Talk:Anatomical position: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:08, 25 May 2003

There is already an article Terms for anatomical location which covers much the same subject and could be merged with this one. Any objections? (BTW, I like this one better because of its excellent style but the other one has dozens of links to it so it might be easier to move content from here to there) Cheers, Kosebamse 19:57 24 May 2003 (UTC)

No problem here...Thanks for the kind word. Note: I like cranial/rostral in the other article as opposed to my cephalic. KJ Sam 21:55 24 May 2003 (UTC)

I´ve spent an hour trying to integrate the content, but somehow it didn´t work. As the other article does not specifically refer to human anatomy, it might be best to leave it the way it is, and let this article deal specifically with human anatomy. It could perhaps be renamed "terms in human anatomy" or somethimg like that. Kosebamse

Revision as of 22:05, 24 May 2003 edit KJ Sam (talk \| contribs) 116 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:08, 25 May 2003 edit undo Kosebamse (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 5,826 edits answer to kjsam Next edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	No problem here...Thanks for the kind word. Note: I like cranial/rostral in the other article as opposed to my cephalic. [[User:KJ Sam\|KJ Sam]] 21:55 24 May 2003 (UTC)		No problem here...Thanks for the kind word. Note: I like cranial/rostral in the other article as opposed to my cephalic. [[User:KJ Sam\|KJ Sam]] 21:55 24 May 2003 (UTC)

			I´ve spent an hour trying to integrate the content, but somehow it didn´t work. As the other article does not specifically refer to human anatomy, it might be best to leave it the way it is, and let this article deal specifically with human anatomy. It could perhaps be renamed "terms in human anatomy" or somethimg like that. [[User:Kosebamse\|Kosebamse]]