Jump to content

Butch and Sundance: The Early Days: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
-Category:1970s action films; ± 2 categories using HotCat
m minor fixes, replaced: ," → ", , <ref name="grant">'Sundance': Meanwhile, Back at the Ranch... Lee, Grant. ''Los Angeles Times'' (1923-Current File) (Los Angeles) 23 Apr 1978: m40.</ref><ref>The 'Hyphenate' Is Television's Latest Breed of Mog
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|1979 Western film directed by Richard Lester}}
{{short description|1979 Western film directed by Richard Lester}}
{{refimprove|date=September 2016}}
{{more citations needed|date=September 2016}}
{{Infobox film
{{Infobox film
| name = Butch and Sundance: The Early Days
| name = Butch and Sundance: The Early Days
Line 53: Line 53:


==Production==
==Production==
Allan Burns worked on the script with [[William Goldman]], who was on board as executive producer; Goldman added some scenes and moments he wanted to introduce in the first movie but the bulk of the script was Burns'.<ref name="grant">'Sundance': Meanwhile, Back at the Ranch... Lee, Grant. ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' (1923-Current File) (Los Angeles) 23 Apr 1978: m40.</ref><ref>The 'Hyphenate' Is Television's Latest Breed of Mogul: The 'Hyphenates' By Bill Davidson. ''[[The New York Times]]'' (1923-Current file) (New York City) 29 May 1977: 47.</ref>
Allan Burns worked on the script with [[William Goldman]], who was on board as executive producer; Goldman added some scenes and moments he wanted to introduce in the first movie but the bulk of the script was Burns'.<ref name="grant">{{Cite news|title='Sundance': Meanwhile, Back at the Ranch|author=Lee, Grant|work=[[Los Angeles Times]]|date=Apr 23, 1978|page=m40}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=The 'Hyphenate' Is Television's Latest Breed of Mogul: The 'Hyphenates'|author=Bill Davidson|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=May 29, 1977|page=47}}</ref>|author=William Katt had recently made ''[[First Love (1977 film)|First Love]]'' and was being called "a young Robert Redford" so ended up being cast as Sundance. Tom Berenger was cast after the studio were impressed by his performance in ''[[Looking for Mr. Goodbar (film)|Looking for Mr Goodbar]]''.<ref>{{cite news|title=FILM CLIPS: DYAN CANNON'S SHOOTING STAR|author=Kilday, Gregg|date=Nov 16, 1977|work=Los Angeles Times|page=g19}}</ref>


⚫
[[Jeff Corey]], portraying Sheriff Bledsoe, was the only actor to reprise his role from the original 1969 film.
William Katt had recently made ''[[First Love (1977 film)|First Love]]'' and was being called "a young Robert Redford" so ended up being cast as Sundance. Tom Berenger was cast after the studio were impressed by his performance in ''[[Looking for Mr. Goodbar (film)|Looking for Mr Goodbar]]''.<ref>FILM CLIPS: DYAN CANNON'S SHOOTING STAR Kilday, Gregg. ''Los Angeles Times'' (1923-Current File) (Los Angeles) 16 Nov 1977: g19.</ref>

⚫
[[Jeff Corey]], portraying Sheriff Bledsoe, was the only actor to reprise his role from the original 1969 film.


Director Richard Lester stated he had never seen the first movie.<ref name="grant"/>
Director Richard Lester stated he had never seen the first movie.<ref name="grant"/>
Line 63: Line 61:
==Reception==
==Reception==
===Critical response===
===Critical response===
[[Roger Ebert]] gave the film 2.5 stars out of 4 and said it was "technically fine ... But as we listen to the freewheeling dialog, as we watch young Butch and the Kid blunder through their first adventures and finesse their later ones, there's a nagging question bouncing about in the backs of our heads: Why are we in this theater at this time? Did we want to know about the early days? Now that we're here, does the movie make us care? Not really."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/butch-and-sundance-the-early-days-1969 |title=Butch and Sundance: The Early Days |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=June 18, 1979 |website=[[RogerEbert.com]] |accessdate=April 22, 2019 }}</ref> [[Gene Siskel]] of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' also gave it 2.5 stars, writing that "Fox succeeded in getting the actors but failed to provide them with a really fine script. Which is not to say that 'Butch and Sundance: The Early Days' is a bad picture. On the contrary, it's pleasant enough, but that's about all."<ref>Siskel, Gene (June 20, 1979). "Butch, Sundance 'prequel' is too cute to cut it". ''[[Chicago Tribune]]''. Section 3, p. 7.</ref> [[Vincent Canby]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' called the film "so lifeless it's almost creepy ... You can't believe that Mr. Lester was in the same continent when it was made." Of the two leads Canby said, "There's nothing remarkably wrong about their performances but, for one reason or another, there's absolutely no rapport between them."<ref>Canby, Vincent (June 15, 1979). "Film: 'Butch and Sundance' Goes Off the Trail". ''[[The New York Times]]''. C10.</ref>
[[Roger Ebert]] gave the film 2.5 stars out of 4 and said it was "technically fine ... But as we listen to the freewheeling dialog, as we watch young Butch and the Kid blunder through their first adventures and finesse their later ones, there's a nagging question bouncing about in the backs of our heads: Why are we in this theater at this time? Did we want to know about the early days? Now that we're here, does the movie make us care? Not really."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/butch-and-sundance-the-early-days-1969 |title=Butch and Sundance: The Early Days |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=June 18, 1979 |website=[[RogerEbert.com]] |accessdate=April 22, 2019 }}</ref> [[Gene Siskel]] of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' also gave it 2.5 stars, writing that "Fox succeeded in getting the actors but failed to provide them with a really fine script. Which is not to say that 'Butch and Sundance: The Early Days' is a bad picture. On the contrary, it's pleasant enough, but that's about all."<ref>{{cite news|author=Siskel, Gene|date=June 20, 1979|title=Butch, Sundance 'prequel' is too cute to cut it|work=[[Chicago Tribune]]|department=Section 3|page=7}}</ref> [[Vincent Canby]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' called the film "so lifeless it's almost creepy ... You can't believe that Mr. Lester was in the same continent when it was made." Of the two leads Canby said, "There's nothing remarkably wrong about their performances but, for one reason or another, there's absolutely no rapport between them."<ref>{{cite news|author=Canby, Vincent|date=June 15, 1979|title=Film: 'Butch and Sundance' Goes Off the Trail|work=[[The New York Times]]|page=C10}}</ref>


''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' wrote, "Tom Berenger and William Katt acquit themselves admirably, but simply can't compete with the ghosts of two superstars ... There are some patented Lester hijinks in the first half-hour of the prequel, but these peter out surprisingly soon. What's left is a mishmash of effective stuntwork and visuals, and a story line that moseys along with little suspense or excitement."<ref>"Film Reviews: Butch and Sundance". ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]''. June 6, 1979. 20.</ref> [[Kevin Thomas (film critic)|Kevin Thomas]] of the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' called the film "pleasant though slight."<ref>Thomas, Kevin (June 15, 1979). "A Prequel to Butch, Sundance". ''[[Los Angeles Times]]''. Part IV, p. 1.</ref> Gary Arnold of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' declared it "the first attractive Western to mosey across the screen in several years. Not a great or even rousing Western, but at least a pleasant, warmly evocative one, beautifully visualized and incidentally enjoyable for its settings, texture, droll tone and sometimes amusing interplay of characters."<ref>Arnold, Gary (June 15, 1979). "Two for the Comeback Trail". ''[[The Washington Post]]''. B1.</ref>
''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' wrote, "Tom Berenger and William Katt acquit themselves admirably, but simply can't compete with the ghosts of two superstars ... There are some patented Lester hijinks in the first half-hour of the prequel, but these peter out surprisingly soon. What's left is a mishmash of effective stuntwork and visuals, and a story line that moseys along with little suspense or excitement."<ref>"Film Reviews: Butch and Sundance". ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]''. June 6, 1979. 20.</ref> [[Kevin Thomas (film critic)|Kevin Thomas]] of the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' called the film "pleasant though slight."<ref>{{cite news|author=Thomas, Kevin|date=June 15, 1979|title=A Prequel to Butch, Sundance|work=[[Los Angeles Times]]|department=Part IV|page= 1}}.</ref> Gary Arnold of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' declared it "the first attractive Western to mosey across the screen in several years. Not a great or even rousing Western, but at least a pleasant, warmly evocative one, beautifully visualized and incidentally enjoyable for its settings, texture, droll tone and sometimes amusing interplay of characters."<ref>{{cite news|author=Arnold, Gary|date=June 15, 1979|title=Two for the Comeback Trail|work=[[The Washington Post]]|page=B1}}</ref>


The film reportedly lost $4 million. "It was a terrible movie," said a retired Fox executive. "It was a parody of a satire and it was filmed by talentless people. Naturally it bombed.... It takes a lot of money to produce a western. It has to be shot on location. You need horses, a period town, costumes and other paraphernalia that a contemporary film such as '[[Kramer vs. Kramer]]' doesn't require. That's why studios are reluctant to finance them." <ref>WHY THEY'RE SLOW ON THE DRAW Michael Blowen Boston Globe 29 June 1980: 1. </ref>
The film reportedly lost $4 million. "It was a terrible movie", said a retired Fox executive. "It was a parody of a satire and it was filmed by talentless people. Naturally it bombed.... It takes a lot of money to produce a western. It has to be shot on location. You need horses, a period town, costumes and other paraphernalia that a contemporary film such as '[[Kramer vs. Kramer]]' doesn't require. That's why studios are reluctant to finance them." <ref>{{cite news|title=WHY THEY'RE SLOW ON THE DRAW|author=Michael Blowen|work=Boston Globe|date=29 June 1980|page=1}}</ref>


==Release==
==Release==
Line 82: Line 80:
==External links==
==External links==
*{{IMDb title|0078919}}
*{{IMDb title|0078919}}
*{{amg title|7671}}
*{{AllMovie title|7671}}
*{{rotten tomatoes|butch_and_sundance_the_early_days}}
*{{Rotten Tomatoes|butch_and_sundance_the_early_days}}


{{Richard Lester}}
{{Richard Lester}}

Revision as of 10:43, 27 June 2020

Butch and Sundance: The Early Days
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRichard Lester
Written byAllan Burns
Produced bySteven Bach
Jack B. Bernstein
William Goldman
Gabriel Katzka
StarringWilliam Katt
Tom Berenger
CinematographyLászló Kovács
Edited byGeorge Trirogoff
Music byPatrick Williams
Production
companies
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Release date
June 15, 1979
Running time
111 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$9 million[1]
Box office$5,136,913[2]

Butch and Sundance: The Early Days is a 1979 Western film and prequel to the 1969 film Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. It stars Tom Berenger as Butch Cassidy and William Katt as the Sundance Kid, with Jeff Corey reprising his role as Sheriff Bledsoe.

It was directed by Richard Lester and written by Allan Burns. It generally received mixed reviews but was nominated for an Oscar for Best Costume Design.[3]

Plot

In Wyoming, wannabe outlaw Butch Cassidy joins forces with sharpshooter Harry Longabaugh (who renames himself the Sundance Kid) and they carry out a series of robberies. However, Butch is stalked by a member of his former gang, O.C. Hanks, who believes he betrayed the gang. The two spend the winter in Telluride until they hear O.C. is in town, then rush away to deliver diphtheria serum to snowbound farms and become heroes. O.C. ambushes them and wounds Sundance by mistake. He recovers in Butch's home, tended by Butch's wife Mary and their two sons, who don't know their father's real job (he takes up butchery to earn money). O.C. turns up for a showdown and Sundance unintentionally kills him. Returning to crime, the pair rob a bank and then decide to rob a money train guarded by cavalry, not knowing Butch has been promised an amnesty if he gives up crime. They get the money, free the cavalry horses to prevent pursuit, and ride away dreaming of being famous outlaws.

Cast

Production

Allan Burns worked on the script with William Goldman, who was on board as executive producer; Goldman added some scenes and moments he wanted to introduce in the first movie but the bulk of the script was Burns'.[4][5]|author=William Katt had recently made First Love and was being called "a young Robert Redford" so ended up being cast as Sundance. Tom Berenger was cast after the studio were impressed by his performance in Looking for Mr Goodbar.[6]

Jeff Corey, portraying Sheriff Bledsoe, was the only actor to reprise his role from the original 1969 film.

Director Richard Lester stated he had never seen the first movie.[4]

Reception

Critical response

Roger Ebert gave the film 2.5 stars out of 4 and said it was "technically fine ... But as we listen to the freewheeling dialog, as we watch young Butch and the Kid blunder through their first adventures and finesse their later ones, there's a nagging question bouncing about in the backs of our heads: Why are we in this theater at this time? Did we want to know about the early days? Now that we're here, does the movie make us care? Not really."[7] Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune also gave it 2.5 stars, writing that "Fox succeeded in getting the actors but failed to provide them with a really fine script. Which is not to say that 'Butch and Sundance: The Early Days' is a bad picture. On the contrary, it's pleasant enough, but that's about all."[8] Vincent Canby of The New York Times called the film "so lifeless it's almost creepy ... You can't believe that Mr. Lester was in the same continent when it was made." Of the two leads Canby said, "There's nothing remarkably wrong about their performances but, for one reason or another, there's absolutely no rapport between them."[9]

Variety wrote, "Tom Berenger and William Katt acquit themselves admirably, but simply can't compete with the ghosts of two superstars ... There are some patented Lester hijinks in the first half-hour of the prequel, but these peter out surprisingly soon. What's left is a mishmash of effective stuntwork and visuals, and a story line that moseys along with little suspense or excitement."[10] Kevin Thomas of the Los Angeles Times called the film "pleasant though slight."[11] Gary Arnold of The Washington Post declared it "the first attractive Western to mosey across the screen in several years. Not a great or even rousing Western, but at least a pleasant, warmly evocative one, beautifully visualized and incidentally enjoyable for its settings, texture, droll tone and sometimes amusing interplay of characters."[12]

The film reportedly lost $4 million. "It was a terrible movie", said a retired Fox executive. "It was a parody of a satire and it was filmed by talentless people. Naturally it bombed.... It takes a lot of money to produce a western. It has to be shot on location. You need horses, a period town, costumes and other paraphernalia that a contemporary film such as 'Kramer vs. Kramer' doesn't require. That's why studios are reluctant to finance them." [13]

Release

A DVD of the film was released by Anchor Bay Entertainment in February 2005. However, Anchor Bay has since lost distribution rights to the film and the DVD was forced to go out of print.[citation needed]

Shout! Factory acquired the rights to the film and released it on DVD as a double billing with Death Hunt on February 1, 2011.[citation needed]

It is currently available on BLU-RAY through Timeless Media Group.[citation needed]

References

  1. ^ Solomon, Aubrey (1989). Twentieth Century Fox: A Corporate and Financial History. Scarecrow Press. p. 259.
  2. ^ "Butch and Sundance: The Early Days". Box Office Mojo.
  3. ^ "Academy Awards". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2010-09-09.
  4. ^ a b Lee, Grant (Apr 23, 1978). "'Sundance': Meanwhile, Back at the Ranch". Los Angeles Times. p. m40.
  5. ^ Bill Davidson (May 29, 1977). "The 'Hyphenate' Is Television's Latest Breed of Mogul: The 'Hyphenates'". The New York Times. p. 47.
  6. ^ Kilday, Gregg (Nov 16, 1977). "FILM CLIPS: DYAN CANNON'S SHOOTING STAR". Los Angeles Times. p. g19.
  7. ^ Ebert, Roger (June 18, 1979). "Butch and Sundance: The Early Days". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  8. ^ Siskel, Gene (June 20, 1979). "Butch, Sundance 'prequel' is too cute to cut it". Section 3. Chicago Tribune. p. 7.
  9. ^ Canby, Vincent (June 15, 1979). "Film: 'Butch and Sundance' Goes Off the Trail". The New York Times. p. C10.
  10. ^ "Film Reviews: Butch and Sundance". Variety. June 6, 1979. 20.
  11. ^ Thomas, Kevin (June 15, 1979). "A Prequel to Butch, Sundance". Part IV. Los Angeles Times. p. 1..
  12. ^ Arnold, Gary (June 15, 1979). "Two for the Comeback Trail". The Washington Post. p. B1.
  13. ^ Michael Blowen (29 June 1980). "WHY THEY'RE SLOW ON THE DRAW". Boston Globe. p. 1.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Butch_and_Sundance:_The_Early_Days&oldid=964750928"