User talk:Mark.malewski: Difference between revisions
→Warning: new section |
PLEASE LEAVE MY TALK PAGE ALONE - THANK-YOU! - FINAL STRIKE - MOVE THIS TO YOUR TALK PAGE - STAY OFF MY TALK PAGE |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Yeah, I believe it should be good! We can always add some additional “polish” later, but it’s fine! Thanks! [[User:Mark.malewski|Mark.malewski]] ([[User talk:Mark.malewski#top|talk]]) 21:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC) |
Yeah, I believe it should be good! We can always add some additional “polish” later, but it’s fine! Thanks! [[User:Mark.malewski|Mark.malewski]] ([[User talk:Mark.malewski#top|talk]]) 21:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Warning == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments again, as you did at [[:Talk:PCI Express]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. You seem to ignore every warning. I've lost count of the infractions you've made.<!-- Template:uw-tpv4im --> |
Revision as of 23:53, 2 June 2020
Aviation articles
You might find it easier to start with aclean template by using Template:WPAVIATION creator--Petebutt (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Wrong aircraft
Presumably all the Convair 116 bits will be eradicated?--Petebutt (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Convair Model 200
Hi Mark, are you finished with your major work on Draft:Convair Model 200? To my somewhat-experienced wiki-eyes, it looks good enough to go to mainspace as -is, but I wanted to see if you had anything left you needed to work on first. I'll give you a few days to respond, and the make my own decision if I don't hear back from you. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 22:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, I believe it should be good! We can always add some additional “polish” later, but it’s fine! Thanks! Mark.malewski (talk) 21:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)