User talk:Mark.malewski: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
TurboSonic (talk | contribs) Undid revision 959069461 by Mark.malewski (talk) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Yeah, I believe it should be good! We can always add some additional “polish” later, but it’s fine! Thanks! [[User:Mark.malewski|Mark.malewski]] ([[User talk:Mark.malewski#top|talk]]) 21:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC) |
Yeah, I believe it should be good! We can always add some additional “polish” later, but it’s fine! Thanks! [[User:Mark.malewski|Mark.malewski]] ([[User talk:Mark.malewski#top|talk]]) 21:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
== May 2020 == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|stop attacking]] other editors, as you did on [[:Talk:PCI Express]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''You've acknowledged my message to you that unfounded accusations of vandalism are unacceptable, and you just added one to the article talk page. You need to back down from the allegations of vandalism '''immediately'''.''<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 00:42, 27 May 2020 (UTC) |
|||
I am not attacking anyone. I am stating that the information/changes that they are making are incorrect and vandalism. You keep saying it's in "good faith" but it's wrong and incorrect. It's called vandalism. |
|||
It would be best for everyone to "take a break" and leave the PCI Express page alone. I'm sure there are other pages that he can vandalize. |
Revision as of 00:50, 27 May 2020
Aviation articles
You might find it easier to start with aclean template by using Template:WPAVIATION creator--Petebutt (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Wrong aircraft
Presumably all the Convair 116 bits will be eradicated?--Petebutt (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Convair Model 200
Hi Mark, are you finished with your major work on Draft:Convair Model 200? To my somewhat-experienced wiki-eyes, it looks good enough to go to mainspace as -is, but I wanted to see if you had anything left you needed to work on first. I'll give you a few days to respond, and the make my own decision if I don't hear back from you. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 22:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, I believe it should be good! We can always add some additional “polish” later, but it’s fine! Thanks! Mark.malewski (talk) 21:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:PCI Express. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You've acknowledged my message to you that unfounded accusations of vandalism are unacceptable, and you just added one to the article talk page. You need to back down from the allegations of vandalism immediately. —C.Fred (talk) 00:42, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
I am not attacking anyone. I am stating that the information/changes that they are making are incorrect and vandalism. You keep saying it's in "good faith" but it's wrong and incorrect. It's called vandalism.
It would be best for everyone to "take a break" and leave the PCI Express page alone. I'm sure there are other pages that he can vandalize.