Talk:David Haas: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
The allegations were not revealed by SNAP, they were revealed by IntoAccount, and re-posted by SNAP. There is also no mention of the "grooming of teenage girls" in the allegations. At the very least, your edit would need to be reworked to be consistent with the source you are citing. [[User:Macserv|Macserv]] ([[User talk:Macserv|talk]]) 21:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC) |
The allegations were not revealed by SNAP, they were revealed by IntoAccount, and re-posted by SNAP. There is also no mention of the "grooming of teenage girls" in the allegations. At the very least, your edit would need to be reworked to be consistent with the source you are citing. [[User:Macserv|Macserv]] ([[User talk:Macserv|talk]]) 21:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC) |
||
David, from the cited material "The youngest victim reported to us was nineteen years old at the time of the alleged sexual battery, while Haas was over fifty.” " The last time I checked a nineTEEN year old was still a teenager. You need to stop trying to edit your way out of trouble. I also posted another news citation about this. [[Special:Contributions/2600:6C44:257F:7C04:E809:F972:DF:A668|2600:6C44:257F:7C04:E809:F972:DF:A668]] ([[User talk:2600:6C44:257F:7C04:E809:F972:DF:A668|talk]]) 00:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:09, 14 June 2020
Biography: Musicians Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Fix Links
The 2 adjacent links "St Louis" and "Jesuits" toward the end of the article should be changed to a single link to the article "St Louis Jesuits", as the context makes clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.156.155 (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Sexual Assault
https://www.snapnetwork.org/solidarity_into_account_survivors_david_haas_jun20
This is an absolutely trustworthy source. It is not vandalism.
The allegations are unproven. The cited document does not establish the veracity of the allegations; rather, it contains multiple statements known to be erroneous and/or inaccurate. The facts are that there is no criminal complaint, and there is no investigation in progress. At this point, this is digital vigilantism, and legal recourse is being evaluated. That said, if these allegations are proven true, this section should be restored. Macserv (talk) 19:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Are you going to call the internet police on me Dave for posting cited statements on your Wikipedia page?
The allegations were not revealed by SNAP, they were revealed by IntoAccount, and re-posted by SNAP. There is also no mention of the "grooming of teenage girls" in the allegations. At the very least, your edit would need to be reworked to be consistent with the source you are citing. Macserv (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
David, from the cited material "The youngest victim reported to us was nineteen years old at the time of the alleged sexual battery, while Haas was over fifty.” " The last time I checked a nineTEEN year old was still a teenager. You need to stop trying to edit your way out of trouble. I also posted another news citation about this. 2600:6C44:257F:7C04:E809:F972:DF:A668 (talk) 00:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)