Jump to content

Little Sisters of the Poor: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania: reword for clarity, improve citations formatting
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
On October 6, 2017, the [[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services]] issued a new rule with an updated religious exemption that protected religious [[nonprofit organization]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Trump Administration Issues Rules Protecting the Conscience Rights of All Americans|url=https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2017/10/06/trump-administration-issues-rules-protecting-the-conscience-rights-of-all-americans.html |date=October 6, 2017 |work= [[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services]] |language=en|access-date=May 13, 2020 }}</ref> [[United States federal judge|Federal Judge]] [[Wendy Beetlestone]] issued an injunction, temporarily preventing the enforcement of that exemption.<ref name="bbc.com">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41528526|title=Trump rolls back free birth control|date= October 6, 2017|work= BBC News }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-nws-pa-judge-birth-control-trump-20171215-story.html|title=Federal judge in Pennsylvania temporarily blocks new Trump rules on birth control|work=The Associated Press |publisher= The Morning Call }}</ref> The state of Pennsylvania also sued the federal government to take away the exemption.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Little Sisters of the Poor v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania|url=https://www.becketlaw.org/case/commonwealth-pennsylvania-v-trump/|website=Becket|language=en-US|access-date= May 13, 2020 }}</ref> Pennsylvania asked a judge to order that the Little Sisters of the Poor must comply with the federal mandate or pay a penalty of tens of millions of dollars.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Little Sisters of the Poor should finally get their win|url=https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/497416-the-little-sisters-of-the-poor-should-finally-get-their-win|last=Malhi|first=Sabrina|date=May 12, 2020 |website=TheHill|language=en|access-date=May 13, 2020 }}</ref> The state alleged that the religious organization violated the Constitution, federal anti-discrimination law, and the [[Administrative Procedure Act]] (APA).<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania|url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/19-431|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date= June 14, 2020 |website=Oyez|language=en}}</ref>
On October 6, 2017, the [[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services]] issued a new rule with an updated religious exemption that protected religious [[nonprofit organization]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Trump Administration Issues Rules Protecting the Conscience Rights of All Americans|url=https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2017/10/06/trump-administration-issues-rules-protecting-the-conscience-rights-of-all-americans.html |date=October 6, 2017 |work= [[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services]] |language=en|access-date=May 13, 2020 }}</ref> [[United States federal judge|Federal Judge]] [[Wendy Beetlestone]] issued an injunction, temporarily preventing the enforcement of that exemption.<ref name="bbc.com">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41528526|title=Trump rolls back free birth control|date= October 6, 2017|work= BBC News }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-nws-pa-judge-birth-control-trump-20171215-story.html|title=Federal judge in Pennsylvania temporarily blocks new Trump rules on birth control|work=The Associated Press |publisher= The Morning Call }}</ref> The state of Pennsylvania also sued the federal government to take away the exemption.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Little Sisters of the Poor v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania|url=https://www.becketlaw.org/case/commonwealth-pennsylvania-v-trump/|website=Becket|language=en-US|access-date= May 13, 2020 }}</ref> Pennsylvania asked a judge to order that the Little Sisters of the Poor must comply with the federal mandate or pay a penalty of tens of millions of dollars.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Little Sisters of the Poor should finally get their win|url=https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/497416-the-little-sisters-of-the-poor-should-finally-get-their-win|last=Malhi|first=Sabrina|date=May 12, 2020 |website=TheHill|language=en|access-date=May 13, 2020 }}</ref> The state alleged that the religious organization violated the Constitution, federal anti-discrimination law, and the [[Administrative Procedure Act]] (APA).<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania|url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/19-431|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date= June 14, 2020 |website=Oyez|language=en}}</ref>


On July 8, 2020, in [[Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania]], the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] decided that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services had the authority under the ACA to allow the religious and moral exemptions, and that the rules for the exemptions are free from procedural defects.<ref>"[https://spacecoastdaily.com/2020/07/breaking-supreme-court-rules-7-2-in-favor-of-little-sisters-of-the-poor-in-obamacare-contraception-case/ Supreme Court Rules 7-2 in Favor of Little Sisters of the Poor in ObamaCare Contraception Case]". ''Fox News''. Space Coast Daily. July 8, 2020.</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania|url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/19-431|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date= June 14, 2020 |website=Oyez|language=en}}</ref>
On July 8, 2020, in [[Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania]], the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] decided that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services had the authority under the ACA to allow the religious and moral exemptions, and that the rules for the exemptions are free from procedural defects,<ref>"[https://spacecoastdaily.com/2020/07/breaking-supreme-court-rules-7-2-in-favor-of-little-sisters-of-the-poor-in-obamacare-contraception-case/ Supreme Court Rules 7-2 in Favor of Little Sisters of the Poor in ObamaCare Contraception Case]". ''Fox News''. Space Coast Daily. July 8, 2020.</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania|url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/19-431|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date= June 14, 2020 |website=Oyez|language=en}}</ref> meaning that the Little Sisters of the Poor need not provide contraception nor abortion coverage in their employees' health plans.


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 05:03, 9 July 2020

This article is about the order founded in France. For the order founded in Spain, see Little Sisters of the Abandoned Elderly.
Saint Jeanne Jugan

The Little Sisters of the Poor (Template:Lang-fr) is a Catholic religious institute for women. It was founded by Jeanne Jugan. Having felt the need to care for the many impoverished elderly who lined the streets of French towns and cities, Jugan established the congregation to care for the elderly in 1839.[1]

History

Main article: Jeanne Jugan

The Congregation of the Little Sisters of the Poor was founded in Cancale in Brittany in 1839. In 1847, a house was established in Tours, and communities of sisters began to spread across France. In 1851, the work expanded to England.

In 1868, the Little Sisters came to the United States, where they operate twenty-nine homes to care for the elderly poor.[2]

Jugan was canonized a saint on October 11, 2009, by Pope Benedict XVI.[3]

Present day

The motherhouse is in Saint-Pern, France.[1] Internationally, the letters following their name are PSDP. In the United States, however, they are LSP. Today the Little Sisters of the Poor serve over 13,000 of the elderly poor in 31 countries around the world (including homes in the United States, Turkey, Hong Kong, Taiwan, India, Penang, New Zealand, and Philippines), continuing their original purpose of caring for the elderly. As of January 1, 2014, they were one of the larger religious institutes of women in the Catholic Church, with 234 houses and 2,372 members.[4]

Members, per the evangelical counsels, make vows of chastity, poverty, and obedience, but also a fourth, hospitality. They believe hospitality perfects the other three by bringing their religious consecration into the realities of everyday life and giving a spiritual dimension to the many humble tasks of hospitality performed throughout the day.[5] They wear traditional habits, either all-white or black with gray veils.[2]

The Sisters continue the tradition of begging, which was set forth by their founder, Jugan. To provide for the needs of the aged poor, she traveled the roads of France on foot seeking alms. She was recognized by the begging basket she carried. Knocking on doors, she asked for not only money but also for gifts that were needed, such as food, clothing, wood, and wool.[2]

Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) tried to require employers to offer health-insurance plans that paid for contraceptives. The law specifically exempted churches, but not faith-based ministries. Consequently, religious nonprofit organizations, such as Little Sisters of the Poor, were fined if they did not comply with the law.[6]

On October 6, 2017, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a new rule with an updated religious exemption that protected religious nonprofit organizations.[7] Federal Judge Wendy Beetlestone issued an injunction, temporarily preventing the enforcement of that exemption.[8][9] The state of Pennsylvania also sued the federal government to take away the exemption.[10] Pennsylvania asked a judge to order that the Little Sisters of the Poor must comply with the federal mandate or pay a penalty of tens of millions of dollars.[11] The state alleged that the religious organization violated the Constitution, federal anti-discrimination law, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).[12]

On July 8, 2020, in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services had the authority under the ACA to allow the religious and moral exemptions, and that the rules for the exemptions are free from procedural defects,[13][14] meaning that the Little Sisters of the Poor need not provide contraception nor abortion coverage in their employees' health plans.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Our Sunday Visitor's Catholic Almanac 2015. Our Sunday Visitor. 2015. pp. 482–483. ISBN 978-1-61278-830-2.
  2. ^ a b c Hamedy, Saba. "With health-care lawsuit, the Little Sisters of the Poor step into the spotlight", The Washington Post, January 20, 2014
  3. ^ "Saint Jeanne Jugan", Catholic News Agency
  4. ^ Our Sunday Visitor's Catholic Almanac 2015. Our Sunday Visitor. 2015. p. 486. ISBN 978-1-61278-830-2.
  5. ^ Little Sisters of the Poor Archived 2015-02-14 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Alvaré, Helen (May 5, 2020). "The Endless War on the Little Sisters of the Poor". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved May 13, 2020.
  7. ^ "Trump Administration Issues Rules Protecting the Conscience Rights of All Americans". U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. October 6, 2017. Retrieved May 13, 2020.
  8. ^ "Trump rolls back free birth control". BBC News. October 6, 2017.
  9. ^ "Federal judge in Pennsylvania temporarily blocks new Trump rules on birth control". The Associated Press. The Morning Call.
  10. ^ "Little Sisters of the Poor v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania". Becket. Retrieved May 13, 2020.
  11. ^ Malhi, Sabrina (May 12, 2020). "The Little Sisters of the Poor should finally get their win". TheHill. Retrieved May 13, 2020.
  12. ^ "Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania". Oyez. Retrieved June 14, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  13. ^ "Supreme Court Rules 7-2 in Favor of Little Sisters of the Poor in ObamaCare Contraception Case". Fox News. Space Coast Daily. July 8, 2020.
  14. ^ "Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania". Oyez. Retrieved June 14, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Little Sisters of the Poor.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Little_Sisters_of_the_Poor&oldid=966782056"