I consider this UI feature relevant enough for a mention, Viper considers it too trivial. I don't mind leaving it out, but I am asking here just to hear what other people think. --23:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
While I consider this UI feature relevant enough for a mention, because it is a change relative to the predecessors which makes it more relevant, Viper considers it too trivial for a mention. Although I don't mind leaving it out, I am asking here just to hear what other people think. --23:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
=== References ===
=== References ===
Revision as of 23:15, 9 July 2020
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Samsung Galaxy S5 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
I support the phrase "To be determined". ViperSnake151 supports "None, latest model". I don't like this description because it sounds like it's official that nothing will ever follow this in the sequence. Any thoughts?? Georgia guy (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Until the S6 is announced in 2015, it is possible the S5 will not have a successor (although this is very unlikely!). I prefer the "latest model" terminology. Also, this sort of info box shows up on many other articles, consistency is important. Frmorrison (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why is there no comparison like on the Galaxy S4 page?
You can create one if you would like to see the variant comparison. I originally created the S4 comparison and I don't see it as necessary anymore, the differences were minor. I would never delete it from the S4 article though.Frmorrison (talk) 02:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I added a comparison of the first generation S5 models. Will add the LTE+ and Neo devices later. I also need somebody with a more reliable source to verify the LTE bands of the Chinese models since my sources were in disagreement over which were actually supported. Dinjiin (talk) 04:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Consider Merging
I put a merger proposal between S5 Active since the S5 Active and S5 only have eight minor differences and only two are major - the MIL Spec and buttons. Also, the S5 article is is not that long. I created something about the differences. Note the S4 and S4 Active had more than two major differences, so those have two articles.Frmorrison (talk) 02:40, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Model SM-G900P
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
If someone with an account has the time, can you add SM-G900P to the list of S5 models? Noticed it when I was swapping the sd card over. This phone is sold in the US market for the Sprint network.
NFC in all versions? Between the plastic back cover and a L-shaped second plastic foil layer? (Seems to be Qi (standard) – hidden in table) According to Amazon NFC is built-in in the battery.
Hello,
This edit request is to remove or replace reference number 55, "Samsung SM-G900T Galaxy S5 LTE-A Specs". It redirects to random pages. Curious, I truncated the link to the main site to see if I could find a corrected url for you. This was,
samsunggalaxyspecs. com. Arriving there, I was audibly instructed to call a phone number and pay a fee to have a virus removed from my computer. That was a lie, by the way. I have no virus. And reference 56, for example, did not redirect. At any rate, I do not know how to edit Wikipedia pages, but have tried to raise an alarm here.
Thank you.
Kornshell (talk) 18:33, 26 August 2017 (UTC)kornshell[reply]
If I apply the same logic as C to C++ I wouldn't expect info on the S+ on the S page. If there isn't an S+ page consider making one. I'm new so maybe read the ToU carefully and/or wait for another editor to chime in. Somethingsomethingtypo (talk) 01:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The TouchWiz settings menu has been redesigned to flat design and has a new search feature.[1] There are three distinct viewing modes: Grid view, List view and Tab view.[2][3]
Reverted with comment "I still feel this is too trivial even in this form. No other phone goes into that much detail on its settings menu like that"
While I consider this UI feature relevant enough for a mention, because it is a change relative to the predecessors which makes it more relevant, Viper considers it too trivial for a mention. Although I don't mind leaving it out, I am asking here just to hear what other people think. --23:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=small}
.png){kind=link}