User talk:Praxidicae: Difference between revisions
→We are a conversation (film): deleted copyright violation |
→A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message Tag: wikilove |
||
Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
:None of your references confer notability. Also please don't assume everyone on Wikipedia is a "sir." Refer to people by their usesrnames. You can read a detailed explanation in the deletion nomination. [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] ([[User talk:Praxidicae#top|talk]]) 12:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC) |
:None of your references confer notability. Also please don't assume everyone on Wikipedia is a "sir." Refer to people by their usesrnames. You can read a detailed explanation in the deletion nomination. [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] ([[User talk:Praxidicae#top|talk]]) 12:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Also, please don't create articles by copypasting from IMDB. You must use your own words. I have deleted to article as a copyright violation. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 12:57, 4 July 2020 (UTC). |
:Also, please don't create articles by copypasting from IMDB. You must use your own words. I have deleted to article as a copyright violation. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 12:57, 4 July 2020 (UTC). |
||
== A barnstar for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Original Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Good job done. Thanks for the guidance. [[User:Kaushikvijay21|Vijay Kaushik]] ([[User talk:Kaushikvijay21|talk]]) 15:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 15:03, 4 July 2020
This is Praxidicae's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Trying to restore a page that you marked for speedy deletion
Hi, i am trying to restore a page that you marked for speedy deletion. The page name "dispatch News Desk' is a well-known news agency of Pakistan and it has been tweeted or praised by different political leaders including Imran Khan (Prime Minister of Pakistan) I think that its worthy to be included on Wikipedia just like other news publications of Pakistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aghaasadharoon (talk • contribs) 09:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello
I think you might have moved Sonia Sharma to draftspace while i was editing it, so it seemed like i recreated it, i was also thinking of moving it to draft space, do you think i should request speedy deletion? Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Already done Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
17:29, 24 June 2020
I'm not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits on the page I'm editing (Fausto J Pinto). I edited a few publications and I got spammed. I tried to reverse the changes I had made but those publications always get removed. Can I please reverse the editing without everything get removed? @ACFGaspar— Preceding unsigned comment added by ACFGaspar (talk • contribs)
- Answered at my talkpage. @ACFGaspar: Please don't ask the same question on multiple places and Sign your posts. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
Thank you for defending me on my talk page! It makes being a newbie a lot easier! P,TO 19104 (talk) (contributions) 19:48, 24 June 2020 (UTC) |
Hamilton Crossing Yard
May of sent this wrong help? Please trying to undelete this page thanks. Theaterofdreams2008 (talk) 14:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Inquire about the draft
Good evening, I now have two articles, which is a draft. How and when do you become an article about a personality and a phenomenon for everyone? With Regards. Ali.jamal3 (talk) 17:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
User suspiciously keen on deleting articles
Hi Praxidicae, you seem very keen on deleting articles, you have also written that I am paid to edit which I am not additionally I have specified this in the past. After looking at your talk page I have also noticed some others have had articles deleted thanks to you. You don't leave a very clear reason why the article is deleted and you rebuke the article in an area of field that you seemingly have little to no knowledge or experience with. All of that and your user page is political. These things ad up to a quite suspicious gut feeling which I'm sure some will be familiar with. Please move the article back before further consequences shall come from this dispute. Eratomsen454 (talk) 13:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Eratomsen454, Per a portion of your comment above which reads you rebuke the article in an area of field that you seemingly have little to no knowledge or experience with, that’s inconsequential, all Praxidicae needs to know are policies and guidelines governing this collaborative project (which they are very knowledgeable about) hence that comment is totally irrelevant. Also which bs “consequences” are you referring to? Celestina007 (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Eratomsen454 what exactly are you finding suspicious and what consequences are you referring to? And while we're at it, can you please explain your connection to Winkler and how you came to be the copyright holder of this photo which you've claimed as your own work? Praxidicae (talk) 13:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Eratomsen454 Also, remember we assume good faith here...you seem to be skipping over that. -- Dane talk 13:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
You can read about who I am and my field of expertise at my user page, it explains itself. I uploaded this photo to wiki commons to use in the article about Winkler. It comes from his website https://winklerviolin.com/ I have had articles denied many times, yet I always look at the user's page, just to be on the safe side. When I find a user whose user page does not even talk about experience or knowledge but purely shows something political (which wiki clearly states is against guidelines ) I become curious. When I thereafter go to the user's talk and I see that many others have unjustifiably had their articles removed it makes me interested. In regard to the consequences I am sure, you know that wiki users may have to be investigated by administrators. I am not interested in getting into finger-pointing competitions, let us settle this dispute.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eratomsen454 (talk • contribs)
- Eratomsen454 You know very little about Wikipedia based on your comments here. You claimed the photo was your own work, which is untrue, so why am I to believe what you say now? Aside from that, we have strict copyright policies. Read them. If you dislike my userpage, don't look at it. And per your own words
justifiably deleted
, well, if you have an issue with justified deletions, Wikipedia isn't going to be fun for you. We have specific sourcing and inclusion criteria. We don't have articles on everything that has ever existed. That's what blogs and google are for. If you intend on initiating an "investigation by admin", go to WP:ANI and make your case. Praxidicae (talk) 14:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC) - Also if you think saying "Black lives matter" is political, kindly see yourself off my talk page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
If I have claimed that the picture was mine I admit I have made a mistake I will certainly change that, no one is perfect I think we all make a typo like mistakes. Again the deletion was not particularly justified (An explanation was what i was poking around after.) Additionally, I will certainly not make the mistake of engaging in political discourse upon internet platforms.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eratomsen454 (talk • contribs)
- Eratomsen454 please WP:SIGN your edits. Further, I never deleted anything. I don't even have that capability. I did move it to draft space because it was inappropriate for mainspace and does not demonstrate notability nor does it contain reliable sources. Read WP:BLP. Praxidicae (talk) 14:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Administrator note Eratomsen454, Praxidicae is more than qualified to move an article into draft space. If you wish to see that action reversed, have that draft reviewed accordingly. El_C 14:27, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Is it possible for you to move the article back? Eratomsen454 (talk) 14:43, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Eratomsen454 Go through the review process as El C told you above. Praxidicae (talk) 14:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Eratomsen454, yes I could do it, but I won't. I trust Praxidicae's judgment. El_C 14:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Administrator note Eratomsen454, nobody is going to move it back to article space as long as it is full of unreliable sources such as Wordpress. Please see my post on your page. Bishonen | tålk 14:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC).
Thanks for your recommendations
I have added many reliable sources to draft:Gyarvi Sharif would it be possible to publish in mainspace at this time?Majun e Baqi (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Regarding this edit of yours, I agree with what you're saying, but the way you said it was WP:UNCIVIL. I draw your attention to WP:VPP#RfC: Make Biting Newcomers A Blockable Offense. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- You're drawing my attention to a largely opposed and thus far, unaccepted RFC? Praxidicae (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Even (loosely) intimating that there could be a block for that comment is something I strongly disagree about. Sure, it could be toned down, but it's not especially egregious, either. El_C 17:12, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- I would love to see your reasoning for even suggesting a block and what you expect it would achieve, per WP:ADMINACCT. Go on @RoySmith:, humour me. Nick (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- I did not intend to imply that this approached the threshold for a block (although I can certainly see why it was mis-interpreted that way, for which I apologize). But, I do think the comment was uncivil, and bitey, and that's the point I was trying to make. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Hey there, Praxidicae. I don't mean to press you; just letting you know in case you missed it. إيان (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- إيان Just as a note, I do not respond to emails from individuals I do not know or are not functionaries. Anything that need to be said should be done on Wikipedia. Praxidicae (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Praxidicae, I understand. Thanks for clarifying. إيان (talk) 14:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Moves to draft space
Hi Praxidicae, I don't think the move of this article to draftspace was appropriate. This article certainly had room for improvement, but it was not at a state where it should be deleted in six months if not improved (what a move to draftspace means). Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- I did this after conferring with a native arabic speaker who confirmed to me that this wasn't properly sourced (and likely not notable but that's another matter)...Praxidicae (talk) 11:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Pressure CookerYou keep reverting my corrections. The information to which you keep reverting is incorrect. Please stop. Thank you.Clepsydrae (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Mahabalipuram vs Mamallapuram
Hi, Just to let you know that I intend to restore the article title as Mahabalipuram. It was moved to Mamallapuram in 2017 by an editor without seeking consensus. The situation is similar to what we are facing at Talk:Allahabad (government deciding to rename a city), however we are having a clear consensus that we do not rename until WP:COMMONNAME is satisfied. Mahabalipuram has four times more Google results than Mamallapuram and is infinitely more common across the world than the new name. — kashmīrī TALK 16:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- No, you need to get consensus. Praxidicae (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Why so? Reverting a change doesn't need a consensus. WP:BRD. — kashmīrī TALK 16:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- For page moves it absolutely does. Praxidicae (talk) 16:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, no probs. — kashmīrī TALK 16:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- For page moves it absolutely does. Praxidicae (talk) 16:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Why so? Reverting a change doesn't need a consensus. WP:BRD. — kashmīrī TALK 16:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Make Wiki Safer
Hi there,
I want to disclose an under cover page without any notability and just created for google panel. have a look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romy_Johnson --Bingo2020 (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Bingo2020, Did you say an “under cover” page? How did you know it was “created for google panel” ? I’m guessing you mean it was created just for show(someone who justs wants a Wikipedia presence) by a paid editor, but again how did you get to know this? Celestina007 (talk) 23:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae Just check list of paid references! little dig in will lead you to cause of this page creation! Bingo2020 (talk) 23:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Bingo2020, I’m not Praxidicae. Anyway, you joining this collaborative project 13 hours ago & your first edit being an unsuccessful attempt to send the article to an AFD shows there is a lot of off-wiki backstory we obviously aren’t seeing/getting, either you have a COI with the article creator or its subject, or you are reporting competition. Having said that, If you think the article doesn’t satisfy WP:GNG, see WP:AFDHOWTO & follow the steps to correctly nominate the article(or any article) for deletion. Celestina007 (talk) 00:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Celestina007 @Praxidicae you are free to express your opinion but the page I mentioned is now nominated to deletion! --Bingo2020 (talk) 20:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Bingo2020, I did not say it was notable & no! it has not been nominated for deletion, all of which is asides the point. Celestina007 (talk) 20:25, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Celestina007 @Praxidicae you are free to express your opinion but the page I mentioned is now nominated to deletion! --Bingo2020 (talk) 20:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Bingo2020, I’m not Praxidicae. Anyway, you joining this collaborative project 13 hours ago & your first edit being an unsuccessful attempt to send the article to an AFD shows there is a lot of off-wiki backstory we obviously aren’t seeing/getting, either you have a COI with the article creator or its subject, or you are reporting competition. Having said that, If you think the article doesn’t satisfy WP:GNG, see WP:AFDHOWTO & follow the steps to correctly nominate the article(or any article) for deletion. Celestina007 (talk) 00:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae Just check list of paid references! little dig in will lead you to cause of this page creation! Bingo2020 (talk) 23:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Request Recreation Zanda Zakuza
Hi I'm@F5pillar: you move this Zanda Zakuza into draft and still in red tag. I just want to recreate the page, didn't really know what make the page be deleted and can't even find who create the article, maybe if you can allow me to recreate the page because it's already in my list of article to be created, never realise it was even in WP before, it was when I search for it before noticing it was in red tag and already deleted. Much regards (F5pillar---/ Let's talk🖋📩) 08:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
There is no consensus on Swarajya Magazine webpage
Sorry, there is no consensus on talk page. There is just an unfinished agenda. Possibly one side was tired out. I am working to put a banner on the page citing that this topic is under discussion with no consensus. Baransam (talk) 11:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- There is consensus. Read it. Revert it again and you'll be blocked. And read this Praxidicae (talk) 11:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Please look up dictionary entry of consensus. If I am disagreeing, how can you claim consensus? I am curious to see how does blocking feel like? And how can one user (you) block another one (me) because you disagree with me? Baransam (talk) 12:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- I won't block you but if you continue edit warring and making contentious edit summaries such as your last one, an administrator will. Perhaps you should read WP:CONSENSUS . Praxidicae (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing the WP:CONSENSUS link. I disagree with the statement that there was any consensus reached. I will seek compromise as per the flow chart. I will also attempt to put the page under suitable disclaimer till then. Baransam (talk) 12:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- I won't block you but if you continue edit warring and making contentious edit summaries such as your last one, an administrator will. Perhaps you should read WP:CONSENSUS . Praxidicae (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Please look up dictionary entry of consensus. If I am disagreeing, how can you claim consensus? I am curious to see how does blocking feel like? And how can one user (you) block another one (me) because you disagree with me? Baransam (talk) 12:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Question about an account doing cross-wiki spams
Hi! Sorry to bother you, but I was wondering if you could perhaps help with my enquiry about what's the best course of action about a user who's recently recreated a previously deleted article on Simple Wiki. The account is the sole creator for the article that was previously deleted (QD for failing GNG) and has created a series of articles across many many wiki projects and now claiming notability based on those. You may check the full details in my notes in this RfD thread. As I noticed you're pretty active in fighting such spams in the RfD threads here on EN, I was hoping you could point me towards the right direction? — Infogapp1 (talk) 14:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello
Hi there, As i see you are continually placing the speedy deletion tag on the page Vivek Verma, i am writing here to inform you that i oppose that deletion, and i am going to remove the tag from the page as per wp policies any one can contest the deletion if they feel like, moreover it seems like you are in a edit war!! Stonertone (talk) 14:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- No, you may not remove G4 without adequate reason (ie. can definitively say it is different). Remove it again and you will be in violation of WP:3RR among other things. Praxidicae (talk) 14:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Need Help Making Article Better
Hello Praxidicae, you recently nominated my article on Marko Danial for deletion, and I was curious as to why? I have worked on this page for a while, and I believe everything is done correctly this time. Although it may be a bit similar to a previous article written on him, it is still limited in the new information that is used as well as many more different sources. Since he is a public figure, it is a bit harder to write new information without making it too promotional. Any advice on how we can save it so it does not get deleted? :)
- Johnson28.7 It was explained thoroughly to you at the previous AFD which you even participated in. I also explained issues in my warnings which you've yet to address. Praxidicae (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Praxidicae (talk) would you mind taking a look at it now. I have edited the article and removed any similar information from the last article. Johnson28.7 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Johnson28.7 No. You've only succeeded in making it much worse by adding garbage sources that were paid for by the subject/their PR team. Also stop obfuscating; if you keep ignoring my question about your affiliation to the artist and your status as a paid editor, I will not respond nor will I help. Praxidicae (talk) 18:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Praxidicae I apologize for wasting your time, I'm still a newbie to Wikipedia trying to get the hang of things lol. But no I am not affiliated with the subject. Johnson28.7 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:51, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Well if you don't want to waste my time, try not wasting it with blatant and provable untruths. Praxidicae (talk) 18:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm sorry once again Praxidicae , I will try to do better next time, and more importantly, I will not publish another article without making sure it follows all Wikipedia's guidelines. :) Johnson28.7 (talk)
We are a conversation (film)
Sir, what do u mean no coverage? and in terms of notability i have included enough evidence supporting my insertions , i would appreciate it if u could help evolve and advance this page . thanks in advance .
- None of your references confer notability. Also please don't assume everyone on Wikipedia is a "sir." Refer to people by their usesrnames. You can read a detailed explanation in the deletion nomination. Praxidicae (talk) 12:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Also, please don't create articles by copypasting from IMDB. You must use your own words. I have deleted to article as a copyright violation. Bishonen | tålk 12:57, 4 July 2020 (UTC).
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Good job done. Thanks for the guidance. Vijay Kaushik (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC) |