Talk:Fels-Naptha: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:34, 29 June 2020

Brands Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Does the name come from Naphtha?

Or feldspar? That's what I've sometimes suspected, although neither spelling is correct. Asat (talk) 02:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Health Considerations" section seems relatively pointless

Of the two items it contains, one seems to be there only to state that it is no longer a health consideration, but used to be ("Outdated Health Considerations" section?) the other is referencing an MSDS... although the statement is accurate, it would make more sense if the section was titled "Health Considerations for Manufacturers". Just for fun, the MSDS for water http://www.flinnsci.com/Documents/MSDS/WXYZ/Water.pdf , with such gems as:

SECTION 4 — FIRST AID MEASURES Call a physician and seek medical attention for further treatment, observation, and support after first aid.

and

SECTION 12 — ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION Data not yet available.

MSDS data generally exists for the purpose of Oh Christ, a 400 ton container of Fels-Naptha just exploded all over the highway, what do I need to know about it right now so I don't make this situation worse and not Oh here is some laundry soap in bar form that behaves like every other soap I've used in my entire life which is what normal people are thinking about when they look up health considerations.

I was tempted to delete the section and fold relevant bits into others, but then I realized I could type at least twice as much on the Talk page first and avoid any possible hurt feelings or confusion on the part of all of those millions upon millions of people who rely on this article about a specific brand of bar soap for all of their needs (oh god, should I eat it, what should I do with it? what if I have one from 70 years ago lying around, is THAT one safe to eat?).

SlipperyDongDumpster (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fels-Naptha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130509020307/http://www.soapsgonebuy.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=D1001&Show=ExtInfo to http://www.soapsgonebuy.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=D1001&Show=ExtInfo

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trade Mark

There is a legal doctrine called the "Trade Mark exception" that allows a product which has long been known by a common name to have as a trademarked brand a term or phrase which implies the product contains substances or has qualities that it truly does not without this being considered to be a from of false advertising. Examples are "Coca-Cola", which has not contained cocaine in well over a century, "Chock Full o' Nuts" coffee, which has never actually contained nuts, and "Grape-Nuts" cereal, which contains no grapes nor nuts nor even any ingredients derived from them. Fels-Naptha Soap is now in the category of product, and this needs to be referenced in the article somehow, I believe. 72.106.155.46 (talk) 04:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:34, 29 June 2020 edit 72.106.155.46 (talk) →Trade Mark: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:34, 29 June 2020 edit undo 72.106.155.46 (talk) →Trade Mark Next edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:
	== Trade Mark ==		== Trade Mark ==

	There is a legal doctrine called the "Trade Mark exception" that allows a product which has long been known by a common name to have as a trademarked brand a term or phrase which implies the product contains substances or has qualities that it truly does not without this being considered to be a from of false advertising. Examples are "[[Coca-Cola]]", which has not contained [[cocaine]] in well over a century, "[[Chock Full o' Nuts]]" coffee, which has never actually contained nuts, and ''[[Grape Nuts]]'' cereal, which contains no grapes nor nuts nor even any ingredients derived from them. Fels-Naptha Soap is now in the category of product, and this needs to be referenced in the article somehow, I believe. [[Special:Contributions/72.106.155.46\|72.106.155.46]] ([[User talk:72.106.155.46\|talk]]) 04:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)		There is a legal doctrine called the "Trade Mark exception" that allows a product which has long been known by a common name to have as a trademarked brand a term or phrase which implies the product contains substances or has qualities that it truly does not without this being considered to be a from of false advertising. Examples are "[[Coca-Cola]]", which has not contained [[cocaine]] in well over a century, "[[Chock Full o' Nuts]]" coffee, which has never actually contained nuts, and "[[Grape-Nuts]]" cereal, which contains no grapes nor nuts nor even any ingredients derived from them. Fels-Naptha Soap is now in the category of product, and this needs to be referenced in the article somehow, I believe. [[Special:Contributions/72.106.155.46\|72.106.155.46]] ([[User talk:72.106.155.46\|talk]]) 04:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)