User talk:Bossanoven

Your recent reports to AIV

A few friendly notes, just so you know:

• Warning users, followed by another disruptive edit from that user, is generally a prerequisite for reporting to AIV
• The reported user will generally need to still be actively editing. If no edits have been made in several days then the report will likely be declined
• Some edits may not be appropriate, but still made in good-faith. Examples are those made by John lennon fan011. Here's it's best to try to talk to them and explain why their edits were not appropriate for an encyclopedia, before issuing any warnings

Exceptions include the most severe of vandalism, namely WP:BLP violations, or anything with legal consideration. Best! — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Bringing this back up as your reports at AIV today were similar, in particular Special:Contributions/Shenaemurphy. Those edits do not appear to be vandalism (don't mind ClueBot). Please be more careful, thanks :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 03:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

I guess this is the fourth time I've contacted you about this (I was unaware of your username change). I notice several other complaints from patrolling admins for AIV and UAA. I'm not sure where to go from here, as you should by now understand how it works. I find your diligence to keep the wiki clean admirable, but we don't want to clutter the noticeboard with inaccurate reports. This is a joint operation between the reporter (you) and the responder (sysop), we both need to do our part. Thanks for your understanding. — MusikAnimal ^talk 03:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: Are you reading what I'm reading? The account added in that someone was dating someone else, without a reference to support it. And the person in question is like 14, so I hardly think it would be public domain. - Bossanoven (talk) 03:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Refer to the definition set out in the first sentence of Wikipedia:Vandalism. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 03:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

What is this, I'm not allowed to talk? - Bossanoven (talk) 03:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

? Not sure what you mean—I was (butting in and) saying the relevant point to your query is found in the first sentence of Wikipedia:Vandalism: to be vandalism, the edit must be a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Adding information that says that so-and-so is dating so-and-so doesn't meet this definition, since such an edit is most likely added in a good faith attempt to add up-to-date info to an article. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 03:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, and in addition to the many other inaccurate reports you've made in the past, you appear to to be grossly misusing rollback [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Combined with your apparent WP:BITE tendency I believe rollback may not be fit for you at this time, so I have revoked the user right. Take a moment to review Wikipedia:Vandalism and more importantly Wikipedia:Assume good faith. You are going to need to be more careful. — MusikAnimal ^talk 03:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your examples are all from when I was either a) undoing vandalism further back that had not been properly reverted by the most recent edit, or b) reverting a blocked IP address that is a suspected sock. I thought you had removed it as a punitive measure. - Bossanoven (talk) 03:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

You may also wish to review Wikipedia:Rollback#When to use rollback. Blocked or not that's not what rollback is for, especially when some edits are fully constructive. There's more diffs where that came from ([6] [7]). Rest assured I have not actioned punitively. I apologize as I do not mean to quarrel but it's important to understand why you are being repeatedly confronted about your counter-vandalism activity. — MusikAnimal ^talk 03:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Bossanoven, the last 3 edits you rollbacked occurred around 05:29, 16 February 2015, yet the IP was blocked afterwards at 06:54, 16 February 2015. I'm confused as to why you would claim you were reverting the edits of a blocked IP. Even so, the rollback rationale does not permit one to revert an edit solely because the individual operates a blocked IP, account, or is a suspected sock. In regards to your first point, it also states that you can only use rollback when the vandalism is abundantly clear. It would have been better for you to undo the edits and have provided an edit summary. As such, I must agree that MusikAnimal's removal of your rollback permission was appropriate. Mike V • Talk 04:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gettys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Getty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Songs by album

Category:Songs by album, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

NBA Winning Streaks

I'm not the guy who made the edit, but I can see why it was made. With Atlanta's streak well into the top 20, the streaks tied at 15 are enough to complete the top 20 streaks of all time. The title at the top of the chart does say 'Top 20 streaks', so the streaks now tied for 21st place were eliminated by that guy. 00:21, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Plagiarism controversies involving Led Zeppelin

Category:Plagiarism controversies involving Led Zeppelin, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:47, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

NBA WikiProject

HI,

I'm a grad student at American University, and I am looking to get involved in the NBA Wikiproject. Let me know how I can help and what is needed most at this time!

TehSharp — Preceding unsigned comment added by TehSharp (talk • contribs) 20:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

The Who singles discography/Go to the Mirror!

Hi, "Go to the Mirror!" was an Australia only single according to what I've seen, and wasn't a US/UK single.

As for my sources, I use liner notes (thewho.net) and the book The Who by Numbers: The Story of the Who Through Their Music. Beatleswhobeachboys (talk) 20:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

If it is worth noting, I did find that it was released as a promo only single in the UK, but wasn't released as a single to the public. Beatleswhobeachboys (talk) 20:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I probably shouldn't have made so many, but they make it easier to get from track to track. Plus each album has around 5-10 song articles. Beatleswhobeachboys (talk) 00:22, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Rubber Soul

Category:Rubber Soul, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 11:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Another Side of Bob Dylan

Template:Another Side of Bob Dylan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richhoncho (talk) 19:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Times They Are a-Changin'

Template:The Times They Are a-Changin' has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richhoncho (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

User:ViLar at WP:AIV

I'm hesitant to perform the block that you requested. Is there an "official" weight for these people? This edit, for example, seems completely reasonable. Unless we're bound to give exactly what's on http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/203145 for this guy, it seems rather silly to give a precise weight: it's going to change every time he eats dinner, and may even change from when he enters to when he leaves a bathroom. Unless we have some sort of project standard (which I will enforce, if presented with it), it appears to me much more reasonable to prefer a round number, such as 200 pounds in this case, over false precision. Nyttend (talk) 22:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

@Nyttend: Materialscientist blocked for a week. Yes, the NBA's site gives "official" parameters of these players. - Bossanoven (talk) 22:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Indenting your statement But I mean, is it official in the sense that this weight is used widely by people aside from the NBA? In other words, if the NBA says 201 pounds and we say 200, will the stats junkies think that we're wrong because we differ from what's said elsewhere? Nyttend (talk) 22:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm fairly certain that the NBA intentionally uses fairly round numbers, such as to the nearest 5. And I'm fairly certain that WikiProject NBA uses the NBA as its source for this information. - Bossanoven (talk) 22:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Black Sabbath (album)

There is little point creating these templates as they will probably be deleted. I don't see much support for those I have already nominated for deletion. --Richhoncho (talk) 18:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello!

When you're sending reports to WP:AIV, please can you ensure that the reports are recent and that the user is still active? Any questions feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks :)--5 albert square (talk) 02:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Negguhz

Why do you think it ought to be blocked? As you note, it's 2+ years stale; I don't see a need to block such a long-not-used account, but I'm open to being convinced otherwise. Nyttend (talk) 04:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

No, I mean, why do you think that we need to block anyone whose only activity was nineteen edits more than two years ago? In general, I won't block anyone who's so long inactive, regardless of the problem; why do you think I ought to make an exception here? Nyttend (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Basketball games in which Michael Jordan played

Category:Basketball games in which Michael Jordan played, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

REVOLVER (BEATLES ALBUM)

I do hope these redirects are keeping you amused, if not, they are totally pointless because the search function in WP is not case sensitive. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

@Richhoncho: I am done creating them, however, they are not pointless at all, as anyone can create a said case-sensitive titled article within Wikipedia such as in their sandbox. In effect, it might actually deter certain activity. - Bossanoven (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Quite. You will have stopped some idiot wasting their time creating pointless redirects. Surely there is something you can do to contribute to WP? --Richhoncho (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

I think you mean to say I will have deterred the creation of garbage articles that libel the real thing. But, yes, I can do other things as well. - Bossanoven (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

No I said exactly what I meant. There is nothing to stop somebody adding words or amending your redirect, or as you put it, "creation of garbage articles that libel the real thing." --Richhoncho (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

I keep these redirects on my watchlist. I do admit it is somewhat ambiguous as to the usefulness of such redirects, which is a contributing factor to why I shan't be creating any more of them. - Bossanoven (talk) 23:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

It might be more use to consider what you create before you create, rather than after. Might be wise to request speedy delete as author on a lot of your creations. --Richhoncho (talk) 00:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree. I said it's ambiguous, as in it is not a good idea to pursue further exploits in this area. But I think that the redirects that I have created are good to have around. I'm not sure why you are so vehement about this topic, unless you merely mean to discourage future creations of this sort. - Bossanoven (talk) 02:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

I don't particularly care about the redirects, but I do think they are symptomatic of an editor who is not considering what they are doing and what they will achieve. If I have made you think about what you are doing it will save you many deletions of your contributions. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

My edit summaries

You told me to do better, how are the last bunch in my edit history. I think all my ES since your message have been ideal. Thanks, DangerousJXD (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

@DangerousJXD: Yes, they seem better now. However, please avoid slang like "j balls". Thanks. - Bossanoven (talk) 00:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

OK. Thanks, --DangerousJXD (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

training day

Hello,

I recently corrected a plot point for the movie Training Day, and you for some reason reverted it back to the incorrect plot. Here is the relevant quote from the movie, showing that the blood test is indeed going to show traces of PCP in his system, and doesn't need to be faked

Five proven, decorated officers
         say you were the shooter.
         Investigators are gonna pull a
         tube of your blood and test for
         intoxicants.  Remember all the
         P.C.P. you smoked today?

Category:Collaborations between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones

Category:Collaborations between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 09:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Rollbacker

I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Jeremy Lin

Please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive217#Jeremy Lin. GiantSnowman 10:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey

What an awesome user page! Coolest I've seen on Wikipedia. Now the reason I'm here: Why did you revert my edits to DeAndre Jordan and Stretch four? Ryan Anderson is a way better example of a stretch four than Josh Smith. Is there suppose to be a capital letter there? For the Shaun Bradley page you also reverted, I'd say strong defense is a better way to put it. You didn't really give a reason for your reverts either. Please ping me. -DangerousJXD (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Maybe I'm overreacting but do you have a problem with me or something? You seem annoyed at me. Am I misunderstanding you? I think you're active and you're not responding to my questions. Also you complained to me about my edit summaries but then you complained to Bagumba? That gay bullet point you have there I was refering to Rudy Gay. The first one was before you asked me to do better and the other one was only half of that edit summary, the rest said fixed typo. -DangerousJXD (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

@DangerousJXD: Yes, a capital letter belongs there. I'd say that 6'9" or taller is extremely tall. 7'7" is the tallest height in NBA history. Feel free to re-add your picture in. As for Bradley, I don't think it's POV to state that because the fact is that he was an outstanding player at that level at that point in time. I'll try to do a better job with my edit summaries to keep you informed. Regards, - Bossanoven (talk) 07:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

But why did you change the picture back then? -DangerousJXD (talk) 08:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

It was an honest mistake. - Bossanoven (talk) 08:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

OK then, and (sorry should have put this in the first reply) why does a capital belong there and 6'9 is not extremely tall in basketball I'd say 7'3 or more. I will ad that Anderson picture shortly. -DangerousJXD (talk) 08:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

It's a capital because the quotation refers to God. Do as you wish with the rest. Sorry for the inconvenience. - Bossanoven (talk) 08:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

You Might Think

Can you confirm where you obtained the issue number? Cheers. Thanks --Richhoncho (talk) 01:27, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

The Beatles UK singles

(Parlophone & Apple releases only)

Date	Title	Label & Cat. No.
5 Oct 1962	"Love Me Do" / "P.S. I Love You"	Parlophone R 4949
11 Jan 1963	"Please Please Me" / "Ask Me Why"	Parlophone R 4983
12 Apr 1963	"From Me to You" / "Thank You Girl"	Parlophone R 5015
23 Aug 1963	"She Loves You" / "I'll Get You"	Parlophone R 5055
29 Nov 1963	"I Want to Hold Your Hand" / "This Boy"	Parlophone R 5084
20 Mar 1964	"Can't Buy Me Love" / "You Can't Do That"	Parlophone R 5114
10 Jul 1964	"A Hard Day's Night" / "Things We Said Today"	Parlophone R 5160
27 Nov 1964	"I Feel Fine" / "She's a Woman"	Parlophone R 5200
9 Apr 1965	"Ticket to Ride" / "Yes It Is"	Parlophone R 5265
23 Jul 1965	"Help!" / "I'm Down"	Parlophone R 5305
3 Dec 1965	"Day Tripper" / "We Can Work It Out"	Parlophone R 5389
10 Jun 1966	"Paperback Writer" / "Rain"	Parlophone R 5452
5 Aug 1966	"Yellow Submarine" / "Eleanor Rigby"	Parlophone R 5493
17 Feb 1967	"Penny Lane" / "Strawberry Fields Forever"	Parlophone R 5570
6 Jul 1967	"All You Need Is Love" / "Baby, You're a Rich Man"	Parlophone R 5620
23 Nov 1967	"Hello, Goodbye" / "I Am the Walrus"	Parlophone R 5655
14 Mar 1968	"Lady Madonna" / "The Inner Light"	Parlophone R 5675
29 Aug 1968	"Hey Jude" / "Revolution"	Apple R 5722
17 Apr 1969	"Get Back" / "Don't Let Me Down"	Apple R 5777
29 May 1969	"The Ballad of John and Yoko" / "Old Brown Shoe"	Apple R 5786
2 Nov 1969	"Something" / "Come Together"	Apple R 5814
8 Mar 1970	"Let It Be" / "You Know My Name (Look Up the Number)"	Apple R 5833
7 Mar 1976	"Yesterday" / "I Should Have Known Better"	Parlophone R 6013
4 Jul 1976	"Back in the U.S.S.R." / "Twist and Shout"	Parlophone R 6016
1 Oct 1978	"Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band"/"With a Little Help from My Friends" / "A Day in the Life"	Parlophone R 6022
30 May 1982	"The Beatles Movie Medley" / "I'm Happy Just to Dance with You"	Parlophone R 6055
26 Mar 1995	"Baby It's You" / "I'll Follow the Sun" / "Devil in Her Heart" / "Boys"	Apple R 6406
10 Dec 1995	"Free as a Bird" / "Christmas Time (Is Here Again)"	Apple R 6422
10 Mar 1996	"Real Love" / "Baby's in Black"	Apple R 6425

Best, --Discographer (talk) 17:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Really?

I just asked to be left alone and you couldn't do that. I work well with others. Just because I think your a nuisance doesn't mean you need to go crying to administration. But whatever, I'll just do what I can with the time I have left, unlike some people.

It appears administration gave well thought judgement and is giving me a pass. Perhaps we may both learn from this in some shape or form. If you choose to cooperate with me in the future, be my guest for I have several projects I'll soon be undergoing. I'd be happy to elaborate further if your interested. If not, then best of luck to you in your future endeavors, hopefully they are positive. Peace

Suspected sockpuppet

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyrusThomas4lyf. Thank you. Observer2015 (talk) 09:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Hypocritical and ironic isn't it? I hope this example of uncollaborative behavior doesn't affect future projects I wished to include you in.

МЈ

What is the connection between MJ and Heat?--Bobik (talk) 07:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Uprising fist.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uprising fist.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 22:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Witnesses of the Porajmos

Category:Witnesses of the Porajmos, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BDD (talk) 13:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

John, Paul, George, 'n' Ringo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John, Paul, George, 'n' Ringo. Since you had some involvement with the John, Paul, George, 'n' Ringo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 15:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

John, Paul, George 'n' Ringo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John, Paul, George 'n' Ringo. Since you had some involvement with the John, Paul, George 'n' Ringo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 15:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

John, Paul, George, 'n Ringo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John, Paul, George, 'n Ringo. Since you had some involvement with the John, Paul, George, 'n Ringo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 15:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

John, Paul, George n' Ringo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John, Paul, George n' Ringo. Since you had some involvement with the John, Paul, George n' Ringo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 15:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

John, Paul, George, n' Ringo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John, Paul, George, n' Ringo. Since you had some involvement with the John, Paul, George, n' Ringo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 15:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

John, Paul, George, n Ringo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John, Paul, George, n Ringo. Since you had some involvement with the John, Paul, George, n Ringo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 15:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

John, Paul, George n Ringo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John, Paul, George n Ringo. Since you had some involvement with the John, Paul, George n Ringo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 15:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

John, Paul, George 'n Ringo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John, Paul, George 'n Ringo. Since you had some involvement with the John, Paul, George 'n Ringo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 15:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:The Dark Side of the Moon

Category:The Dark Side of the Moon, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of National Basketball Association single-postseason series scoring leaders for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of National Basketball Association single-postseason series scoring leaders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of National Basketball Association single-postseason series scoring leaders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Bagumba (talk) 23:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Six bagger listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Six bagger. Since you had some involvement with the Six bagger redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Theme from Platoon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Theme from Platoon. Since you had some involvement with the Theme from Platoon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Duncan, Tim listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Duncan, Tim. Since you had some involvement with the Duncan, Tim redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Twirly Pen (Speak ^up) 08:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Policewomen listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Policewomen. Since you had some involvement with the Policewomen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Höss, Rudolf.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Höss, Rudolf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of NBA league average height, weight, age and playing experience for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NBA league average height, weight, age and playing experience is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NBA league average height, weight, age and playing experience until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Rudolf Francis Ferdinand Hoess listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rudolf Francis Ferdinand Hoess. Since you had some involvement with the Rudolf Francis Ferdinand Hoess redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Ruth Elias

Hello, Bossanoven,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ruth Elias should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Elias .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Daniel kenneth (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Who's Next has been nominated for discussion

Category:Who's Next, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:Norwegian people who died in Dachau concentration camp has been nominated for discussion

Category:Norwegian people who died in Dachau concentration camp, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Kapp Putsch has been nominated for discussion

Category:Kapp Putsch, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

U.-K. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U.-K.. Since you had some involvement with the U.-K. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Aileen Wuornos has been nominated for discussion

Category:Aileen Wuornos, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

The K.G.B. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The K.G.B.. Since you had some involvement with the The K.G.B. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 21:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of C.J. Allen (entrepreneur) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C.J. Allen (entrepreneur) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.J. Allen (entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JesseRafe (talk) 22:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

@JesseRafe:Thanks, but you should really contact @Canuck writer: since they added the content. I didn't delete the history after a move. - Bossanoven (talk) 22:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Kolozsvár Ghetto inmates has been nominated for discussion

Category:Kolozsvár Ghetto inmates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Catrìona (talk) 12:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Kolozsvár Ghetto has been nominated for discussion

Category:Kolozsvár Ghetto, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 13:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:51, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Master of Reality

A tag has been placed on Template:Master of Reality requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --woodensuperman 11:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Paranoid (album)

A tag has been placed on Template:Paranoid (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --woodensuperman 11:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

השואה listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect השואה. Since you had some involvement with the השואה redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Abote2 (talk) 16:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LIU Brooklyn Blackbirds soccer

A tag has been placed on Category:LIU Brooklyn Blackbirds soccer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

"Béisbol" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Béisbol. Since you had some involvement with the Béisbol redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

"Basebol" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Basebol. Since you had some involvement with the Basebol redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

"Peter O'Donnell (disambigution)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Peter O'Donnell (disambigution) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Peter O'Donnell (disambigution) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:32, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:PaulRevere&theRaidersPromo.jpg

The file File:PaulRevere&theRaidersPromo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Hermann Julius Hoefle.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hermann Julius Hoefle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Bruno Streckenbach.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bruno Streckenbach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

• File:Schumann, Horst.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Nazis who committed suicide in Lüneburg has been nominated for merging

Category:Nazis who committed suicide in Lüneburg has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Nazis who committed suicide in Flensburg has been nominated for merging

Category:Nazis who committed suicide in Flensburg has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Nazis who committed suicide in Nuremberg has been nominated for merging

Category:Nazis who committed suicide in Nuremberg has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Nazis who committed suicide in Berlin has been nominated for merging

Category:Nazis who committed suicide in Berlin has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)