Talk:The Secret Life of Pets 2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:50, 14 June 2020

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Animation: American C‑class Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Comedy C‑class Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: American / Animated C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Cinema C‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Character

What could be harrison ford take a voice of any character?? Aldiagung (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message to everyone who thinks this movie will underperform at the box office

I’ve heard several people on the Internet say that this movie will underperform at the box office compared to the first movie (which made $104 million opening weekend and $368 million total. Frankly, I don’t think those people know what they’re talking about. Sure, this movie has some competition for family audiences this summer (Toy Story 4, The Lion King, Aladdin, etc), but I don’t think any of those movies will greatly affect this one. This is Illumination we’re talking about here! They always make a lot of money off their movies. MY PREDICTION: Opening Weekend: $125 million (most animated sequels make more money than the first movie) Total: $400 million

Talk pages are meant to discuss possible improvements to the article, they are not a comment section. If you want to share your opinion of box office predictions for this film, social media or personal blogs are better suited for that, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. -Gouleg (Talk • Contribs) 17:05, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the final poster?

Hello, is there any reason why I didn't see the final poster of this movie today? I am so worried.

The Secret Life of Pets 2 (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Secret Life of Pets 2 (upcoming film). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 13:26, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Secret Life of Pets 3

Have you guys heard about a possible third Secret Life of Pets movie? look up on cinemablend and see. -Dinonick90 (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CRYSTAL and try to avoid speculation. Actors are unlikely to say bad things before a film has been released. Actors are often tied into multi-film contracts and are still unlikely to say bad things even after a film bombs. This should probably not have been added to the article. This film looked like it did well so a sequel or spin-off does seem likely but until they announce that they have gone into production I don't think it is appropriate to add anything. Again please try to avoid speculation, this is still supposed to be an encyclopedia. -- 109.78.244.23 (talk) 04:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sequel

I've removed the "Sequel" section, and I probably shouldn't have even tried to rewrite the misguided speculation in the first place. It was only comments from actors right in the middle of promoting the film saying they'd prefer not to be unemployed. There is no film in development.

Any section labelled "Possible sequel" should really be removed on sight, because WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL WP:NOTFUTURE WP:NOTRUMOR WP:NOTSPECULATION. -- 109.79.86.113 (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Remove again.[1] This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, of course actors are going to say they would like to work on the film again when they are right in the middle of promoting it. If the writers or the director or the producers had something to say about a sequel that might be worth including but these comments from the actors are not meaningful or significant. -- 109.76.195.183 (talk) 20:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:22, 9 January 2020 edit Apokryltaros (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 79,902 edits Reverted to revision 915533437 by 109.79.86.113 (talk): Please make an actionable request (TW) Tag: Undo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:50, 14 June 2020 edit undo 109.76.195.183 (talk) →The Secret Life of Pets 3 Next edit →
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Any section labelled "Possible sequel" should really be removed on sight, because [[WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL]] [[WP:NOTFUTURE]] [[WP:NOTRUMOR]] [[WP:NOTSPECULATION]]. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.79.86.113\|109.79.86.113]] ([[User talk:109.79.86.113\|talk]]) 20:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)		Any section labelled "Possible sequel" should really be removed on sight, because [[WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL]] [[WP:NOTFUTURE]] [[WP:NOTRUMOR]] [[WP:NOTSPECULATION]]. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.79.86.113\|109.79.86.113]] ([[User talk:109.79.86.113\|talk]]) 20:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
			: Remove again.[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=The_Secret_Life_of_Pets_2&diff=962571194&oldid=962525875] This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, of course actors are going to say they would like to work on the film again when they are right in the middle of promoting it. If the writers or the director or the producers had something to say about a sequel that might be worth including but these comments from the actors are not meaningful or significant. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.76.195.183\|109.76.195.183]] ([[User talk:109.76.195.183\|talk]]) 20:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)