ''I do not see anything in that user's conduct that indicates they are editing in bad faith. Thus, your accusations of vandalism are inappropriate. If you have a concern about article or infobox content, I suggest you engage in a ''civil'' discussion at the article in question's talk page. However, continued unfounded accusations of vandalism are unacceptable and could be viewed as a [[WP:NPA\|personal attack]] and dealt with accordingly.''<!-- Template:uw-agf2 --> —'''[[User:C.Fred\|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred\|talk]]) 00:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)