Jump to content

User talk:MB: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 38: Line 38:


:{{u|MB}}
:{{u|MB}}
Oh right, thanks again, I thought that articles for creation and new page patrol would be the same thing. My mistake. Regards, [[User:Kip1234|Kip1234]] ([[User talk:Kip1234|talk]]) 22:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Oh right, but the article had already been reviewed and accepted [[User_talk:Kip1234|before]] (on the articles for creation: Winstanley Estate section). Is there a reason that it was reviewed twice?

Thanks again [[User:Kip1234|Kip1234]] ([[User talk:Kip1234|talk]]) 22:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:45, 11 June 2020

Mariam Tillyaeva

Hello, I saw you nominated the page for deletion. Could you possibly suggest more information on the reasoning

Your GA nomination of Jedediah Sanger

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jedediah Sanger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cavie78 -- Cavie78 (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jedediah Sanger

The article Jedediah Sanger you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jedediah Sanger for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cavie78 -- Cavie78 (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello! Thank you for tidying up the talk page for Blue Creek (Belize). I am new to Wikipedia and really appreciate your help, as I was unaware of the location mistake I had made. Grace Tarbuck (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Tennent III

On 29 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Tennent III, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American-colonial minister William Tennent III was known as the "Firebrand Parson" due to his strong support of religious and civil liberty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Tennent III. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William Tennent III), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jedediah Sanger

The article Jedediah Sanger you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jedediah Sanger for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cavie78 -- Cavie78 (talk) 20:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Winstanley Estate Review Outcome?

Hi, I apologise if this comes across as harassment (which it definitely is not intended as) and only want to ask you a couple of questions based on your "review" of the oage Winstanley Estate. It's been a couple of days now, but I had a notification that the page had been "reviewed". Were you reviewing it because I had nominated it for a Good Article? Or was it something else- if so would you mind telling me what it was for? If it was for a good article or another topic was there an outcome for that review/any improvements that could be made to the page? I'm only asking these questions because it was a bit unclear from the initial notification.

Thanks, Kip1234 (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kip1234, I reviewed it to accept is as a new article into the encyclopedia. Most new articles need to be reviewed (there are currently about 10,000) in the queue. If it didn't meet minimum requirements, it would have been moved to Draft space, nominated for deletion, etc. You can see WP:NPP for more info. MB 22:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
MB

Oh right, thanks again, I thought that articles for creation and new page patrol would be the same thing. My mistake. Regards, Kip1234 (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]